Vol. 65 No. 1 (2026)
Articles

Detection and persistence of Bacillus- and Trichoderma-based biocontrol products on lemon plants

Giuseppa Rosaria LEONARDI
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Amanda VACCALLUZZO
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Giorgio GUSELLA
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Greta LA QUATRA
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Alessandra PINO
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Dalia AIELLO
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Cinzia CAGGIA
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Cinzia L. RANDAZZO
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
Giancarlo POLIZZI
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy

Published 2026-05-14

Keywords

  • BCA,
  • citrus,
  • endophytic colonization,
  • monitoring,
  • qPCR

How to Cite

[1]
G. R. LEONARDI, “Detection and persistence of Bacillus- and Trichoderma-based biocontrol products on lemon plants”, Phytopathol. Mediterr., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 133–152, May 2026.

Abstract

Knowledge of the ecology of biological control agents (BCAs), previously reported to be effective against the citrus vascular pathogen Plenodomus tracheiphilus, is required to improve scheduling of BCA field applications. Culture-dependent methods (dilution plate and direct plating) and culture-independent qPCR assays were used to determine survival of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST 713 and Trichoderma asperellum ICC 012 + T. gamsii ICC 080 on citrus stem and leaf tissues following foliar applications, and root endospheres and rhizospheres following root drenches with these Trichoderma BCAs. Viable population levels of B. amyloliquefaciens did not change over time on treated stems, whereas these decreased in leaf samples after 14 d. The qPCR assay detected B. amyloliquefaciens in all collected samples, with no temporal changes in population levels. Although the qPCR assay detected T. asperellum and T. gamsii in leaf and stem tissues, these fungi were isolated only from stem tissues, with increased isolations at 21 d post treatment compared with 7 d. Neither qPCR nor culturing detected Trichoderma species in citrus vascular root tissues. However, qPCR and culturing detected these fungi in host rhizospheres at 7, 14 and 21 d post inoculation, confirming their rhizosphere competence. This study has provided insights into colonization and survival within citrus plants of B. amyloliquefaciens and T. asperellum + T. gamsii contained in commercial biocontrol products. These indicate that integrating qPCR and culture-dependent approaches is important for detecting and quantifying these BCAs. The endophytic lifestyle of B. amyloliquefaciens and T. asperellum + T. gamsii makes them likely to provide long-term biological control. These results also indicate that the selected Bacillus and Trichoderma agents could spread and colonize citrus tissues over extended periods, and especially after host pruning or damage, which could promote plant colonization and protection from pathogens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Agostini J.P., Bushong P.M., Timmer L.W., 2003. Greenhouse evaluation of products that induce host resistance for control of scab, melanose, and Alternaria brown spot of citrus. Plant Disease 87(1): 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.69
  2. Aiello D., Leonardi G.R., Di Pietro C., Vitale A., Polizzi G., 2022. A new strategy to improve management of citrus Mal secco disease using bioformulates based on Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains. Plants 11(3): 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11030446
  3. Aiello D., Bregant C., Carlucci A., Guarnaccia V., Gusella G., … Polizzi G., 2023. Current status of Botryosphaeriaceae species in Italy: impacts on agricultural crops and forest ecosystems. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 62(3): 381–412. https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-14711
  4. Araújo W.L., Marcon J., Maccheroni W. Jr, van Elsas J.D., van Vuurde J.W., Azevedo J.L., 2002. Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with Xylella fastidiosa in citrus plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68(10): 4906–4914. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.10.4906-4914.2002
  5. Bae H., Sicher R.C., Kim M.S., Kim S.H., Strem M.D., … Bailey, B.A., 2009. The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 3279–3295. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp165
  6. Bowman K. D., and Joubert J., 2020. Citrus rootstocks, In: The genus citrus (M. Talon, M. Caruso, F. Gmitter jr, ed.), Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, Cambridge CB22 3HJ, United Kingdom.105-127.
