Just Accepted Manuscripts
Research Articles

Biodistricts as institutional innovations fostering agroecology transitions: the case of Chianti (Tuscany, Italy)

Just Accepted
  • Oriana Gava,
  • Francesco Vanni
Oriana Gava
CREA - Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Firenze, Italy
Francesco Vanni
CREA - Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Firenze, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16936

Published 2026-05-21

Keywords

  • socio-ecological system,
  • agroecology,
  • institutional innovation,
  • Biodistricts,
  • territorial governance

How to Cite

Gava, O., & Vanni, F. (2026). Biodistricts as institutional innovations fostering agroecology transitions: the case of Chianti (Tuscany, Italy). Italian Review of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16936

Copyright (c) 2026 Oriana Gava, Francesco Vanni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Funding data

Abstract

Agroecology transitions require institutional innovations that can reshape governance arrangements and actor coalitions to deliver positive socio‑ecological feedback. It is still unclear how such transformations can take root in highly specialised European agrifood systems, where market concentration and path dependency constrain change. Biodistricts are examples of territorial initiatives that integrate organic farming with participatory governance. Although they have gained prominence, there is insufficient understanding of their underlying socio‑ecological mechanisms. This study provides evidence from the Chianti Biodistrict (Tuscany, Italy), a bottom‑up governance innovation that has emerged within a specialised, export‑oriented viticultural landscape. Ostrom’s socio‑ecological systems framework is applied to the case study through qualitative empirical methods, within the frame of a 4-year participatory research project. The analysis aims to show how multi‑actor coalitions configure deliberation spaces; co‑design strategies; and foster the adoption of practices such as interrow cover, composting hubs, and collective pest monitoring. The findings highlight four mechanisms that enable systemic redesign: coalition mobilisation; reconfiguration of the linkages among resource systems, resource units, actors, and governance system; ecological-institutional feedback loops; and the mitigation of structural lock‑ins through coordination and stronger knowledge systems. These findings advance understanding of biodistricts as institutional innovations and show the value of the socio‑ecological systems framework as both an analytical lens and a boundary object for participatory territorial governance research. Theoretical grounding and anchoring to theoretical propositions support analytical generalisation and clarify conditions for transferability to other likewise (European) agroecology initiatives.

Just Accepted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aguilera E., Díaz-Gaona C., García-Laureano R., Reyes-Palomo C., Guzmán G.I., Ortolani L., Sánchez-Rodríguez M., Rodríguez-Estévez V. (2020). Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. A review. Agricultural Systems, 181, 102809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102809.
  2. Alarcon M., Marty P., Prévot A.C. (2020). Caring for vineyards: transforming farmer–vine relations and practices in viticulture French farms. Journal of Rural Studies, 80: 160-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.029.
  3. Amblard L. (2019). Collective action for water quality management in agriculture: the case of drinking water source protection in France. Global Environmental Change, 58, 101970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101970.
  4. Angeon V., Casagrande M., Navarrete M., Sabatier R. (2024). A conceptual framework linking ecosystem services, socio-ecological systems and socio-technical systems to understand the relational and spatial dynamics of the reduction of pesticide use in agrifood systems. Agricultural Systems, 213, 103810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103810.
  5. Assiri M., Barone V., Silvestri F., Tassinari M. (2021). Planning sustainable development of local productive systems: a methodological approach for the analytical identification of ecoregions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125006.
  6. Basurto X., Gelcich S., Ostrom E. (2013). The social–ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries. Global Environmental Change, 23(6): 1366-1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.001.
  7. Bellon S., Ollivier G. (2018). Institutionalizing agroecology in France: social circulation changes the meaning of an idea. Sustainability, 10(5), 1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051380.
  8. Bennett D.E., Gosnell H. (2015). Integrating multiple perspectives on payments for ecosystem services through a social–ecological systems framework. Ecological Economics, 116: 172-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.019.
