No. 1 (2024): (Re)producing everyday life
Ricerche

From Terrain Vague to Vague Farm: Cultivating Urban Vacant Land through Practices of Commoning

Lorenzo Stefano Iannizzotto
ISCTE-IUL Lisbon
Bio
Alexandra Paio
ISCTE-University institute of Lisbon
Bio
Camilla Perrone
Università degli Studi di Firenze
Bio

Published 2024-11-25

Keywords

  • Terrain Vague,
  • Vacant Land,
  • everyday urbanism,
  • urban commons,
  • agriculture

How to Cite

Iannizzotto, L. S., Paio, A., & Perrone, C. (2024). From Terrain Vague to Vague Farm: Cultivating Urban Vacant Land through Practices of Commoning. Contesti. Città, Territori, Progetti, (1), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.36253/contest-15282

Abstract

Different strands of scientific literature use various terminologies to refer to types of urban spaces without productive function, abandoned and legally uncontrolled. These include at least the following three: “Terrain Vague”, “vacant lot”, and “urban voids”. Although different, they all similarly evoke spaces where emptiness prevails over fullness and is in a perpetual state of suspension. These spaces, because of their characteristics and their temporary complete availability, are used daily by different communities, spontaneously and informally, through different appropriations and uses, and by nature, where species not allowed elsewhere and in the absence of human control find refuge, unusual encounters can occur. Over the last twenty years, a series of projects, activities and practices have begun to emerge in these spaces, such as especially recent park and garden projects in Europe, that retain or incorporate spontaneous vegetation, undefined functions, and a wild aesthetic, reflecting a growing interest in and new appreciation of these spaces, particularly among landscape architects. Among these types of projects and initiatives, those that we will define here as Vague Farm, undoubtedly stand out. By this term, we refer to projects and initiatives that, while mainly based on the creation and management of urban garden and activities related to agriculture and local food production, also aim to preserve some of the informal and spontaneous characteristics of the previous Terrain Vague. This paper proposes a first attempt at defining Vague Farms, through the analysis of five case studies intentionally chosen from different European cities, to show the simultaneous emergence of these practices. To achieve this, it proposes: i) a brief theoretical introduction to Terrain Vague and its relationship with agriculture and communing (theoretical background); ii) a reading of these community urban gardens projects through the lenses of Urban Commons (observed experiences and results); iii) a proposal of a definition of vague farms projects and their characteristics (discussion).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. A Firenze rinasce la Fattoria dei ragazzi con nuovi spazi per orti e animali. (2023, November 22). Toscana Chianti Ambiente, informazione indipendente: news, notizie, eventi di ecologia della regione. https://www.toscanachiantiambiente.it/a-firenze-rinasce-la-fattoria-dei-ragazzi-con-nuovi-spazi-per-orti-e-animali/
  2. Afonso, C. B., & Melo, P. M. de. (2023). An indigenous horticultural project in Rio de Janeiro as a gap in formal urban space: The case of the Dja Guata Porã Garden. CIDADES, Comunidades e Territórios, 47, Article 47. https://revistas.rcaap.pt/cct/article/view/29897
  3. Berger, A. (2006). Drosscape: Wasting land in urban America. Princeton Architectural Press.
  4. Borch, C., & Kornberger, M. (2015). Urban commons: Rethinking the city. Routledge.
  5. Bowman, A. O., & Pagano, M. A. (2004). Terra incognita: Vacant land and urban strategies. Georgetown University Press.
  6. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2011). Planetary urbanisation. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban Constellations. Jovis.
  7. Brito-henriques, E. (2018). The recent ruins of Lisbon: Exploring the emotions of abandonment. 1.
