Vol. 78 No. 2 (2023)
Digitalisation and just transition - Research Articles

Digitalisation in rural areas: exploring perspectives and main challenges ahead

PDF
  • Sabrina Arcuri,
  • Gianluca Brunori,
  • Silvia Rolandi
Sabrina Arcuri
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa
Gianluca Brunori
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa
Silvia Rolandi
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14368

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • rural areas,
  • digital divide,
  • rural policy,
  • governance,
  • digitalisation

How to Cite

Arcuri, S., Brunori, G., & Rolandi, S. (2023). Digitalisation in rural areas: exploring perspectives and main challenges ahead. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 78(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14368

Copyright (c) 2023 Sabrina Arcuri, Gianluca Brunori, Silvia Rolandi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper offers a comprehensive critical review on digitalisation in rural areas, drawing on international and EU policies, scientific and grey literature and real-life examples from two European H2020 research projects. In doing so, it aims at providing a basic conceptual framework encompassing three main intervention areas, with relative sub-themes, identified as relevant for rural areas, namely: the rural digital divide, the attractiveness of rural areas and opportunities for strengthening local governance. For each of these broad themes, the role of digital tools is explored and supported by case study examples providing valuable insights and real-life applications in rural settings.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Aissaoui N. (2022). The digital divide: a literature review and some directions for future research in light of COVID-19. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 71(8/9): 686-708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2020-0075
  2. Arcuri S. (2023). Digitalisation in rural areas. SHERPA Position Paper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7773476
  3. Bell D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. In: Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P. (eds.), Handbook of rural studies, 149-160. London: Sage.
  4. Bock B.B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia ruralis, 56(4): 552-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119
  5. Bosworth G., Whalley J., Fuzi A., Merrell I., Chapman P., Russell E. (2023). Rural co-working: New network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside. Journal of Rural Studies, 97: 550-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003
  6. Brunori G. (2022). Agriculture and rural areas facing the “twin transition”: principles for a sustainable rural digitalisation. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 77(3): 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13983
  7. Brunori G., Nieto E., Casares B., Debruyne L., Tisenkopfs T., Brunori A. (2021). Experts’ recommendations to boost sustainable digitalisation of agriculture, forestry and rural areas by 2040. February 2021.
  8. Cowie P., Townsend L., Salemink K. (2020). Smart rural futures: Will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution?. Journal of rural studies, 79: 169-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042
  9. EIP-AGRI S.P. (2017). Horizon 2020 Multi-actor Projects. Brussels: EIP-AGRI Service Point.
  10. ENRD (2018). EU Rural Review “Smart villages. Revitalisng rural services”, No. 26.
  11. ENRD (2021). EU Rural Review “Long-term visions for rural areas”, No. 32.
  12. European Commission (2019). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION The European Green Deal. Brussels, 11.12.2019 COM(2019) 640 final.
  13. European Commission (2021). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS. A long-term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas - Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040 {SWD(2021) 166 final} - {SWD(2021) 167 final}.
  14. European Commission (2021a). COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A long- term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas - Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040 {COM(2021) 345 final} - {SWD(2021) 167 final}.
  15. European Commission (2021b). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS. 2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade. Brussels, 9.3.2021 COM(2021) 118 final.
  16. European Commission (2022). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Establishing a European Declaration on Digital rights and principles for the Digital Decade {SWD(2022) 14 final}.
  17. Ferrari A., Bacco M., Gaber K., Jedlitschka A., Hess S., Kaipainen J., Koltsida P., Toli E., Brunori G. (2022). Drivers, barriers and impacts of digitalisation in rural areas from the viewpoint of experts. Information and Software Technology, 145, 106816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106816
  18. Flores-Crespo P., Bermudez-Edo M., Garrido J.L. (2022). Smart tourism in Villages: Challenges and the Alpujarra Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, 204: 663-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.080
  19. Gaál M., Bálint C. (2022). MAP Position Paper (Hungary) - Digitalisation in rural areas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7244027