  9. Biodistretto del Chianti (2022). Distretto Biologico del Chianti, Biodistretto del Chianti, Chianti. https://www.biodistrettodelchianti.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/DistrettoBiologicoChianti_13122022.pdf
  10. Blanco E. (2011). A social-ecological approach to voluntary environmental initiatives: the case of nature-based tourism. Policy Sciences, 44(1): 35-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-010-9121-3.
  11. Blesh J., Mehrabi Z., Wittman H., James D., Madsen S., Smith O.M., Snapp S., Stratton A.E., Bakarr M., Bicksler A.J., Galt R., Garibaldi L.A., Gemmill-Herren B., Grass I., Isaac M.E., John I., Jones S.K., Kennedy C.M., Kremen C. (2023). Against the odds: network and institutional pathways enabling agricultural diversification. One Earth, 6(5): 479-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.03.004.
  12. Brunori G., Rossi A. (2007). Differentiating countryside: social representations and governance patterns in rural areas with high social density: the case of Chianti, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(2): 183-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.001.
  13. Campbell B.M., Beare D.J., Bennett E.M., Hall-Spencer J.M., Ingram J.S.I., Jaramillo F., Ortiz R., Ramankutty N., Sayer J.A., Shindell D. (2017). Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecology and Society, 22(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09595-220408.
  14. Conway T.M. (2023). An agroecological turn in intermediating sustainability transitions with continuous living cover. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1009195.
  15. Cruz J.L., Hewitt R.J., Hernández-Jiménez V. (2023). Can public food procurement drive agroecological transitions? Pathways and barriers to sustainable food procurement in higher education institutions in Spain. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 47(10): 1488-1511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2248917.
  16. Dara Guccione G., Vigano L., Sturla A., Vaccaro A., Colombo L., Pirelli T., Varia F. (2024). Insights into the agroecological transition: the case of two Italian bio-districts. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 79(1): 97-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14241.
  17. Dax T., Schroll K., Machold I., Derszniak-Noirjean M., Schuh B., Gaupp-Berghausen M. (2021). Land abandonment in mountain areas of the EU: an inevitable side effect of farming modernization and neglected threat to sustainable land use. Land, 10(6), 591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060591.
  18. Debolini M., Marraccini E., Dubeuf J.P., Geijzendorffer I.R., Guerra C., Simon M., Targetti S., Napoléone C. (2018). Land and farming system dynamics and their drivers in the Mediterranean Basin. Land Use Policy, 75: 702-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.010.
  19. Dias R.S., Costa D.V.T.A., Correia H.E., Costa C.A. (2021). Building bio-districts or eco-regions: participative processes supported by focal groups. Agriculture, 11(6): 511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11060511.
  20. Doblas-Miranda E., Alonso R., Arnan X., Bermejo V., Brotons L., de las Heras. J, Estiarte M., Hódar J.A., Llorens P., Lloret F., López-Serrano F.R., Martínez-Vilalta J., Moya D., Peñuelas J., Pino J., Rodrigo A., Roura-Pascual N., Valladares F., Vilà M., Retana J. (2017). A review of the combination among global change factors in forests, shrublands and pastures of the Mediterranean region: beyond drought effects. Global and Planetary Change, 148: 42-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.11.012.
  21. Dumont A.M., Wartenberg A.C., Baret P.V. (2021). Bridging the gap between the agroecological ideal and its implementation into practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41(3): 32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00666-3.
  22. Eelderink M., Vervoort J., van Laerhoven F. (2020). Using participatory action research to operationalize critical systems thinking in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 25(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11369-250116.
  23. El Bilali H. (2019). Research on agro-food sustainability transitions: a systematic review of research themes and an analysis of research gaps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221: 353-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.232.
  24. Ewert F., Baatz R., Finger R. (2023). Agroecology for a Sustainable Agriculture and Food System: From Local Solutions to Large-Scale Adoption. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 15(15): 351-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-102422-090105.
  25. FAO (2017). The experience of bio-districts in Italy, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/agroecology/database/detail/en/c/1027958/.
  26. FAO (2018). The 10 elements of agroecology: guiding the transition to sustainable food and agricultural systems, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/i9037en/I9037EN.pdf.