  7. Bretträger M., Becker T., Gastl M., 2022. Screening of mycotoxigenic fungi in barley and barley malt (Hordeum vulgare L.) using real-time PCR—a comparison between molecular diagnostic and culture technique. Foods 11(8): 1149. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11081149
  8. Burandt Q.C., Deising H.B., von Tiedemann A., 2024. Further limitations of synthetic fungicide use and expansion of organic agriculture in Europe will increase the environmental and health risks of chemical crop protection caused by copper-containing fungicides. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 43(1): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5766
  9. Calcagnile M., Tredici M.S., Pennetta A., Resta S.C., Talà A., … Alifano P., 2022. Bacillus velezensis MT9 and Pseudomonas chlororaphis MT5 as biocontrol agents against citrus sooty mold and associated insect pests. Biological Control 176: 105091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105091
  10. Camprubí A., Calvet C., Estaún V., 1995. Growth enhancement of Citrus reshni after inoculation with Glomus intraradices and Trichoderma aureoviride and associated effects on microbial populations and enzyme activity in potting mixes. Plant and Soil 173: 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011460
  11. Card S., Johnson L., Teasdale S., Caradus J., 2016. Deciphering endophyte behaviour: the link between endophyte biology and efficacious biological control agents. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 92(8): 114. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw114
  12. Carro-Huerga G., Compant S., Gorfer M., Cardoza R.E., Schmoll M., … Casquero, P.A., 2022. Colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by the endophyte Trichoderma sp. strain T154: biocontrol activity against Phaeoacremonium minimum. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 1170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01170
  13. Catara A., Cutuli G., 1972. Osservazioni sulla suscettibilità di alcune Rutacee alle infezioni epigee di Phoma tracheiphila. Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per l’Agrumicoltura di Acireale 5: 29–43.
  14. Chen K., Tian Z., He H., Long C., Jiang F., 2020. Bacillus species as potential biocontrol agents against citrus diseases. Biological Control 151: 104419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104419
  15. Choudhary A.K., Singh N., Singh D., 2021. Evaluation of the bioformulation of potent native strains of Trichoderma spp. against the foot rot/gummosis of Kinnow mandarin. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control 31(1): 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00437-y
  16. Chun J., Bae K.S., 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus subtilis and related taxa based on partial gyrA gene sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 78: 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026555830014
  17. Clark T., Harris C.A., Tomerlin J.R., 2002. The regulation of pesticides in Europe—Directive 91/414. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 4(2): 28N–31N.
  18. Compant S., Clément C., Sessitsch A., 2010. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42(5): 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.024
  19. Dao T.T., Tran T.T., Nguyen A.M., Nguyen L.N., Pham P.T., … Nguyen M.N., 2021. Fungicide application can intensify clay aggregation and exacerbate copper accumulation in citrus soils. Environmental Pollution 288: 117703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117703
  20. de Lima F.B., Felix C., Osorio N., Alves A., Vitorino R., … Esteves A.C., 2017. Trichoderma harzianum T1A constitutively secretes proteins involved in the biological control of Guignardia citricarpa. Biological Control 106: 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.01.003
  21. Dimaria G., Mosca A., Anzalone A., Paradiso G., Nicotra D., … Catara V., 2023. Sour orange microbiome is affected by infections of Plenodomus tracheiphilus causal agent of citrus Mal secco disease. Agronomy 13(3): 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030654
  22. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) PLH Panel, 2014. Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Plenodomus tracheiphilus (Petri) Gruyter, Aveskamp & Verkley (syn. Phoma tracheiphila (Petri) L.A. Kantschaveli & Gikashvili). EFSA Journal 12(7): 3775. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3775
  23. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) PLH Panel, Bragard C., Baptista P., Chatzivassiliou E., Di Serio F., Gonthier P., … Reignault P.L., 2023. Scientific opinion on the pest categorisation of Neoscytalidium dimidiatum. EFSA Journal 21(5): e08001. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8001
  24. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Abdourahime H., Anastassiadou M., Arena M., Auteri D., Barmaz S., … Villamar‐Bouza, L., 2020. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mancozeb. EFSA Journal 18(12): e05755. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5755
  25. Espargham N., Mohammadi H., Gramaje D.A., 2020. Survey of trunk disease pathogens within citrus trees in Iran. Plants 9: 754. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060754
  26. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority, Arena M., Auteri D., Barmaz S., Bellisai G., Brancato A., … Villamar-Bouza L., 2018. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the activesubsttribasic copperance copper compounds copper(I), copper(II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper(I) oxide, Bordeaux mixture. EFSA Journal 16(1): 5152. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5152
  27. European Commission, 2018. Regulation (EU) 2018/1981 of 13 December 2018 renewing the approval of copper compounds. Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R1981&from=EN (accessed August 2025).
