Just Accepted Manuscripts
Research Articles

The contributions of Rural Districts to the Long-Term Vision for Rural Areas: the case of the Tuscany Region

Just Accepted
  • Fabiana Stortini,
  • Michele Moretti,
  • Gianluca Brunori
Fabiana Stortini
University of Pisa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15622

Published 2025-03-17

Keywords

  • rural areas,
  • rural district,
  • network governance,
  • LTVRA

How to Cite

Stortini, F., Moretti, M., & Brunori, G. (2025). The contributions of Rural Districts to the Long-Term Vision for Rural Areas: the case of the Tuscany Region. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA). https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15622

Copyright (c) 2025 Fabiana Stortini, Michele Moretti, Gianluca Brunori

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The Long-Term Vision for Rural Areas (LTVRA) pointed out that rural areas require an appropriate form of governance to avoid fragmentation and ensure the integration of rural policies. Recently, Italian law stressed the importance of Food Districts (FDs), including Rural Districts (RDs), to cope with rural challenges. Under the network governance perspective, this article explores internal and external barriers and the contribution of RDs to the LTVRA in the Tuscany Region. Following a desk analysis, the findings provide an overview of the main interventions contributing to the ten goals set by the LTVRA through different paths. The case study exhibits the flexibility of RDs in terms of geographical areas, predominant specialisations, actors involved, and fields of action, which characterise a clear ambition to promote a network-based and inclusive approach to rural development. The article suggests further investigation into the development of monitoring frameworks capable of optimising the structure of RDs and decision-making processes, capitalising on the inclusive capability network governance models to account for the needs and development visions of local actors.

Just Accepted

Downloads

Metrics

No metrics found.

