2026: Special Issue. Urban and Territorial Resilience. Urbanism Facing Crisis
Special Issue. Urban and Territorial Resilience. Urbanism Facing Crisis

Living with Water: Toward an amphibious planning paradigm for multi-risk territories

Published 2026-01-29

Keywords

  • multi-risk climate adaptation,
  • perception mapping,
  • adaptive scenarios

How to Cite

De Martino, P., Ferraioli, E., Maragno, D., & Musco, F. (2026). Living with Water: Toward an amphibious planning paradigm for multi-risk territories. Contesti. Città, Territori, Progetti, 156–179. https://doi.org/10.36253/contest-16564

Abstract

Historically, climate adaptation responses have focused on large-scale mitigation strategies, often overlooking local needs, knowledge, and perceptions. Traditional planning—rooted in land-based logics and constrained by rigid borders—struggles to address the complexity of risks that are deeply interwoven with water. In Italy, a multi-risk landscape where land and sea interact constantly, challenges such as unsustainable growth often take the form of overbuilt, impermeable coastal zones that disrupt natural water cycles; social inequalities are evident in unequal access to safe, resilient public spaces along bodies of water; and intensifying environmental risks—from coastal erosion to flooding—are symptoms of failing to engage with water’s dynamic character. Drawing on research from the PNRR-funded MIRACLE project, this contribution calls for adaptive, amphibious strategies that bring local knowledge to the forefront. We propose urban laboratories as platforms for resilience, structured around three steps: (1) multi-risk analysis, (2) participatory and perceptual mapping, and (3) scenario building. By embracing water’s fluidity and relational nature, these labs foster inclusive, context-specific adaptation planning for more just and water-sensitive urban futures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bailey-Charteris, B. (2024). The Hydrocene: Eco-Aesthetics in the Age of Water (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003397304
  2. Balica, S.F., Wright, N.G. & van der Meulen, F. A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Nat Hazards 64, 73–105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0234-1
  3. Barbier, E. B. (2015). Valuing the storm protection service of estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Ecosystem Services, 11, 32-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.06.010
  4. Baumeister, J. (2023). Developing Aquatic Urbanism: A Taxonomy for 35 Tactics. In J. Baumeister, I. C. Giurgiu, D. Linaraki, & D. A. Ottmann (Eds.), SeaCities: Aquatic Urbanism (pp. 1-10). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2481-3_1
  5. Belland, M., Kausan, B. Y., Kooy, M., & Zwarteveen, M. (2025). Seeing like a pond: Amphibious stories of coastal subsidence in Central Java. Geoforum, 161, 104248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104248
  6. Bello, R. (2016). Sea Level Rise: Evaluating adaptation strategies and options.
  7. Bianchi, S. (2023). Integrating resilience in the multi-hazard sustainable design of buildings. Disaster Prevention and Resilience, 2023(2), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.20517/dpr.2023.16
  8. Bongarts Lebbe, T., Rey-Valette, H., Chaumillon, É., Camus, G., Almar, R., Cazenave, A., Claudet, J., Rocle, N., Meur-Férec, C., Viard, F., Mercier, D., Dupuy, C., Ménard, F., Rossel, B. A., Mullineaux, L., Sicre, M.-A., Zivian, A., Gaill, F., & Euzen, A. (2021). Designing Coastal Adaptation Strategies to Tackle Sea Level Rise [Policy and Practice Reviews]. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.740602
  9. De Martino, P., Hanna, J., & Hein, C. (2023). Mediterranean Imaginaries. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes (CPCL), 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/v6-n1-2023
  10. De Martino, P., Hein, C., Harteveld, M., & Forgaci, C. (2023). Designing Public Spaces for Maritime Mindsets. Rotterdam as Case Study. PORTUSplus, 16. https://portusplus.org/index.php/pp/article/view/295
  11. Franco-Torres, M., Rogers, B. C., & Harder, R. (2020). Articulating the new urban water paradigm. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(23), 2777–2823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1803686
  12. Gallina, V., Torresan, S., Critto, A., Sperotto, A., Glade, T., & Marcomini, A. (2016). A review of multi-risk methodologies for natural hazards: Consequences and challenges for a climate change impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 168, 123-132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.011