  28. European Commission, 2020. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 of 14 December 2020 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance mancozeb. Available online at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R2087&from=EN (accessed August 2025).
  29. Ezrari S., Mhidra O., Radouane N., Tahiri A., Polizzi G., Lazraq A., Lahlali R., 2021. Potential role of rhizobacteria isolated from citrus rhizosphere for biological control of citrus dry root rot. Plants 10(5): 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10050872
  30. FAOSTAT, 2024. Available online at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed June 26, 2025).
  31. Fawcett, H.S., 1936. Citrus Diseases and Their Control (2nd edition). McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York and London: xv + 656 pp.
  32. Ferreira F.V., Herrmann-Andrade A.M., Calabrese C.D., Bello F., Vázquez D., Musumeci M.A., 2020. Effectiveness of Trichoderma strains isolated from the rhizosphere of citrus tree to control Alternaria alternata, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Penicillium digitatum A21 resistant to pyrimethanil in post-harvest oranges (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). Journal of Applied Microbiology 129(3): 712–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14657
  33. Fontana D.C., de Paula S., Torres A.G., de Souza V.H.M., Pascholati S.F., … Dourado Neto, D., 2021. Endophytic fungi: biological control and induced resistance to phytopathogens and abiotic stresses. Pathogens 10: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10050570
  34. Foster J.W., 1999. When protons attack: microbial strategies of acid adaptation. Current Opinion in Microbiology 2: 170–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80030-7
  35. Garzón M.A., Mártiz J., Valdés-Gómez H.A., 2022. Characterization of Fusarium species that affect orange trees (Citrus × sinensis L.) and in vitro biocontrol essays with Trichoderma spp. In: XIV International Citrus Congress. Acta Horticulturae 1399: 417–422. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2024.1399.52
  36. Gazis R., Rehner S., Chaverri P., 2011. Species delimitation in fungal endophyte diversity studies and its implications in ecological and biogeographic inferences. Molecular Ecology 20(14): 3001–3013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05110.x
  37. Gerin D., Pollastro S., Raguseo C., De Miccolis Angelini R.M., Faretra F., 2018. A ready-to-use single- and duplex-TaqMan-qPCR assay to detect and quantify the biocontrol agents Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma gamsii. Frontiers in Microbiology 9: 2073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02073
  38. Giordano D.F., Pastor N.A., Rouws L.F.M., Moura de Freitas K., Erazo J.G., … Torres A.M., 2023. Trichoderma harzianum ITEM 3636 colonizes peanut roots as an endophyte and protects the plants against late leaf spot. Symbiosis 89: 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-023-00913-z
  39. Gorsuch J., LeSaint D., VanderKelen J., Buckman D., Kitts C.L., 2019. A comparison of methods for enumerating bacteria in direct fed microbials for animal feed. Journal of Microbiological Methods 160: 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2019.04.003
  40. Guarnaccia V., Crous P.W., 2017. Emerging citrus diseases in Europe caused by species of Diaporthe. IMA Fungus 8(2): 317–334. https://doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.02.07
  41. Guo L., Ye C., Cui L., Wan K., Chen S., … Yu X., 2019. Population and single-cell metabolic activity of UV-induced VBNC bacteria determined by CTC-FCM and D2O-labeled Raman spectroscopy. Environment International 130: 104883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.077
  42. Gusella G., Leonardi G.R., La Quatra G., Aiello D., Voglmayr H., Polizzi G., 2025. Re-evaluating the etiology of citrus “Dothiorella gummosis” in Italy. Plant Disease First Look. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-25-0441-RE
  43. Guzmán-Guzmán P., Etesami H., Santoyo G., 2025. Trichoderma: a multifunctional agent in plant health and microbiome interactions. BMC Microbiology 25: 434. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-04158-2
  44. Halleen F., Fourie P.H., Lombard P.J., 2010. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds against Eutypa lata by biological and chemical methods. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture 31(2): 125–132.