  27. Fiore V., Borrello M., Carlucci D., Giannoccaro G., Russo S., Stempfle S., Roselli L. (2024). The socio-economic issues of agroecology: a scoping review. Agricultural and Food Economics, 12(1): 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-024-00311-z.
  28. Gaba S., Bretagnolle V. (2020). Social–ecological experiments to foster agroecological transition. People and Nature, 2(2): 317-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10078.
  29. Galioto F., Gava O., Povellato A., Vanni F. (2021). Innovative market and policy instruments to promote the agro-ecological transition strategies, UNISECO Deliverable 5.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5578065.
  30. Gava O., Vanni F., Schwarz G., Guisepelli E., Vincent A., Prazan J., Weisshaidinger R., Frick R., Hrabalová A., Carolus J., Yoldi U.I., Pyysiäinen J., Smyrniotopoulou A., Vlahos G., Balázs K., Szilágyi A.J., Jegelevičius G., Mikšytė E., Zilans A., Povellato A. (2025). Governance networks for agroecology transitions in rural Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 114, 103482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103482.
  31. Gliessman S.R. (2020). Transforming food and agriculture systems with agroecology. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(3): 547-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10058-0.
  32. Goodrich K.A., Sjostrom K.D., Vaughan C., Bednarek A., Lemos M.C. (2020). Who are boundary spanners and how can we support them in making knowledge more actionable in sustainability fields? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42: 45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.001.
  33. Guareschi M., Maccari M., Sciurano J.P., Arfini F., Pronti A. (2020). A methodological approach to upscale toward an agroecology system in EU-LAFSs: the case of the Parma bio-district. Sustainability, 12(13), 5398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135398.
  34. Guisepelli E., Fleury P., Vincent A., Aalders I., Prazan J., Vanni F. (2018). Adapted SES framework for AEFS and guidelines for assessing sustainability of agricultural systems in Europe, UNISECO Deliverable D2.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4568477.
  35. Gutiérrez Cano L.F., Zartha Sossa J.W., Orozco Mendoza G.L., Suárez Guzmán L.M., Agudelo Tapasco D.A., Quintero Saavedra J.I. (2023). Agricultural innovation system: analysis from the subsystems of R&D, training, extension, and sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1176366.
  36. Helenius J., Hagolani-Albov S.E., Koppelmäki K. (2020). Co-creating agroecological symbioses (AES) for sustainable food system networks. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.588715.
  37. Hertz T., Schlüter M. (2015). The SES-framework as boundary object to address theory orientation in social–ecological system research: the SES-TheOr approach. Ecological Economics, 116: 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.022.
  38. Hinkel J., Cox M., Schlüter M., Binder C., Falk T. (2015). A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases. Ecology and Society, 20(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07023-200132.
  39. Hoegh-Guldberg O., Jacob D., Taylor M., Bindi M., Brown S., Camilloni I., Diedhiou A., Djalante R., Ebi K.L., Engelbrecht F., Guiot J., Hijioka Y., Mehrotra S., Payne A., Seneviratne S.I., Thomas A., Warren R., Zhou G. (2018). Impacts of 1.5°C global warming on natural and human systems. In Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pörtner H.O., Roberts D., Skea J., Shukla P.R., Pirani A., Moufouma-Okia W., Péan C., Pidcock R., Connors S., Matthews J.B.R., Chen Y., Zhou X., Gomis M.I., Lonnoy E., Maycock T., Tignor M., Waterfield T. (eds.) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 175-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.005.
  40. Horlings L.G., Marsden T.K. (2011). Towards the real green revolution? exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could ‘feed the world’. Global Environmental Change, 21(2): 441-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.004.
  41. Ingram J. (2017). Perspective: look beyond production. Nature, 544(7651): S17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/544S17a.
  42. IN.N.E.R. (2021). Brochure INNER English, International Network of Eco Regions, Ceraso. https://www.ecoregion.info/research/.
  43. Jia X. (2021). Agro-food innovation and sustainability transition: a conceptual synthesis. Sustainability, 13(12), 6897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126897.
