Just Accepted Manuscripts
Short Communications

Policies for the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in southern Italian areas: the state of the art

Just Accepted
  • Francesca Giarè,
  • Anna Vagnozzi
Francesca Giarè
CREA - PB
Anna Vagnozzi
CREA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16865

Published 2025-12-22

Keywords

  • AKIS,
  • Agricultural policy,
  • Agricultural innovation,
  • Interactive approach

How to Cite

Giarè, F., & Vagnozzi, A. (2025). Policies for the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in southern Italian areas: the state of the art. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16865

Copyright (c) 2025 Francesca Giarè, Anna Vagnozzi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper analyses the state of innovation in Italian agriculture, with a particular focus on southern areas, and examines the evolution of European Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System (AKIS) policies over the last 15 years. Using data from the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) Agricultural Census and Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN)-derived indicators, this study highlights a markedly low propensity for innovation among farms in southern Italy, linked to structural weaknesses; limited digitalisation; and suboptimal performance across economic, environmental, and social dimensions. Despite these challenges, regional policy strategies appear largely uniform throughout Italy, showing little adaptation to the specific needs of lagging areas. The review of rural development interventions illustrates persistent difficulties in implementing advisory services, contrasted with stronger uptake and better financial performance of innovation-oriented measures, particularly Operational Groups under the European Innovation Partnership for Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability. The Italian Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plan for 2023-2027 introduces mechanisms to strengthen system coordination and enhance advisory and knowledge-exchange functions; however, budget allocations remain modest, especially in southern Italy. In conclusion, fragmentation within the Italian AKIS, coupled with cautious regional programming, risks perpetuating existing disparities and limiting the agricultural sector’s capacity to address structural, environmental, and competitiveness challenges.