  45. Hallmann J., 2001. Plant interactions with endophytic bacteria. In: Biotic interactions in plant-pathogen associations (M. J. Jeger, N.J. Spence ed.), CAB International, Wallingford, United Kingdom, 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995120.0000
  46. Hardoim P.R., van Overbeek L.S., Berg G., Pirttilä A.M., Compant S., … Sessitsch, A., 2015. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 79(3): 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00050-14
  47. Huang F., Hou X., Dewdney M.M., Fu Y., Chen G., … Li, H., 2013. Diaporthe species occurring on citrus in China. Fungal Diversity 61: 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0245-6
  48. ISTAT, 2024. Available online at: http://dati.istat.it/ (accessed June 27, 2025).
  49. Jaklitsch W.M., Samuels G.J., Dodd S.L., Lu B.S., Druzhinina I.S., 2006. Hypocrea rufa/Trichoderma viride: a reassessment, and description of five closely related species with and without warted conidia. Studies in Mycology 56(1): 135–177. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2006.56.04
  50. Johansson A.H., Bejai S., Niazi A., Manzoor S., Bongcam-Rudloff E., Meijer J., 2014. Studies of plant colonisation by closely related Bacillus amyloliquefaciens biocontrol agents using strain-specific quantitative PCR assays. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 106: 1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0295-0
  51. John S., Wicks T. J., Hunt J. S., Lorimer M. F., Oakey H., Scott E. S., 2005. Protection of grapevine pruning wounds from infection by Eutypa lata using Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium lateritium. Australasian Plant Pathology 34(4): 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP05075
  52. Kalai-Grami L., Ben Slimane I., Mnari-Hattab M., Rezgui S., Aouani M.A., … Limam, F., 2014a. Protective effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens against infections of Citrus aurantium seedlings by Phoma tracheiphila. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 30(2): 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1471-5
  53. Kalai-Grami L., Saidi S., Bachkouel S., Slimene I.B., Mnari-Hattab M., … Limam, F., 2014b. Isolation and characterization of putative endophytic bacteria antagonistic to Phoma tracheiphila and Verticillium albo-atrum. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 174(1): 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1062-4
  54. Kalimutu P.K., Mahardika I.B.K., Sagung P.R.A.A.A., 2020. Antagonism test of Trichoderma atroviride and Gliocladium sp. Bali local isolates as a disease control of blendok disease (Botryodiplodia theobromae) in grapefruit (Citrus grandis L. Osbeck). SEAS (Sustainable Environment Agricultural Science) 4(2): 102–110. https://doi.org/10.22225/seas.4.2.2311.102-110
  55. Khuong N.Q., Nhien D.B., Thu L.T.M., Trong N.D., Hiep P.C., … Xuan, D.T., 2023. Using Trichoderma asperellum to antagonize Lasiodiplodia theobromae causing stem-end rot disease on pomelo (Citrus maxima). Journal of Fungi 9(10): 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9100981
  56. Kotze C., Van Niekerk J., Mostert L., Halleen F., Fourie P., 2011. Evaluation of biocontrol agents for grapevine pruning wound protection against trunk pathogen infection. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50: S247–S263.
