Vol. 78 No. 2 (2023)
Keynote Article

Valuing for sustainability: hidden costs and benefits in multidimensional agriculture

PDF
  • Francesco Marangon,
  • Alberto Bertossi,
  • Stefania Troiano
Francesco Marangon
Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Udine
Bio
Alberto Bertossi
Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Udine
Bio
Stefania Troiano
Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Udine
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14613

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • multifunctional agriculture,
  • true cost accounting,
  • true price,
  • payments for ecosystem services,
  • sustainable development

How to Cite

Marangon, F., Bertossi, A., & Troiano, S. (2023). Valuing for sustainability: hidden costs and benefits in multidimensional agriculture. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 78(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14613

Copyright (c) 2023 Francesco Marangon, Alberto Bertossi, Stefania Troiano

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The concept of agriculture has changed over the years. Whereas it was once considered simply a “means” for the production of goods (food and non-food), today, its multifunctionality, understood as the ability to also provide environmental and social services, takes on greater importance. The concept of multifunctionality is intended to change the conception of the agricultural sector and make it more suitable for the historical period of transition we are currently experiencing, for which it is essential to abandon old paradigms in order to create new ones. An unresolved challenge is providing value for each of the multifunctional services. This article provides a brief review of studies dedicated to identifying the main market and extra-market effects of multidimensional agriculture and describes some approaches used to adopt (monetary) quantification of related and secondary activities to facilitate the adoption of more sustainable practices. Special attention is given to payments for ecosystem services, true cost accounting, and true price tools to analyse the positive and negative externalities of multifunctional agricultural systems.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Aguglia L., Henke R., Salvioni C. (2008). Multifunctional Agriculture. Entrepreneurial Behaviours and Strategies in the Search for Diversification. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: Naples, Italy.
  2. Aspenson A. (2020). “True” costs for food system reform: An overview of true cost accounting literature and initiatives. Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, Baltimore, US.
  3. Baker L., Castilleja G., De Groot Ruiz A., Jones A. (2020). Prospects for the true cost accounting of food systems. Nature Foods, 1: 765-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00193-6
  4. Bernués A., Alfnes F., Clemetsen M., Eik L.O., Faccioni G., Ramanzin M., Ripoll-Bosch R., Rodríguez-Ortega T., Sturaro E. (2019). Exploring social preferences for ecosystem services of multifunctional agriculture across policy scenarios. Ecosystem Services, 39, 101002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101002
  5. Bertossi A., Troiano S., Marangon F. (2023). Financing for sustainable food systems: The role of the vending sector. Economia agro-alimentare/Food Economy, 25(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/ecag2023oa14828
  6. Boix-Fayos C., de Vente J. (2023). Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture within the European Green Deal. Agricultural Systems, 207, 103634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103634
  7. Bonfiglio A., Abitabile C., Henke R. (2022). A choice model-based analysis of diversification in organic and conventional farms. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 11(2): 131-146. DOI: https://doi:10.36253/bae-12206
  8. Bretagnolle V., Berthet E., Gross N., Gauffre B., Plumejeaud C., Houte S., Badenhausser I., Monceau K., Allier F., Monestiez P., Gaba S. (2018). Towards sustainable and multifunctional agriculture in farmland landscapes: lessons from the integrative approach of a French LTSER platform. Science of the Total Environment, 627: 822-834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.142
  9. Brunori G. (2022). Agriculture and rural areas facing the “twin transition”: principles for a sustainable rural digitalisation. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 77(3): 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13983.
  10. Clark M., Springmann M., Rayner M., Scarborough P., Hill J., Tilman D., Macdiarmid J.I., Fanzo J., Bandy L., Harrington R.A. (2022). Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(33), e2120584119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120584119
  11. Corsi S., Dell’Ovo M., Dezio C., Longo A., Oppio A. (2023). Beyond food: Framing ecosystem services value in peri-urban farming in the post-Covid era with a multidimensional perspective. The case of Cascina Biblioteca in Milan. Cities, 137: 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104332
  12. Eigenraam M., Jekums A., Mcleod R., Obst C., Sharma K. (2020). Applying the TEEBAgriFood Evaluation Framework: Overarching Implementation Guidance. Global Alliance for the Future of Food.