  44. Kelinsky-Jones L.R., Niewolny K.L., Stephenson M.O. (2023). Building agroecological traction: engaging discourse, the imaginary, and critical praxis for food system transformation. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1128430.
  45. Lachman D.A. (2013). A survey and review of approaches to study transitions. Energy Policy, 58: 269-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.013.
  46. Laforge J.M.L., Dale B., Levkoe C.Z., Ahmed F. (2021). The future of agroecology in Canada: embracing the politics of food sovereignty. Journal of Rural Studies, 81: 194-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.025.
  47. Lamine C., Pugliese P., Barataud F., Berti G., Rossi A. (2023). Italian biodistricts and French territorial food projects: How science-policy-experience interplays shape the framings of transitions towards sustainable territorial food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1223270.
  48. Landert J., Pfeifer C., Carolus J., Albanito F., Müller A., Baumgart L., Blockeel J., Schwarz G., Weisshaidinger R., Bartel-Kratochvil R., Hollaus A., Hrabalová A., Helin J., Aakkula J., Svels K., Guisepelli E., Fleury P., Vincent A., Smyrniotopoulou A., Vlahos G., Iordanidis Y., Szilágyi A., Podmaniczky L., Balázs K., Galioto F., Longhitano D., Rossignolo L., Povellato A., Zīlāns A., Jegelevičius G., Frățilă M., Iragui Yoldi U., Astrain Massa C., Bienzobas Adrian J., Resare Sahlin KRöös E., Frick R., Bircher R., Aalders I., Irvine K., Kyle C., Miller D., Sanders J., Smith P. (2019). Report on Environmental, Economic and Social Performance of Current AEFS, and Comparison to Conventional Baseline, UNISECO Deliverable D3.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3625681.
  49. Landert J., Pfeifer C., Carolus J.F. (2020). Assessing agro-ecological practices using a combination of three sustainability assessment tools. Landbauforschung: Journal of Sustainable and Organic Agricultural Systems, 70(2): 129-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3220/LBF1612794225000.
  50. Loconto A., Poisot A.S., Santacoloma P. (2017). Sustainable practices, sustainable markets? Institutional innovations in agri-food system. In Elzen B., Augustyn A.M., Barbier M., van Mierlo B. (eds.) AgroEcological Transitions: Changes and Breakthroughs in the Making, p.176-191. Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/407609.
  51. Long T.B., Blok V., Coninx I. (2016). Barriers to the adoption and diffusion of technological innovations for climate-smart agriculture in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands, France, Switzerland and Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.044.
  52. Loorbach D., Frantzeskaki N., Avelino F. (2017). Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1): 599-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
  53. Madureira L., Torre A. (2019). Innovation processes in rural areas. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11(2): 213-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12215.
  54. Marshall G.R. (2015). A social-ecological systems framework for food systems research: Accommodating transformation systems and their products. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2): 881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.587.
  55. McDermott R. (2023). On the scientific study of small samples: Challenges confronting quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(3), 101675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101675.
  56. McGinnis M.D., Ostrom E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2): art30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230.
  57. Méndez V.E., Bacon C.M., Cohen R., Gliessman S.R. (eds) (2016). Agroecology: A Transdisciplinary, Participatory and Action-Oriented Approach. CRC Press, Baco Raton, FL.
  58. Montenegro de Wit M. (2022). Can agroecology and CRISPR mix? The politics of complementarity and moving toward technology sovereignty. Agriculture and Human Values, 39(2): 733-755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10284-0.
  59. Mrabet R., Savé R., Toreti A., Caiola N., Chentouf M., Llasat M.C., Mohamed A.A.A., Santeramo F.G., Sanz-Cobena A., Tsikliras A. (2020). Food. In Cramer W., Guiot J., Marini K. (eds) Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future. First Mediterranean Assessment Report (pp. 237-264). Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, Marseille, France. ISBN 978-2-9577416-0-1.