  57. Kupper K.C., Corrêa É.B., Moretto C., Bettiol W., Goes A.D., 2011. Control of Guignardia citricarpa by Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma spp. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 33: 1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452011000400009
  58. Kupper K.C., Moretto R.K., Fujimoto A., 2019. Production of antifungal compounds by Bacillus spp. isolates and its capacity for controlling citrus black spot under field conditions. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 36(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-019-2772-0
  59. Labiadh M., Dhaouadi S., Chollet M., Chataigne G., Tricot C., … Kallel S., 2021. Antifungal lipopeptides from Bacillus strains isolated from rhizosphere of citrus trees. Rhizosphere 19: 100399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100399
  60. Lahlali R., Ezrari S., Radouane N., Kenfaoui J., Esmaeel Q., … Barka E.A., 2022. Biological control of plant pathogens: a global perspective. Microorganisms 10(3): 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030596
  61. Leonardi G.R., Aiello D., Camilleri G., Piattino V., Polizzi G., Guarnaccia V., 2023a. A new disease of kumquat (Fortunella margarita) caused by Colletotrichum karsti: twig and branch dieback. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 62(3): 333–348. https://doi.org/10.36253/phyto-14544
  62. Leonardi G.R., Polizzi G., Vitale A., Aiello D., 2023b. Efficacy of biological control agents and resistance inducer for control of Mal secco disease. Plants 12(9): 1735. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12091735
  63. Leonardi G.R., Vitale A., Mavica S., Catara V., Polizzi G., Aiello D., 2026. Efficacy of Trichoderma-based formulates against Mal secco disease of citrus. Organic Agriculture 16: 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-025-00542-4
  64. Li S., He P., Fan H., Liu L., Yin K., … Zheng, S.J., 2021. A real-time fluorescent reverse transcription quantitative PCR assay for rapid detection of genetic markers’ expression associated with Fusarium wilt of banana biocontrol activities in Bacillus. Journal of Fungi 7(5): 353. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7050353
  65. Liu Y.J., Whelen S., Hall B.D., 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16(12): 1799–1808. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092
  66. Liu S., Lou Y., Li Y., Zhang J., Li P., … Gu Q., 2022. Review of phytochemical and nutritional characteristics and food applications of Citrus L. fruits. Frontiers in Nutrition 9: 968604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.968604
  67. Lombardo M.F., Panebianco S., Azzaro A., Timpanaro G., Polizzi G., Cirvilleri G., 2024. Copper-alternative products to control anthracnose and Alternaria brown spot on fruit of Tarocco sweet oranges and lemon in Italy. Crop Protection 176: 106520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106520
  68. Lugtenberg B., Kamilova F., 2009. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 63(1): 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918
  69. Mathre D.E., Cook R.J., Callan N.W., 1999. From discovery to use: traversing the world of commercializing biocontrol agents for plant disease control. Plant Disease 83(11): 972–983. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.11.972
  70. Mayorquin J.S., Nouri M.T., Peacock B.B., Trouillas F.P., Douhan G.W., … Eskalen, A., 2019. Identification, pathogenicity, and spore trapping of Colletotrichum karstii associated with twig and shoot dieback in California. Plant Disease 103(7): 1464–1473. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-08-18-1425-re
  71. Mayorquin J.S., Wang D.H., Twizeyimana M., Eskalen A., 2016. Identification, distribution, and pathogenicity of Diatrypaceae and Botryosphaeriaceae associated with citrus branch canker in the southern California desert. Plant Disease 100(12): 2402–2413. https://doi.org/10.1094/pdis-03-16-0362-re
  72. McGuire R.G., 2000. Population dynamics of postharvest decay antagonists growing epiphytically and within wounds on grapefruit. Phytopathology 90(11): 1217–1223. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.11.1217
  73. Mendis H.C., Thomas V.P., Schwientek P., Salamzade R., Chien J.T., … De La Fuente, L., 2018. Strain-specific quantification of root colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus firmus I-1582 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713 in non-sterile soil and field conditions. PLoS One 13(2): e0193119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193119
  74. Ministero della Salute, 2025. Banca Dati dei Prodotti Fitosanitari. Available online at: www.fitosanitari.salute.gov.it (accessed January 20, 2025).