  8. Brito-Henriques, E., & Morgado, P. (2017). A Methodology for Identification and Analysis of City Shrinkage Effects in Urban Morphology and Landscape. International Scientific Conference GEOBALCANICA 2017 A, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.18509/gbp.2017.18
  9. Certeau, M. de. (2011). The Practice of Everyday Life (S. Rendall, Trans.; 3rd ed.). University of California Press.
  10. Chase, J., Kaliski, J., & Crawford, M. (1999). Everyday Urbanism. The Monacelli Press.
  11. Dellenbaugh-Losse, M., Zimmermann, N.-E., & de Vires, N. (2018). The Urban Commons Cookbook.
  12. Foster, S. R., & Iaione, C. (2022). Co-Cities: Innovative Transitions toward Just and Self-Sustaining Communities. The MIT Press.
  13. Gandy, M. (2011). Interstitial Landscapes: Reflections on a Berlin corner. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban Constellations (pp. 149–153). Jovis.
  14. Gandy, M. (2013). Marginalia: Aesthetics, Ecology, and Urban Wastelands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(6), 1301–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.832105
  15. Gandy, M. (2022). Natura Urbana. Ecological Constellations in Urban Space. MIT Press.
  16. Iannizzotto, L. S. (2023). Urban Wilderness: A Journey through Lisbon Terrain Vague. SCOPIO MAGAZINE ARCHITECTURE, ART AND IMAGE, 1(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.24840/1647-8274_2023-0001_0001_2
  17. Kamvasinou, K. (2006). Vague parks: The politics of the late twentieth-century urban landscapes. Architectural Research Quarterly, 10 (3-4), 255–262.
  18. Kamvasinou, K. (2014a). Reimagining Interim Landscapes. In Emerging Landscapes. Routledge.
  19. Kamvasinou, K. (2014b, December 16). Abbey Gardens. Interim Spaces and Creative Use. https://interimspacescreativeuse.wordpress.com/abbey-gardens/
  20. Kamvasinou, K. (2018). Documenting interim spaces as 21st century heritage. AMPS Proceedings Series, 15 (1), 92–100.
  21. Kamvasinou, K. (2020). Experiencing interim landscapes: Ephemerality and place-making. Revealing Change in Cultural Landscapes: Material, Spatial and Ecological Considerations, September, 34–45.
  22. Kremer, E., & Medeşan, S. (2017). Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Mănăștur Central—Cinema Dacia—Developing a concept for a new community center in a vacant cinema in a large scale housing district using a participatory process. https://www.academia.edu/34004180/Cluj_Napoca_Romania_M%C4%83n%C4%83%C8%99tur_Central_Cinema_Dacia_Developing_a_concept_for_a_new_community_center_in_a_vacant_cinema_in_a_large_scale_housing_district_using_a_participatory_process
  23. La Fattoria dei ragazzi diventa più grande—La Repubblica. (n.d.). Retrieved April 13, 2024, from https://firenze.repubblica.it/cronaca/2022/12/23/news/firenze_isolotto_la_fattoria_dei_ragazzi_centro_eco_didattico_isolotto-380338564/
  24. Lefebvre, H. (2008). Critique of Everyday Life, Vol. 1. Verso.
  25. Lévesque, L. (2001). The «terrain vague» as material: Some observations. Paysages, (Newsletter of the Association Des Architectes Paysagistes Du Québec), Montréal, 16–18.
  26. Lopez-Pineiro, S. (2020). A Glossary of Urban Voids. Jovis.
  27. Magalhães, B. (2023, May 9). Primeira edição do Festival Regador chega à Penha de França este fim-de-semana. Time Out Lisboa. https://www.timeout.pt/lisboa/pt/noticias/primeira-edicao-do-festival-regador-chega-a-penha-de-franca-este-fim-de-semana-050923
  28. Marat-Mendes, T., Borges, J. C., Lopes, S. S., & Pereira, M. M. (2021). Where the fields have no name: Urban-rural transitions in the Lisbon Region planning history. Cidades, 41(41), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.15847/CCT.20497
  29. Mariani, M., & Barron, P. (2014). Terrain Vague. Interstices at the Edge of the Pale (M. Mariani & P. Barron, Eds.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203522172
  30. Medeşan, S. (n.d.-a). A Shared Space in Mănăștur Neighborhood (Cluj-Napoca, Romania). Retrieved April 11, 2024, from https://www.academia.edu/30153766/A_Shared_Space_in_M%C4%83n%C4%83%C8%99tur_Neighborhood_Cluj_Napoca_Romania_