  20. Gerli P., Whalley J. (2021). Fibre to the countryside: A comparison of public and community initiatives tackling the rural digital divide in the UK. Telecommunications Policy, 45(10), 102222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102222
  21. Gkartzios M., Lowe P. (2019). Revisiting Neo-Endogenous Rural Development. In: Scott M., Gallent N., Gkartzios M. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning. Routledge: New York.
  22. Goodwin-Hawkins B. (2020). Coronavirus holidays stoke rural fury. The Conversation. April 10, 2020.
  23. Grzyś P. (2022). Geodesign in Rural Poland. Practice abstract. Digitalisation: needs and impacts. (May 2022).
  24. Lawrence M.G., Williams S., Nanz P., Renn O. (2022). Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth, 5(1): 44-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.010
  25. Lindberg J., Lundgren A.S. (2022). The affective atmosphere of rural life and digital healthcare: Understanding older persons’ engagement in eHealth services. Journal of Rural Studies, 95: 77-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.07.020
  26. Malecki E.J. (2003). Digital development in rural areas: potentials and pitfalls. Journal of rural studies, 19(2): 201-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00068-2
  27. Mendes M., Santos P. (2022). MAP Position Paper (Centro, Portugal) - Digitalisation in rural areas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7266457
  28. OECD (2006). The New Rural Paradigm. Policies and Governance. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264023918-en
  29. OECD (2018). “Bridging the rural digital divide”. OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 265. OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/852bd3b9-en
  30. OECD (2019). OECD Regional Outlook 2019: Leveraging Megatrends for Cities and Rural Areas. OECD Publishing, Paris
  31. OECD (2020). Policy implications of coronavirus crisis for rural development, 16 June.
  32. Rijswijk K., Klerkx L., Bacco M., Bartolini F., Bulten E., Debruyne L., Dessein J., Scotti I., Brunori G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85: 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003
  33. Rolandi S., Brunori G., Bacco M., Scotti I. (2021). The digitalization of agriculture and rural areas: Towards a taxonomy of the impacts. Sustainability, 13(9), 5172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095172
  34. Salemink K., Strijker D., Bosworth G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54: 360-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
  35. Slätmo E., Löfving L. (2022). MAP Position Paper (Sweden) - Digitalisation in rural areas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7300362
  36. Slätmo E., Oliveira e Costa S., Eliasen S.Q., Miller D., Piter L., Kull M., Potters J. (2021). Methods for setting-up of MAPs. Deliverable 5.1. in H2020 Coordination and Support Action SHERPA: Sustainable Hub to Engage into Rural Policies with Actors. Report to the European Commission. Pp. 31 September 2021.
  37. SMARTA (no date). Sustainable shared mobility interconnected with public transport in European rural areas. Project website: https://ruralsharedmobility.eu/
  38. Stjernberg M., Salonen H. (eds.) (2022). MAP Position Paper (Finland) - Digitalisation in rural areas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7235125
  39. Tindale S., Vicario-Modrono V., Gallardo-Cobos R., Hunter E., Miškolci S., Newell Price P., Sánchez-Zamora P., Sonnevelt M., Ojo M., McInnes K., Frewer L.J. (2023). Citizen perceptions and values associated with ecosystem services from European grassland landscapes. Land Use Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106574
  40. Townsend L., Duckett D. (2022). Digitalisation impacts for a crofting Community in Scotland. Practice abstract. Digitalisation: needs and impacts (May 2022).
  41. Tranos E. (2012). The causal effect of the internet infrastructure on the economic development of European city regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(3): 319-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.694140
  42. UN-Habitat (2022). FROM SMART cities TO SMART villages. Strengthening Urban-Rural Linkages through SMART approaches.
  43. Van Dijk J., Hacker K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The information society, 19(4): 315-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240309487
  44. Wallace C., Vincent K., Luguzan C., Townsend L., Beel D. (2017). Information technology and social cohesion: A tale of two villages. Journal of Rural Studies, 54: 426-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.005
  45. White M. (2022). Digitalisation & resilient rural livelihoods in Cloughjordan Ecovillage, Ireland. Practice abstract. Digitalisation: needs and impacts (May 2022).
  46. Willis C. (2015). The contribution of cultural ecosystem services to understanding the tourism-nature-wellbeing nexus. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 10: 38-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.06.002
  47. Woods M. (2019). The future of rural places. In: The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning (pp. 622-632). Routledge.
  48. World Bank (2021). World Development Report 2021: Data for Better Lives. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  49. Zerrer N., Sept A. (2020). Smart villagers as actors of digital social innovation in rural areas. Urban Planning, 5(4): 78-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i4.3183