  13. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65: 663-674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011
  14. European Commission (2021). Ensuring that Polluters Pay. Payments for Ecosystem Services, European Union. Volume 01, Luxemburg.
  15. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2022). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022. Repurposing food and agricultural policies to make healthy diets more affordable. Rome, FAO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0639en
  16. Food and Land Use Coalition (2019). Growing Better: Ten Critical Transitions to Transform Food and Land Use. The Global Consultation Report of the Food and Land Use Coalition.
  17. Farley J., Costanza R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological economics, 69(11): 2060-2068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010
  18. Gaglio M., Lanzoni M., Goggi F., Fano E.A., Castaldelli G. (2023). Integrating payment for ecosystem services in protected areas governance: The case of the Po Delta Park. Ecosystem Services, 60, 101516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101516
  19. Galgani P., van Veen B., Kanidou D., de Adelhart Toorop R., Woltjer G. (2023). True price assessment method for agri-food products. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen.
  20. Galgani P., Woltjer G., de Adelhart Toorop R., de Groot Ruiz A., Varoucha E. (2021). Land use, land use change, biodiversity and ecosystem services: true pricing method for agri-food products. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen.
  21. Galler C., Alber C., von Haaren C. (2016). From regional environmental planning to implementation: Paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 18: 118-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.031
  22. Gargano G., Licciardo F., Verrascina M., Zanetti B. (2021). The Agroecological Approach as a Model for Multifunctional Agriculture and Farming towards the European Green Deal 2030 - Some Evidence from the Italian Experience. Sustainability, 13, 2215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042215
  23. Gliessman S.R. (2021). Package price agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food systems. CRC press.
  24. Haile K.K., Tirivayi N., Tesfaye W. (2019). Farmers’ willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services on agricultural land: The case of climate-smart agroforestry in Ethiopia. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100964
  25. Havinga I., Hein L., Vega-Araya M., Languillaume A. (2020). Spatial quantification to examine the effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services: a case study of Costa Rica’s Pago de Servicios Ambientales. Ecological Indicators. 108, 105766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105766
  26. Hayes T., Murtinho F., Wolff H., López-Sandoval M.F., Salazar J. (2022). Effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services after loss and uncertainty of compensation. Nature Sustainability, 5(1): 81-88.
  27. Hendriks S., Soussana J.F., Cole M., Kambug A., Zilberman D. (2023a). Ensuring Access to Safe and Nutritious Food for All Through the Transformation of Food Systems. Science and Innovations for Food Systems Transformation, 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_4
  28. Hendriks S., de Groot Ruiz A., Herrero Acosta M., Baumers H., Galgani P., Mason-D’Croz D., Waha K., Kanidou D., von Braun J., Benitez M., Blanke J., Caron P., Fanzo J., Greb F., Haddad L., Herforth A., Jordaan D., Masters W., Sadoff C., Soussana JF, Tirado MC, Torero M., Watkins, M. (2023b). The true cost of food: A preliminary assessment. In: von Braun J., Afsana K., Fresco L.O., Hassan M.H.A. (eds), Science and innovations for food systems transformation, 581-601, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15703-5_32
  29. Henke R., Vanni F. (2017). Drivers of on-farm diversification in the Italian peri-urban agriculture. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 72(1): 79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-21965.
  30. Huang J., Tichit M., Poulot M., Darly S., Li S., Petit C., Aubry C. (2015). Comparative review of multifunctionality and ecosystem services in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management, 149: 138-147. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.020
  31. Jac B.K., Kousky C., Sims K.R. (2008). Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences, 105(28): 9465-9470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705503104
  32. Kam H., Smith H., Potter C. (2023). Public money for public goods: The role of ideas in driving agriculture policy in the EU and post-Brexit UK. Land Use Policy, 129, 106618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106618
  33. Malorgio G., Marangon F. (2021). Agricultural business economics: the challenge of sustainability. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9: 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00179-3.
  34. Marangon F. (2008). Imprese agroalimentari e produzione di beni pubblici. In: Boggia A., Martino G. (a cura di), Agricolture e mercati in transizione, Atti del XLIII Convegno di Studi SIDEA, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 2008, pp. 197-219.