  75. Mohandoss J., Suryanarayanan T.S., 2009. Effect of fungicide treatment on foliar fungal endophyte diversity in mango. Sydowia 61(1): 11–24.
  76. Morawska L.P., Kuipers O.P., 2022. Antibiotic tolerance in environmentally stressed Bacillus subtilis: physical barriers and induction of a viable but nonculturable state. Microlife 3: uqac010. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsml/uqac010
  77. Muñoz-Guerrero J., Guerra-Sierra B.E., Alvarez J.C., 2021. Fungal endophytes of Tahiti lime (Citrus × latifolia) and their potential for control of Colletotrichum acutatum J.H. Simmonds causing anthracnose. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 9: 650351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.650351
  78. Mushtaq S., Shafiq M., Ashraf T., Haider M.S., Ashfaq M., Ali M., 2019. Characterization of plant growth-promoting activities of bacterial endophytes and their antibacterial potential isolated from citrus. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 29(4): 978–991.
  79. Mutawila C., Fourie P.H., Halleen F., Mostert L., 2011. Grapevine cultivar variation to pruning wound protection by Trichoderma species against trunk pathogens. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 50: S264–S276. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26458726
  80. Nascimento Brito V., Lana Alves J., Sírio Araújo K., de Souza Leite T., Borges de Queiroz C., … de Queiroz, M.V., 2023. Endophytic Trichoderma species from rubber trees native to the Brazilian Amazon, including four new species. Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1095199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1095199
  81. Nemec S., Datnoff L.E., Strandberg J., 1996. Efficacy of biocontrol agents in planting mixes to colonize plant roots and control root diseases of vegetables and citrus. Crop Protection 15(8): 735–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00048-8
  82. Ohr H.D., Munnecke D.E., Bricker J.L., 1972. Trichoderma spp. as modified by methyl bromide. Phytopathology 63: 965–973.
  83. Ojiambo P.S., Scherm H., 2006. Biological and application-oriented factors influencing plant disease suppression by biological control: a meta-analytical review. Phytopathology 96(11): 1168–1174. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-96-1168
  84. Phal P., Soytong K., Poeaim S., 2023. Natural product nanofibers derived from Trichoderma hamatum K01 to control citrus anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Open Agriculture 8(1): 20220193. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0193
  85. Piel C., Pouchieu C., Carles C., Beziat B., Boulanger M., … Renier, M., 2019. Agricultural exposures to carbamate herbicides and fungicides and central nervous system tumour incidence in the cohort AGRICAN. Environment International 130: 104876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.070
  86. Pinto D., Santos M.A., Chambel L., 2015. Thirty years of viable but nonculturable state research: unsolved molecular mechanisms. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 41(1): 61–76. https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.794127
  87. Polizzi G., Aiello D., Vitale A., Giuffrida F., Groenewald J.Z., Crous P.W., 2009. First report of shoot blight, canker, and gummosis caused by Neoscytalidium dimidiatum on citrus in Italy. Plant Disease 93(11): 1215–1215. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-11-1215A
  88. Postollec F., Falentin H., Pavan S., Combrisson J. and Sohier D., 2011. Recent advances in quantitative PCR (qPCR) applications in food microbiology. Food Microbiology, 28(5): 848–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.02.008
  89. Qiao M., Du X., Zhang Z., Xu J., Yu, Z., 2018. Three new species of soil-inhabiting Trichoderma from southwest China. MycoKeys 44: 63. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.44.30295
  90. Qiao W., Kang X., Ma X., Ran L., Zhen Z., 2024. New strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens G1 as a potential downy mildew biocontrol agent for grape. Agronomy, 14(7): 1532. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14071532
  91. Rodriguez R.J., White Jr. J.F., Arnold A.E., Redman R.A., 2009. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytologist 182(2): 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x