  60. Ollivier G., Magda D., Mazé A., Plumecocq G., Lamine C. (2018). Agroecological transitions: What can sustainability transition frameworks teach us? An ontological and empirical analysis. Ecology and Society, 23(2): art5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09952-230205.
  61. Ostrom E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939): 419-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
  62. Ostrom E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1): 7-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.
  63. Padró R., Tello E., Marco I., Olarieta J.R., Grasa M.M., Font C. (2020). Modelling the scaling up of sustainable farming into agroecology territories: potentials and bottlenecks at the landscape level in a Mediterranean case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 124043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124043.
  64. Partelow S. (2018). A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecology and Society, 23(4): art36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10594-230436.
  65. Patel V., Biggs E., Pauli N., Boruff B. (2020). Using a social-ecological system approach to enhance understanding of structural interconnectivities within the beekeeping industry for sustainable decision making. Ecology and Society, 25(2): art24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11639-250224.
  66. Pimbert M.P. (2025). Financing agroecological transformations for territorial agri-food systems: Beyond the myth of financial scarcity. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 13(1), 00026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2025.00026.
  67. Pomponi T., Carillo F., Henke R., Sturla A., Del Giudice T., Sorrentino A. (2026). Biodistricts as social innovation: territorial implications in Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 121, 103926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103926.
  68. Poponi S., Arcese G., Mosconi E.M., Pacchera F., Martucci O., Elmo G.C. (2021). Multi-actor governance for a circular economy in the agri-food sector: Bio-districts. Sustainability, 13(9), 4718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094718.
  69. Prost L., Martin G., Ballot R., Benoit M., Bergez J.E., Bockstaller C., Cerf M., Deytieux V., Hossard L., Jeuffroy M.H., Leclère M., Le Bail M., Le Gal P.Y., Loyce C., Merot A., Meynard J.M., Mignolet C., Munier-Jolain N., Novak S., Parnaudeau V., Poux X., Sabatier R., Salembier C., Scopel E., Simon S., Tchamitchian M., Toffolini Q., van der Werf H. (2023). Key research challenges to supporting farm transitions to agroecology in advanced economies. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(1): 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00855-8.
  70. Rega C., Thompson B., Niedermayr A., Desjeux Y., Kantelhardt J., D’Alberto R., Gouta P., Konstantidelli V., Schaller L., Latruffe L., Paracchini M.L. (2022). Uptake of ecological farming practices by EU farms: a pan-European typology. EuroChoices, 21(3): 64-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12368.
  71. Regione Toscana (2015). PIT - Piano di indirizzo territoriale con valenza di piano paesaggistico - Scheda ambito di paesaggio - Ambito 10: Chianti. Regione Toscana, Florence. https://www.regione.toscana.it/documents/10180/12604324/10_Chianti.pdf/d1bd9db6-c777-4627-8dc8-42b93ad193b8.
  72. Ruggieri F., Coulon-Leroy C., Mazé A. (2023). How can collective action support the agroecological transition in geographical indication vineyards? Insights from the Loire Valley wine area. Sustainability, 15(12), 9371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129371.
  73. Ruggieri F., Mazé A., Coulon-Leroy C. (2025). A social–ecological approach to analyse systemic changes toward agroecological practices in vineyards under geographical indications: a case study of ground cover management in the Anjou-Saumur wine area (France). OENO One, 59(4), 9295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2025.59.4.9295.
  74. Runhaar H. (2021). Four critical conditions for agroecological transitions in Europe. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 19(3-4): 227-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1906055.
  75. Sachet E., Mertz O., Le Coq J.F., Cruz-Garcia G.S., Francesconi W., Bonin M., Quintero M. (2021). Agroecological transitions: A systematic review of research approaches and prospects for participatory action methods. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.709401.
  76. Schermer M. (2006). Regional rural development: the formation of ecoregions in Austria. In Holt G.C., Reed M. (eds) Sociological Perspectives of Organic agriculture: From Pioneer to Policy (pp. 227-242). CABI Publishing, Wallingford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845930387.0227.