  31. Medeşan, S. (n.d.-b). ’La Terenuri’[At the Playgrounds]—From the construction of situations to common spaces. Retrieved April 11, 2024, from https://www.academia.edu/31138927/La_Terenuri_At_the_Playgrounds_from_the_construction_of_situations_to_common_spaces
  32. Medeşan, S. (2015). At the Fields - Common Space in Mănăștur Neighborhood (Cluj-Napoca, Romania). A laboratory for participatory urbanism and community involvement Text: Silviu Medeșan, Laura Panait. https://www.academia.edu/30153765/At_the_Fields_Common_Space_in_M%C4%83n%C4%83%C8%99tur_Neighborhood_Cluj_Napoca_Romania_A_laboratory_for_participatory_urbanism_and_community_involvement_Text_Silviu_Mede%C8%99an_Laura_Panait
  33. Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável—Plataforma Municipal—Horta Alto da Eira—Associação Regador. (n.d.). Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://odslocal.pt/projetos/horta-alto-da-eira-associacao-regador--947
  34. Perrone, C., Giallorenzo, F., & Rossi, M. (Eds.). (2022). Social and Institutional Innovation in Self-Organising Cities (1st ed.). Firenze University Press. https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-539-4
  35. Petcou, C., & Petrescu, D. (2015). R-URBAN or how to co-produce a resilient city. Ephemera: Theory and Politics of Organisation, 15(1), 249–262.
  36. Petcou, C., & Petrescu, D. (2020). R-Urban: Strategies and Tactics for Participative Utopias and Resilient Practices. Green Utopianism, 270–290. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203067215-25
  37. Petrescu, D., & Petcou, C. (2023). The role of architects in initiating, sustaining and defending urban commons in mass housing estates: R-Urban in Grand Ensembles. Journal of Architecture, 28(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2183619
  38. Petrescu, D., Petcou, C., Safri, M., & Gibson, K. (2021). Calculating the value of the commons: Generating resilient urban futures. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(3), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1890
  39. Poli, D. (2016). Rivoluzione alimentare e parchi agricoli multifunzionali nella piana fiorentina. ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE, 2, 70–91. https://doi.org/10.3280/ES2016-002006
  40. Regador: Uma horta no coração de lisboa. (n.d.). Blimunda. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://blimunda.josesaramago.org/regador-uma-horta-no-coracao-de-lisboa/
  41. Rinasce la Fattoria dei ragazzi, laboratorio a cielo aperto di educazione e sostenibilità. (2023, November 21). La Nazione. https://www.lanazione.it/firenze/cronaca/fattoria-dei-ragazzi-c18a9027
  42. Soares, A. L., Azambuja, S. T., Brito-Henriques, E., & Simões, A. R. (2017). Vacant land in city: Potential functional, ecological and aesthetic role in the urban landscape. ECLAS Conference 2017 / Proceedings, Creation/Reaction/.
  43. Solà-Morales, I. de. (1995). Terrain Vague. In Cynthia Davidson (Ed.), Anyplace (pp. 118–123). MIT Press.
  44. Speaks, M., Crawford, M., & Kelbaugh, D. (2005). Everyday Urbanism: Michigan Debates on Urbanism I (R. Mehrotra, Ed.). University of Michigan, Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning.
  45. Stavrides, S. (2014). Open Space Appropriations and the Potentialities of a “City of Thresholds.” In M. Mariani & P. Baron (Eds.), Terrain Vague: Interstices at the Edge of the Pale. Routledge.
  46. Stavrides, S. (2016). Common Space The City as Commons. Zed Books London.
  47. Travasso, N. (2022). Baldios: Res communis. https://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/handle/10216/144770
  48. Tripodi, L. (2011). EVERYDAY LIFE IN THE SEGMENTED CITY: AN INTRODUCTION. In C. Perrone & G. Manella (Eds.), Everyday Life in the Segmented City. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  49. Una vera fattoria dedicata a bambini e ragazzi Per coltivare frutta e verdura e allevare animali. (2022, February 25). La Nazione. https://www.lanazione.it/firenze/cronaca/una-vera-fattoria-dedicata-a-bambini-e-ragazzi-per-coltivare-frutta-e-verdura-e-allevare-animali-d342b852
  50. Urban Commons Research Collettive, U. C. R. (2022). Urban Commons Handbook (1st edition). Dpr-Barcelona.