  35. Marangon F., Troiano S. (2013). New tools for EU agricultural sector and rural areas. What role for public policy in promoting Payments for Ecosystem Services?. In: “Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy”, 2: 7-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.169770
  36. Marangon F., Troiano S. (2017). Policy and governance of payments for ecosystem services in agri-food value chains. In: Martino G., Karantininis K., Pascucci S., Dries L., Codron J.M. (eds), It’s a jungle out there – the strange animals of economic organization in agri-food value chains. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp. 357-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-844-5
  37. Michalke A., Stein L., Fichtner R., Gaugler T.C., Stoll‑Kleemann S. (2022). True cost accounting in agri‑food networks: a German case study on informational campaigning and responsible implementation. Sustainability Science, 17: 2269-2285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01105-2
  38. Michalke A., Köhler S., Messmann L., Thorenz A., Tuma A., Gaugler T.C. (2023). True cost accounting of organic and conventional food production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 137134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137134
  39. Minotti B., Antonelli M., Dembska K., Marino D., Riccardi G., Vitale M., Calabrese I., Recanati F., Giosuè A. (2022). True Cost Accounting of a healthy and sustainable diet in Italy. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9, 974768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.974768.
  40. Nowack J.C., Schmid J.C., Harald G. (2022). Social dimensions of multifunctional agriculture in Europe - towards an interdisciplinary framework. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(5): 758-773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1977520.
  41. OECD (2001). Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. OECD: Paris, France.
  42. OECD (2003). Multifunctionality: The Policy Implications. OECD: Paris, France.
  43. OECD (2005). Multifunctionality in Agriculture. What Role for Private Initiatives? OECD: Paris, France.
  44. OECD (2008). Multifunctionality in Agriculture: Evaluating the Degree of Jointness, Policy Implications. OECD: Paris, France.
  45. Pascual U., Muradian R., Rodríguez L.C., Duraiappah A. (2010). Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecological Economics 69: 1237-1244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.004
  46. Patel R. (2021). A democratic alternative to true cost pricing. Nature Food, September, 632-634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00347-0
  47. Perrot-Maitre D. (2006). The Vittel payment for ecosystem services: a “perfect” PES case? International Institute for Environment and Development. London, UK.
  48. Piñeiro V., Arias J., Dürr J., Elverdin P., Ibáñez A. M., Kinengyere A., Opazo C.M., Owoo N., Page J.R., Prager S.D., Torero M. (2020). A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nature Sustainability, 3(10): 809-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y
  49. Potter C. (2004). Multifunctionality as an agricultural and rural policy concept. In: Brouwer F. (eds.), Sustaining agriculture and the rural environment: governance, policy and multifunctionality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 15-35.
  50. Roep D., Van Der Ploeg J.D. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. In: van Huylenbroeck G., Durand G. (eds.), Multifunctional Agriculture. A new paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. Ashgate, Aldershot (UK) and Burlington (Vt, Usa).
  51. Rovai M., Andreoli M. (2016). Combining Multifunctionality and Ecosystem Services into a Win-Win Solution. The Case Study of the Serchio River Basin (Tuscany-Italy). Agriculture, 6(4): 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6040049
  52. Salzman J., Bennett G., Carroll N., Goldstein A., Jenkins M. (2018). The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services. Nature Sustainability, 1: 136-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0033-0
  53. Schirpke U., Marino D., Marucci A., Palmieri M. (2018). Positive effects of payments for ecosystem services on biodiversity and socio-economic development: Examples from Natura 2000 sites in Italy. Ecosystem Services, 34: 96-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.006
  54. Schomers S., Matzdorf B. (2013). Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries. Ecosystem services, 6: 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.01.002
  55. Schomers S., Meyer C., Matzdorf B., Sattler C. (2021). Facilitation of public Payments for Ecosystem Services through local intermediaries: An institutional analysis of agri‐environmental measure implementation in Germany. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(5): 520-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1950
  56. Sivini S., Vitale A. (2023). Multifunctional and Agroecological Agriculture as Pathways of Generational Renewal in Italian Rural Areas. Sustainability, 15, 5990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075990
  57. Smith H.F., Sullivan C. (2014). Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes-farmers’ perceptions. Ecological Economics, 98: 72-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.008