  77. Schiller K., Godek W., Klerkx L., Poortvliet P.M. (2020). Nicaragua’s agroecological transition: Transformation or reconfiguration of the agri-food regime? Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 44(5): 611-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1667939.
  78. Schneider F., Feurer M., Lundsgaard-Hansen L.M., Nydegger K., Oberlack C., Zähringer J.G., Messerli P. (2020). Sustainable development under competing claims on land: three pathways between land-use changes, ecosystem services and human well-being. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(2): 316-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00268-x.
  79. Schoonhoven Y., Runhaar H. (2018). Conditions for the adoption of agro-ecological farming practices: a holistic framework illustrated with the case of almond farming in Andalusia. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(6): 442-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1537664.
  80. Schut M., Klerkx L., Sartas M., Lamers D., Campbell M.M., Ogbonna I., Kaushik P., Atta-Krah K., Leeuwis C. (2016). Innovation platforms: experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Experimental Agriculture, 52(4): 537-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971500023X.
  81. Schwarz G., Prazan J., Landert J., Miller D., Vanni F., Carolus J., Weisshaidinger R., Bartel-Kratochvil R., Mayer A., Frick R., Hrabalová A., Linares Quero A., Iragui U., Astrain Massa C., Helin J., Huismann D., Guisepelli E., Fleury P., Vincent A., Smyrniotopoulou A., Vlahos G., Balázs K., Szilágyi A., Podmaniczky L., Gava O., Povellato A., Galioto F., Zīlāns A., Veidemane K., Gulbinas J., Jegelevičius G., Myškyté E., Frățilă M., Cazacu M., Resare Sahlin K., Röös E., Pia C., Kyle C., Irvine K., Albanito F., Smith P. (2021a). Report on key barriers of agro-ecological farming systems in Europe and co-constructed strategies, UNISECO Deliverable 3.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5549542.
  82. Schwarz G., Vanni F., Miller D. (2021b). The role of transdisciplinary research in the transformation of food systems. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9(1): 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00207-2.
  83. Schwarz G., Vanni F., Miller D., Helin J., Pražan J., Albanito F., Fratila M., Galioto F., Gava O., Irvine K., Landert J., Quero A.L., Mayer A., Monteleone D., Muller A., Röös E., Smyrniotopoulou A., Vincent A., Vlahos G., Zīlāns A. (2022). Exploring sustainability implications of transitions to agroecology: A transdisciplinary perspective. EuroChoices, 21(3): 37-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12377.
  84. Seghezzo L., Huaranca L.L., Vega M.L., Jeckeln G.V., Avalos M.A., Iribarnegaray M.A., Volante J.N., Serrano F.H.M., Mastrangelo M., Sun Z., Müller D. (2020). Sustainable farmers, deficient State? Self-reported agricultural sustainability in the Argentine Chaco region. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 18(6): 473-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1793645.
  85. Sherwood S., Van Bommel S., Paredes M. (2016). Self-organization and the bypass: Re-imagining institutions for more sustainable development in agriculture and food. Agriculture, 6(4), 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6040066.
  86. Simoncini R. (2011). Governance objectives and instruments, ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation: The Chianti case study. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1): 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0112-x.
  87. Sivini S., Vitale A. (2023). Multifunctional and agroecological agriculture as pathways of generational renewal in Italian rural areas. Sustainability, 15(7), 5990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075990.
  88. Stotten R., Bui S., Pugliese P., Schermer M., Lamine C. (2018). Organic values-based supply chains as a tool for territorial development: A comparative analysis of three European organic regions. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48416/IJSAF.V24I1.120.
  89. Sturla A (2021). Esperienze europee. In Approccio agroecologico e biodistretti. Analisi di due casi di studio. Rete Rurale Nazionale, Rete Rurale Nazionale e Ministero delle politiche agricole alimentari e forestali, Roma, Italy. ISBN 9788833851273.
  90. Suwannadi T., Dechruksa W., Panpakdee C. (2026). Quantifying the effects of pest pressure and peer networks on pesticide purchasing decisions among Thai farmers. Sustainable Futures, 11, 101731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101731.