  92. Rotolo C., De Miccolis Angelini R.M., Pollastro S., Faretra F., 2016. A TaqMan-based qPCR assay for quantitative detection of the biocontrol agents Bacillus subtilis strain QST713 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum strain D747. BioControl 61(1): 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9701-4
  93. Rubio M.B., Hermosa M.R., Keck E., Monte E., 2005. Specific PCR assays for the detection and quantification of DNA from the biocontrol strain Trichoderma harzianum 2413 in soil. Microbial Ecology 49(1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-003-0171-3
  94. Sandoval-Denis M., Guarnaccia V., Polizzi G., Crous P.W., 2018. Symptomatic citrus trees reveal a new pathogenic lineage in Fusarium and two new Neocosmospora species. Persoonia 40(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.01
  95. Sarrocco S., Esteban P., Vicente I., Bernardi R., Plainchamp T., … Dufresne, M., 2021. Straw competition and wheat root endophytism of Trichoderma gamsii T6085 as useful traits in the biological control of Fusarium head blight. Phytopathology 111(7): 1129–1136. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-20-0441-R
  96. Savazzini F., Longa C.M.O., Pertot I., Gessler C., 2008. Real-time PCR for detection and quantification of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 in soil. Journal of Microbiological Methods 73(2): 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.02.004
  97. Scott K., Konkel Z., Gluck-Thaler E., Valero David G.E., Simmt C.F., … Slot, J., 2023. Endophyte genomes support greater metabolic gene cluster diversity compared with non-endophytes in Trichoderma. PLoS One 18(12): e0289280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289280
  98. Silvia M., 2021. Application of Trichoderma as an alternative to the use of sulfuric acid pesticides in the control of Diplodia disease on pomelo citrus. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 11 November, 2020, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 819(1): 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/819/1/012007
  99. Solel Z., Salerno M., 2000. Mal secco. In: Compendium of Citrus Diseases (L.W. Timmer, S.M. Garnsey, J.H. Graham, ed.), 2nd ed. American Phytopathological Society, Saint Paul, MN, 33–35.
  100. Somerville T.F., Corless C.E., Sueke H., Neal T., Kaye S.B., 2020. 16S ribosomal RNA PCR versus conventional diagnostic culture in the investigation of suspected bacterial keratitis. Translational Vision Science and Technology 9(13): 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.13.2
  101. Stummer B.E., Zhang Q., Zhang X., Warren R.A., Harvey P.R., 2020. Quantification of Trichoderma afroharzianum, Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma gamsii inoculants in soil, the wheat rhizosphere and in planta suppression of the crown rot pathogen Fusarium pseudograminearum. Journal of Applied Microbiology 129(4): 971–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14670
  102. Su Z., Liu G., Li C., Liu X., Guo Q., … Qu, Y., 2024. Establishment and application of quantitative detection of Bacillus velezensis HMB26553, a biocontrol agent against cotton damping‐off caused by Rhizoctonia. Biotechnology Journal 19(2): 2300412. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202300412
  103. Sung G.H., Sung J.M., Hywel-Jones N.L., Spatafora J.W., 2007. A multi-gene phylogeny of Clavicipitaceae (Ascomycota Fungi): identification of localized incongruence using a combinational bootstrap approach. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44(3): 1204–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.011
  104. Tan Q., Zhang Y., Zhou T., Xiong Y., Huang Q., … Manawasinghe I., 2025. Endophytic Trichoderma (Sordariomycetes, Hypocreaceae) species associated with citrus in Guangdong province, China. New Zealand Journal of Botany 63(2–3): 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.2024.2445352
  105. Timmer L.W., Roberts P.D., Darhower H.M., Bushong P.M., Stover E.W., … Ibáñez, A.M., 2000. Epidemiology and control of citrus greasy spot in different citrus-growing areas in Florida. Plant Disease 84(12): 1294–1298. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.12.1294
  106. Timmer L.W., Garnsey S.M., Grahameditors J.H., 2000. Compendium of Citrus Diseases. 2nd edition. American Phytopathological Society, APS Press, St. Paul, MN, USA, 92 pp.