  58. Song B., Robinson G.M. (2020). Multifunctional agriculture: Policies and implementation in China. Geography Compass, 14(11), e12538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12538
  59. Steiner A., Aguilar G., Bomba K., Bonilla J.P., Campbell A., Echeverria R., Gandhi R., Hedegaard C., Holdorf D., Ishii N., Quinn K., Ruter B., Sunga I., Sukhdev P., Verghese S., Voegele J., Winters P., Campbell B., Dinesh D., Huyer S., Jarvis A., Loboguerrero Rodriguez A.M., Millan A., Thornton P., Wollenberg L., Zebiak S. (2020). Actions to transform food systems under climate change. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS).
  60. Tanak, K., Hanley N., Kuhfuss L. (2022). Farmers’ preferences toward an outcome‐based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3): 720-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12478
  61. Taufik D., van Haaster-de Winter M.A., Machiel J., Reinders M.J. (2023). Creating trust and consumer value for true price food products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390: 136-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136145
  62. TEEB (2018). TEEB for Agriculture & Food: Scientific and Economic Foundations. Geneva: UN Environment.
  63. Tempesta T., Vecchiato D. (2022). An Explorative Analysis of the Influence of Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality on Food Preferences in Italy: A Pilot Study. Foods, 11(12), 1779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11121779.
  64. Thornton P., Chang Y., Loboguerrero A.M., Campbell B. (2023). Perspective: What might it cost to reconfigure food systems?. Global Food Security, 36, 100669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022 100669
  65. Tran D.X., Pearson D., Palmer A., Dominati E.J., Gray D., Lowry J. (2023). Integrating ecosystem services with geodesign to create multifunctional agricultural landscapes: A case study of a New Zealand hill country farm. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109762
  66. Troiano S., Marangon F. (2011). Payments for ecosystem services: development opportunities from landscape and environmental resources management. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, LIII(3): 87-113. (in Italian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/EFE2010-003006
  67. van der Ploeg JD., Laurent C., Blondeau F., Bonnafous P. (2009). Farm diversity, classification schemes and multifunctionality. Journal of Environmental Management, 90: 124-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.022
  68. van der Ploeg J.D., Roep D. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: The actual situation in Europe. In: van Huylenbroeck G., Durand G. (eds), Multifunctional Agriculture. A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK, 37-54.
  69. Van Huylenbroeck G., Vandermeulen V., Mettepenningen E., Verspecht A. (2007). Multifunctionality of Agriculture: A Review of Definitions, Evidence and Instruments. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 1: 1-43. DOI: http://doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2007-3
  70. von Braun J., Sheryl L.H. (2023). Full-cost accounting and redefining the cost of food: Implications for agricultural economics research, Agricultural Economics, 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12774
  71. Wezel A., Bellon S., Doré T., Francis C., Vallod D., David C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Agronomy for sustainable development, 29: 503-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004
  72. White A.C., Faulkner J.W., Conner D.S., Méndez V.E., Niles M.T. (2022). “How can you put a price on the environment?” Farmer perspectives on stewardship and payment for ecosystem services. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 77(3): 270-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00041
  73. Wilson G.A. (2007). Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective. CAB International: Wallingford, UK.
  74. Wilson G.A. (2008). From “weak” to “strong” multifunctionality: Conceptualising farm-level multifunctional transitional pathways. Journal of Rural Studies, 24: 367-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.010
  75. World Health Organization (2019). Sustainable healthy diets: Guiding principles. Food & Agriculture Organization, Rome.
  76. Wunder S. (2015). Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 117: 234-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.08.016
  77. Wunder S., Engel S., Pagiola S. (2008). Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65: 834-852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010
  78. Wünscher T., Engel S. (2012). International payments for biodiversity services: review and evaluation of conservation targeting approaches. Biological Conservation, 152: 222-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.003
  79. Ya H., Yang H., Gu X., Zhao S., Jiang Q.O. (2022). Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review. Ecological Economics, 201, 107591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107591
  80. Zhang Y., Long H., Chen S., Gan M. (2023). The development of multifunctional agriculture in farming regions of China: Convergence or divergence?. Land Use Policy, 127, 106576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106576.

Most read articles by the same author(s)