  13. Gedan, K., Kirwan, M., Wolanski, E., Barbier, E., & Silliman, B. (2010). The Present and Future Role of Coastal Wetland Vegetation in Protecting Shorelines: Answering Recent Challenges to the Paradigm. Climatic Change, 106, 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-0003-7
  14. Gill, J., & Malamud, B. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 52, 680–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000445
  15. Gill, J.C., Duncan, M., Ciurean, R., Smale, L., Stuparu, D., Schlumberger, J, de Ruiter M.,
  16. Tiggeloven, T., Torresan, S., Gottardo, S., Mysiak, J., Harris, R., Petrescu, E. C., Girard, T., Khazai, B.,
  17. Claassen, J., Dai, R., Champion, A., Daloz, A. S., … Ward, P. 2022. MYRIAD-EU D1.2 Handbook of Multihazard, Multi-Risk Definitions and Concepts. H2020 MYRIAD-EU Project, grant agreement number
  18. , pp 75.
  19. Giosan, L., Syvitski, J., Constantinescu, S., & Day, J. (2014). Climate change: Protect the world's deltas. Nature, 516, 31-33. https://doi.org/10.1038/516031a
  20. Granceri Bradaschia, M., Magni, F., & Musco, F. (2024). Climate Change Adaptation, Flood Risk, and Beyond. State of Play in the Science-Policy-Action Nexus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65463-3
  21. Granceri Bradaschia, M., Magni, F., & Musco, F. (2024). Climate change adaptation, flood risk, and beyond: State of play in the science-policy-action nexus.
  22. Hein, C. (2020). Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage: Past, Present and Future. Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8
  23. Hein, C. (2021). Port City Porosity: Boundaries, Flows, and Territories. Urban Planning, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4663
  24. Helmreich, S. (2011). Nature/Culture/Seawater. American anthropologist, 113, 132-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01311.x
  25. Komendantova, N., Mrzyglocki, R., Mignan, A., Khazai, B., Wenzel, F., Patt, A., & Fleming, K. (2014). Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision-support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: Feedback from civil protection stakeholders. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.006
  26. Komendantova, N., Scolobig, A., Garcia, A., Monfort, D., & Fleming, K. (2016). Multi-risk approach and urban resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7, 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2015-0013
  27. Krause, F. (2017). Towards an Amphibious Anthropology of Delta Life [Article]. Human Ecology, 45(3), 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9902-9
  28. Krause, F. (2022). Rhythms of wet and dry: Temporalising the land-water nexus. Geoforum, 131, 252-259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.12.001
  29. Lawyer, C., An, L., & Goharian, E. (2023). A Review of Climate Adaptation Impacts and Strategies in Coastal Communities: From Agent-Based Modeling towards a System of Systems Approach. Water, 15, 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15142635
  30. Linton, J., & Budds, J. (2014). The Hydrosocial Cycle: Defining and Mobilizing a Relational-Dialectical Approach to Water. Geoforum, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008
  31. Marzi, S., Mysiak, J., Essenfelder, A. H., Pal, J. S., Vernaccini, L., Mistry, M. N., Alfieri, L., Poljansek, K., Marin-Ferrer, M., & Vousdoukas, M. (2021). Assessing future vulnerability and risk of humanitarian crises using climate change and population projections within the INFORM framework. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102393
  32. McArdle, R. (2023). Liquid urbanisms: Framing the intrinsic fluidity of the urban. Geo: Geography and Environment, 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.116
  33. Morita, A. (2016). Infrastructuring Amphibious Space: The Interplay of Aquatic and Terrestrial Infrastructures in the Chao Phraya Delta in Thailand. Science as Culture, 25(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1081502
  34. Neil Adger, W., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
  35. Neimanis, A. (2012). Hydrofeminism : or, on becoming a body of water. In C. N. Henriette Gunkel & S. Fanny (Eds.), Undutiful Daughters : New Directions in Feminist Thought and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-91713
  36. Nilubon, P., & Laeni, N. (2024). Re-thinking new possibilities for urban climate resilience planning in Bangkok: Introducing adaptation pathways through a multidisciplinary design workshop. Environmental Science & Policy, 154, 103711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103711