  107. Timofeeva A.M., Galyamova M.R., Sedykh S.E., 2023. Plant growth-promoting bacteria of soil: designing of consortia beneficial for crop production. Microorganisms 11(12): 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11122864
  108. Torsvik V., Øvreås L., 2002. Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Current Opinion in Microbiology 5(3): 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7
  109. Triantafyllidis V., Zotos A., Kosma C., Kokkotos E., 2020. Environmental implications from long-term citrus cultivation and wide use of Cu fungicides in Mediterranean soils. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 231(5): 218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04577-z
  110. Tseng Y-H., Rouina H., Groten K., Rajani P., Furch A.C.U., … Oelmüller R., 2020. An endophytic Trichoderma strain promotes growth of its hosts and defends against pathogen attack. Frontiers in Plant Science 11: 573670. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.573670
  111. Vitale A., Aiello D., Azzaro A., Guarnaccia V., Polizzi G., 2021. An eleven-year survey on field disease susceptibility of citrus accessions to Colletotrichum and Alternaria species. Agriculture 11(6): 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060536
  112. Vu T.X., Tran V. T., 2020. Isolation and characterization of Trichoderma strains antagonistic against pathogenic fungi on orange crops. VNU Journal of Science: Natural Sciences and Technology 36(3): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1140/vnunst.5086
  113. Wang H., Zhang R., Duan Y., Jiang W., Chen X., Shen X., Yin C., Mao Z., 2021. The endophytic strain Trichoderma asperellum 6S-2: an efficient biocontrol agent against apple replant disease in china and a potential plant-growth-promoting fungus. Journal of Fungi 7: 1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121050
  114. Wang L., Zhao X., Chu J., Li Y., Li Y., … Zhong Q., 2011. Application of an improved loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus from various seafood samples. African Journal of Microbiology Research 5(31): 5765–5771. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR11.1237
  115. Weideman H., Wehner F.C., 1993. Greenhouse evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Fusarium oxysporum for biological control of citrus root rot in soils naturally and artificially infested with Phytophthora nicotianae. Phytophylactica 25(2): 101–106.
  116. Whipps J.M., 2001. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany 52(suppl_1): 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.suppl_1.487
  117. Woo S.L., Hermosa R., Lorito M., Monte E., 2023. Trichoderma: a multipurpose, plant-beneficial microorganism for eco-sustainable agriculture. Nature Reviews Microbiology 21(5): 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-022-00819-5
  118. Xie S., Yu H., Wang Q., Cheng Y., Ding T., 2020. Two rapid and sensitive methods based on TaqMan qPCR and droplet digital PCR assay for quantitative detection of Bacillus subtilis in rhizosphere. Journal of Applied Microbiology 128(2): 518–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14481
  119. Xu X., Fagg G., Passey T., 2025. Population dynamics of three commercial biocontrol organisms on strawberry plants grown in coir substrate under protection. Plant Pathology 74(5): 1302–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.14093
  120. Xu H., Yan L., Zhang M., Chang X., Zhu D., … Chen W., 2022. Changes in the density and composition of rhizosphere pathogenic Fusarium and beneficial Trichoderma contributing to reduced root rot of intercropped soybean. Pathogens 11(4): 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11040478
  121. Xu Z., Li L., Alam M. J., Zhang L., Yamasaki S., Shi L., 2008a. First confirmation of integron-bearing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Current Microbiology 57(3): 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9187-8
  122. Xu Z., Shi L., Alam M.J., Li L., Yamasaki S., 2008b. Integron-bearing methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in South China, 2001–2004. FEMS Microbiology Letters 278(2): 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00994.x
  123. Zanfaño L., Carro-Huerga G., Rodríguez-González Á., Mayo-Prieto S., Cardoza R.E., … Casquero P.A., 2024. Trichoderma carraovejensis: a new species from vineyard ecosystem with biocontrol abilities against grapevine trunk disease pathogens and ecological adaptation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15: 1388841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1388841
  124. Zhou Z., Lu S., Liu T., Liu J., Deng J., … Yi T., 2024. Biocontrol of citrus melanose Diaporthe citri by Bacillus subtilis M23. Biological Control 197: 105608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2024.105608