References

  1. Ahlmeyer F., Volgmann K. (2023). What Can We Expect for the Development of Rural Areas in Europe? — Trends of the Last Decade and Their Opportunities for Rural Regeneration. Sustainability, 15(6), 5485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065485.
  2. Ansell C., Torfing J. (2022). Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.
  3. Berti G., Belletti G., Toccaceli D., Arcuri S. (2023). Territorial food governance in the making: towards the Food Roundtable of Tuscany Region. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 78(3): 51-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14776.
  4. Bock B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards endogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4): 552-573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12119.
  5. Brunori G., Rossi A. (2007). Differentiating countryside: Social representations and governance patterns in rural areas with high social density: The case of Chianti, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2): 183-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.001.
  6. Broto V.C. (2017). Urban governance and the politics of climate change. World Development, 93: 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031.
  7. Chobotova V., Kluvankova-Oravska T. (2006). Shifting Governance in Slovensky Raj National Park. Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources. Discussion Papers 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.18834.
  8. Del Giudice T. (2024). The new challenges of agricultural policy: new actors and redefined development paradigms. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 79/(2): 3-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15365.
  9. European Commission (2021). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions a Long-Term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas - Towards stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas by 2040. COM (2021) 345 final, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu.
  10. European Commission (2024). The Long-Term Vision for the EU’s Rural Areas: key achievements and ways forward. COM (2024) 450 final, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu.
  11. Joint Research Centre (2021). Scenarios for EU Rural Areas 2040: Contribution to European Commission’s Long-Term Vision for Rural Areas. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/29388.
  12. European Network for Rural Development Thematic Group on Rural Revitalisation (2022). Enabling factors for rural revitalisation & a self-assessment tool for policy design. https://ec.europa.eu.
  13. Fanfani R., Montresor E., Pecci F. (2018). Dai distretti rurali e agroalimentari di qualità ai distretti del cibo. Rete Rurale Magazine, (5): 42-43. https://www.reterurale.it.
  14. Georgios C., Barraí H. (2023). Social innovation in rural governance: A comparative case study across the marginalised rural EU. Journal of Rural Studies, 99: 193-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.004.
  15. Goodwin M. (1998). The governance of rural areas: Some emerging research issues and agendas. Journal of Rural Studies, 14 (1): 5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(97)00043-0.
  16. Hertting N., Vedung E. (2012). Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary takes us?. Evaluation, 18(1): 27-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389011431021.
  17. Kapucu N., Hu Q. (2020). Network governance: concepts, theories and applications. Routledge. New York and London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351056540.
  18. Klijn E.H. (2008). Governance and governance network in Europe: an assessment of 10 years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10 (4): 505-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802263954.
  19. Kooiman J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Sage, Newbury Park.
  20. Lamine C., Pugliese P., Barataud F., Berti G., Rossi A. (2023). Italian biodistricts and French territorial food projects: how science-policy experience interplays shape the framings of transitions towards sustainable territorial food systems. Frontiers Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1223270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1223270.
  21. La Sala P., Tarangioli S., Briamonte L., Tomassini S. (2023). La Rete Rurale per il cibo italiano: i Distretti. Creafuturo. https://creafuturo.crea.gov.it/10664/.
  22. La Sala P. (2024). Fabbisogni di intervento e prospettive di sviluppo dei Distretti del Cibo. Proceedings of the Conference “Territories that nourish”. Turin. https://www.visitpiemonte
  23. Lavenex S. (2008). A governance perspective on the European neighbourhood policy: integration beyond conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6): 938-955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802196879.
  24. Lewis J.M. (2011). The future of network governance research: strength in diversity and synthesis. Public Administration, 89(4): 1221-1234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01876.x.
  25. Mazzocchi C., Orsi L., Bergamelli C., Sturla A. (2021). Bio-districts and the territory: evidence from a regression approach. AESTIMUM, (79): 5-23. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36253/aestim-12163.
  26. Meloni B., Farinella D. (2013). Sviluppo rurale alla prova. Dal territorio alle politiche. Rosenberg & Sellier.
  27. Morrison T.H. (2014). Developing a regional governance index: the institutional potential of rural regiones. Journal of Rural Studies (35): 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.04.004.
  28. Moynihan D.P. (2009). The Network Governance of Crisis Response: Case Studies of Incident Command Systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4): 895-915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun033.
  29. Müller S.M. (2024). Two qualitative case studies on network governance in Swiss transit station district development. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101155.
  30. Murdoch J. (2000). Networks – a new paradigm of rural development?. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(4): 407-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(00)00022-X.
  31. Navdeep M., Skelcher C. (2007). Evaluating democratic performance: methodologies for assessing the relationship between network governance and citizens. Public Administration Review, 67(2): 228-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00709.x.
  32. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2006). The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. OECD Rural Policy Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264023918-en.
  33. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017). Multi-level Governance Reforms: Overview of OECD Country Experiences. OECD Multi-level Governance Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264272866-en.
  34. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2020). Rural Well-being: Geography of Opportunities. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/d25cef80-en.
  35. Ovaska U., Vihinen H., Oostindie H., Farinós J., Hrabar M., Kilis E., Kobal J., Tisenkopfs T., Vulto H. (2021). Network Governance Arrangements and Rural-Urban Synergy. Sustainability, 13(5), 2952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052952.
  36. Powell W.W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In: Staw B.M., Cummings L.L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. 12: 295-336. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  37. Pertoldi M., Fioretti C., Guzzo F., Testori G., De Bruijn M., Ferry M., Kah S., Servillo L.A., Windisch S. (2022). Handbook of Territorial and Local Development Strategies. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/133519.
  38. Pheungpha N., Supriyono B., Wijaya A.F., Sujarwoto S. (2019). Modes of Network Governance in Disaster Reliefs: Case of Bangkok Flood Relief 2011. Public Administration, 6: 77-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2019-0-6-77-93.
  39. Romão G.A., Najberg E. (2023). Governança de redes e políticas públicas de sustentabilidade. REUNIR Revista de Administração Contabilidade e Sustentabilidade, 13(3): 216-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18696/reunir.v13i3.1486.
  40. Saldaña J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications, London.
  41. Shucksmith M. (2010). Neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia Ruralis, 50: 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.
  42. Sørensen E., Torfing J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Science, 28(3): 195-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x.
  43. Sørensen E., Torfing J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625006.
  44. Stoker G. (1998). Governance as Theory: Five Propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50: 17-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106.
  45. Tarangioli S. (2024). Distretti del cibo: una prima analisi. Proceedings of the Conference “Territories that nourish”, Turin, https://www.visitpiemonte.
  46. Tarangioli S., Henke R., Mazzocchi G., Cisilino F., Licciardo F. (2024). From needs to policy action: Italian agri-food districts as a case of territorial cooperation. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(10), 5914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.5914.
  47. Territorial Agenda 2030 (2020). A future for all places. https://territorialagenda.eu
  48. Termeer C.J.A.M., Dewulf A. (2012). Towards theoretical multiplicity for the governance of transitions: The energy-producing greenhouse case. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2): 37-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2012.044033.
  49. Toccaceli D. (2012). “Dai distretti alle reti? I distretti in agricoltura nell’interpretazione delle Regioni e le prospettive verso il 2020”, Rete Rurale Nazionale 2007-2013. https://www.researchgate.net.
  50. Toccaceli D. (2013). I distretti in agricoltura: un’analisi comparata dell’approccio delle regioni italiane nella prospettiva della riforma delle politiche europee. In: Percorsi di governance per la valorizzazione delle aree rurali nella prospettiva di riforma delle politiche europee. “Quaderni dei Georgofili” Serie VIII - Vol. 10. Società Editrice Fiorentina. https://www.georgofili.net.
  51. Toccaceli D. (2015). Agricultural districts in the Italian regions: looking toward 2020. Agricultural and food economics, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-014-0019-9.
  52. Toccaceli D., Pacciani A. (2024). Dear old (and misunderstood) districts let’s look ahead. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA), 78(3): 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15062.
  53. Torfing J., Guy Peters B., Pierre J., Sørensen E. (2012). Interactive Governance: advancing the paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199596751.001.0001.
  54. Wegner D., Verschoore J. (2022). Network Governance in Action: Functions and Practices to Foster Collaborative Environments. Administration & Society, 54 (3): 479-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211024580.
  55. Yin R.K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  56. Zecca F., Am A., Capocchi E. (2015). Dai distretti alle reti d’impresa: soluzioni chiave per lo sviluppo territoriale. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics. 69(2-3): 227-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-16924.