Just Accepted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Arzeni A., Ascione E., Borsotto P., Carta V., Castellotti T., Vagnozzi A. (2021). Analysis of farms characteristics related to innovation needs: a proposal for supporting the public decision-making process. Land Use Policy, 100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104892.
  2. Birke F. M., Knierim A., Bae S., Gerster-Bentaya M. (2025). How to comparatively analyse the AKIS across European countries – conceptual foundations and application. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2025.2559583.
  3. Bonfiglio A. (2024). Unveiling innovation imperatives in agriculture: a data-driven framework for identifying latent needs and regional priorities, Sustainable Futures, 8, 100273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100273.
  4. Bruno E., Castellano R., Punzo G. (2025). A longitudinal analysis of local innovation in Italy: How do proximity measures matter? Spatial Economic Analysis, 20(1): 33-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2024.2378739.
  5. Capello R., Lenzi C. (2019). Regional innovation evolution and economic performance. Regional Studies, 53(9): 1240-1251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1502421.
  6. CREA (2017). La produzione e la diffusione di conoscenza nell’agroalimentare italiano. Soggetti, risorse finanziarie, interventi di promozione. Monografie dell’Annuario dell’agricoltura. Edizioni CREA, Roma.
  7. Del Puente F., Buonomo S., Sapio S. (2024). Promoting agricultural innovation through EIP-AGRI Operational Groups: insights from the Southern Italian projects. ECONOMIA MARCHE – Journal of Applied Economics, XLIII(2).
  8. Del Puente F., Sapio A., Yanhong J., Carl P. (2025). Assessing the impact of a European Union’s policy on agricultural innovation in Italy. Agriculture and Human Values, 42: 193-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10595-y.
  9. Di Santo N, Sisto R., Dragone V., Fucilli V. (2025). Balancing objectivity and subjectivity in agricultural funding: the case of AKIS measures. Sustainability, 17(10): 4730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104730.
  10. European Commission (2012). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the European Innovation Partnership “Agricultural Policy and Sustainability”, COM (2012)79 final, Brussels.
  11. European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, ADE s.a, CCRI and ÖIR GmbH, Evaluation support study on the impact of the CAP on territorial development of rural areas – Socioeconomic aspects, Publications Office, 2021. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/483196.
  12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION – Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development – Unit A.3 (2023): Guidelines. Evaluating the AKIS Strategic Approach in CAP Strategic Plans.
  13. European Commission (2024). Study on outcomes achieved by EIPAGRI Operational Group projects under the CAP, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels.
  14. EU SCAR (2012) Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems in Transition – A Reflection Paper, European Commission, Brussels.
  15. EU SCAR (2015). Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems Towards the Future – A Foresight Paper, European Commission, Brussels.
  16. EU SCAR AKIS (2019). Preparing for future AKIS in Europe, European Commission, Brussels.
  17. FAO (2024). World Food and Agriculture Statistical Yearbook 2024, FAO, Rome. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/cd2971en.
  18. Giarè F., Vagnozzi A. (2022). Governance’s effects on innovation processes: the experience of EIP AGRI’s Operational Groups (OGs) in Italy. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 76(3): 41-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13206.
  19. Ingram J., Dwyer J., Gaskell P., Mills J. (2018). Reconceptualising translation in agricultural innovation: a co-translation approach to bring research knowledge and practice closer together. Land Use Policy, 70: 38-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landuse-pol.2017.10.013.
  20. Knierim A., Boenning K., Caggiano M., Cristóvão A., Dirimanova V., Koehnen T., Labarthe P., Prager K. (2015). The AKIS concept and its relevance in selected EU member states. Outlook on Agriculture, 44(1): 29-36.
  21. Kok K.P.W., Klerkx L. (2023). Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 211, 103747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103747.
  22. Kountios G., Kanakaris S., Moulogianni C., Bournaris T. (2024). Strengthening AKIS for sustainable agricultural features: insights and innovations from the European Union: a literature review. Sustainability, 16, 7068. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su16167068.
  23. Labarthe P., Beck M. (2022). CAP e servizi di consulenza: dai sistemi di consulenza agricola al supporto all'innovazione. EuroChoices, 21: 5-14.
  24. Masi M., De Rosa M., Vecchio Y., Bartoli L., Adinolfi F. (2022). The long way to innovation adoption: insights from precision agriculture. Agricultural and Food Economics, 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-022-00236-5.
  25. Mikolič S., Slavič I.P. (2025). Exploring regional disparities and stakeholder engagement in Slovenian EIP-AGRI projects. Revija za Geografijo – Journal for Geography, 20(1): 89-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/rg.20.1.5041.
  26. OECD/Eurostat (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en.
  27. OECD (2019), Innovation, Productivity and Sustainability in Food and Agriculture: Main Findings from Country Reviews and Policy Lessons, OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/c9c4ec1d-en.
  28. Oliveira M.d.F., Gomes da Silva F., Ferreira S., Teixeira M., Damásio H., Dinis Ferreira A., Gonçalves J.M. (2019). Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture: Case Study of Lis Valley Irrigation District, Portugal. Sustainability, 11(2), 331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020331.
  29. Proietti P., Cristiano S. (2023). Innovation support services: an evidence-based exploration of their strategic roles in the Italian AKIS. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 29(3): 351-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2022.2069828.
  30. Rete Rurale Nazionale (2020). L’Italia e la Pac post 2020 - Policy Brief, OS: Promuovere e condividere conoscenze, innovazione e processi di digitalizzazione nell’agricoltura e nelle aree rurali incoraggiandone l’utilizzo, Rete Rurale Nazionale, Rome.
  31. Rete Rurale Nazionale (2023a). Interventi AKIS nel Piano Strategico della PAC 2023-2027, PSRhub, Rome.
  32. Rete Rurale Nazionale (2023b). Le azioni per il trasferimento della conoscenza e dell’innovazione Lo stato di avanzamento delle Misure 1, 2, 16.1 e 16.2 a dicembre 2022, Rete Rurale Nazionale, Rome.
  33. Sutherland L.-A., Prager K. (2025). Including AKIS in the 2023 CAP Strategic Plans: what difference has it made? EuroChoices. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.70011.
  34. Zahran Y., Kassem H.S., Naba S.M., Alotaibi B.A. (2020). Shifting from Fragmentation to Integration: A Proposed Framework for Strengthening Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation System in Egypt. Sustainability, 12(12), 5131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125131.

Most read articles by the same author(s)