  37. Nilubon, P., Veerbeek, W., & Zevenbergen, C. (2016). Amphibious Architecture and Design: A Catalyst of Opportunistic Adaptation? – Case Study Bangkok. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 470-480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.063
  38. Olivadese, M., & Dindo, M. L. (2024). Water, Ecosystem Services, and Urban Green Spaces in the Anthropocene. Land, 13(11), 1948. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111948
  39. Pelling, M., & Blackburn, S. (2013). Megacities and the Coast: Risk, Resilience and Transformation.
  40. Peters, K., & Steinberg, P. (2019). The ocean in excess: Towards a more-than-wet ontology. Dialogues in Human Geography, 9(3), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619872886
  41. Poljansek, K. Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer, M., Artes Vivancos, T., Boca, R., Bonadonna, C., Branco, A., Campanharo, W., De Jager, A., De Rigo, D., Dottori, F., Durrant, T., Estreguil, C., Ferrari, D., Frischknecht, C., Galbusera, L., Garcia Puerta, B., Giannopoulos, G., Girgin, S., Gowland, R., Grecchi, R., Hernandez Ceballos, M.A., Iurlaro, G., Kampourakis, G., Karlos, V., Krausmann, E., Larcher, M., Lequarre, A.S., Liberta`, G., Loughlin, S.C., Maianti, P., Mangione, D., Marques, A., Menoni, S., Montero Prieto, M., Naumann, G., Necci, A., Jacome Felix Oom, D., Pfieffer, H., Robuchon, M., Salamon, P., Sangiorgi, M., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Raposo De M. Do N. E S. De Sotto Mayor, M.L., Theocharidou, M., Theodoridis, G., Trueba Alonso, C., Tsionis, G., Vogt, J. and Wood, M., Recommendations for National Risk Assessment for Disaster Risk Management in EU, EUR 30596 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2021, ISBN 978-92-76-30256-8, doi:10.2760/80545, JRC123585.
  42. Radhakrishnan, M., Pathirana, A., Ashley, R. M., Gersonius, B., & Zevenbergen, C. (2018). Flexible adaptation planning for water sensitive cities. Cities, 78, 87-95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.022
  43. Ran, J., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2016). Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 57, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.01.008
  44. Roca, M., & Salazar, J. F. (2022). A Glossary of Water. Biennale of Sydney. https://www.biennaleofsydney.art/participants/a-glossary-of-water/
  45. Setiadi, R., Baumeister, J., & Lo, A. (2023). Floating Jakarta: A Human Dimension. In J. Baumeister, I. C. Giurgiu, D. Linaraki, & D. A. Ottmann (Eds.), SeaCities: Aquatic Urbanism (pp. 139-162). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2481-3_6
  46. Siegel, L. (2019). Bodies of water: posthuman feminist phenomenology. A. Neimanis (2017). Bodies of Water: Posthuman Feminist Phenomenology. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 35, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2019.2
  47. Silva, R., Zwarteveen, M., Stead, D., & Kuzniecow Bacchin, T. (2023). Bringing Ecological Urbanism and Urban Political Ecology to Transformative Visions of Water Sensitivity in Cities. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4393997
  48. Sohn, J., Vega, G. C., & Birkved, M. (2018). A Methodology Concept for Territorial Metabolism – Life Cycle Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities in Scaling from Urban to Territorial Assessment. Procedia CIRP, 69, 89-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.10.005
  49. Sperotto, A., Torresan, S., Gallina, V., Coppola, E., Critto, A., & Marcomini, A. (2016). A multi-disciplinary approach to evaluate pluvial floods risk under changing climate: The case study of the municipality of Venice (Italy). Science of The Total Environment, 562, 1031-1043. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.150
  50. Steinberg, P., & Peters, K. (2015). Wet Ontologies, Fluid Spaces: Giving Depth to Volume through Oceanic Thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1068/d14148p
  51. van Leeuwen, K., Hofman, J., Driessen, P. P. J., & Frijns, J. (2019). The Challenges of Water Management and Governance in Cities. Water, 11(6), 1180. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061180
  52. Viganò, P. (2010). Territorio dell'urbanistica. Il progetto come produttore di conoscenza. Officina.
  53. Viganò, P. (2012). Extreme Cities and Bad Places. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-012-0002-6
  54. Viganò, P., Secchi, B., (2009). Antwerp, Territory of a new modernity. Sun Publishers.