  91. Teixeira H.M., Van den Berg L., Cardoso I.M., Vermue A.J., Bianchi F.J.J.A., Peña-Claros M., Tittonell P. (2018). Understanding Farm Diversity to Promote Agroecological Transitions. Sustainability, 10(12), Article 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124337.
  92. Teschner N., Orenstein D.E. (2021). A transdisciplinary study of agroecological niches: Understanding sustainability transitions in vineyards. Agriculture and Human Values, 39: 33-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10220-2.
  93. Tittonell P. (2014). Ecological intensification of agriculture—Sustainable by nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8: 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.006.
  94. Tittonell P., Piñeiro G., Garibaldi L.A., Dogliotti S., Olff H., Jobbagy E.G. (2020). Agroecology in large scale farming—a research agenda. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.584605.
  95. Vallejo-Rojas V., Ravera F., Rivera-Ferre M.G. (2016). Developing an integrated framework to assess agri-food systems and its application in the Ecuadorian Andes. Regional Environmental Change, 16(8): 2171-2185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0887-x.
  96. van der Ploeg J.D. (2021). The political economy of agroecology. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(2): 274-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1725489.
  97. Vanni F., Gava O., Povellato A., Guisepelli E., Fleury P., Vincent A., Prazan J., Schwarz G., Bartel-Kratochvil R., Hollaus A., Weisshaidinger R., Frick R., Hrabalová A., Carolus J., Iragui Yoldi U., Elía Hurtado S., Pyysiäinen J., Aakkula J., Helin J., Rikkonen P., Smyrniotopoulou A., Vlahos G., Balázs K., Szilágyi A., Jegelevičius G., Mikšytė E., Zilans A., Veidemane K., Frățilă M., Röös E., Resare Sahlin K., Miller D., Kyle C., Irvine K.N., Aalders I. (2019). Governance networks supporting agro-ecological farming systems, UNISECO Deliverable 5.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4568422.
  98. Vilas-Boas J., Klerkx L., Lie R. (2022). Connecting science, policy, and practice in agri-food system transformation: The role of boundary infrastructures in the evolution of Brazilian pig production. Journal of Rural Studies, 89: 171-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.025.
  99. Vizuete B., García-Llorente M., Pérez-Ramírez I., Oteros-Rozas E. (2025). Gender equity as a key element for agroecological transitions: Neo-rural women as managers of agroecological initiatives. People and Nature, 7(2): 449-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10761.
  100. Wezel A., Brives H., Casagrande M., Clément C., Dufour A., Vandenbroucke P. (2016). Agroecology territories: Places for sustainable agricultural and food systems and biodiversity conservation. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 40(2): 132-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1115799.
  101. Wezel A., Goris M., Bruil J., Félix G., Peeters A., Bàrberi P., Bellon S., Migliorini P. (2018). Challenges and action points to amplify agroecology in Europe. Sustainability, 10(5), 1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051598.
  102. Wezel A., Herren B.G., Kerr R.B., Barrios E., Gonçalves A.L.R., Sinclair F. (2020). Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 40(6): 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00646-z.
  103. Williams T.G., Bürgi M., Debonne N., Diogo V., Helfenstein J., Levers C., Mohr F., Stratton A.E., Verburg P.H. (2024). Mapping lock-ins and enabling environments for agri-food sustainability transitions in Europe. Sustainability Science, 19(4): 1221-1242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01480-y.
  104. Wohlfahrt J., Ferchaud F., Gabrielle B., Godard C., Kurek B., Loyce C., Therond O. (2019). Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale. A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232: 898-909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385.
  105. Zanasi C., Basile S., Paoletti F., Pugliese P., Rota C. (2020). Design of a monitoring tool for eco-regions. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.536392.
  106. Zawalińska K., Smyrniotopoulou A., Balazs K., Böhm M., Chitea M., Florian V., Fratila M., Gradziuk P., Henderson S., Irvine K., Konstantidelli V., Krupin V., Latruffe L., Mikšytė E., Miller D., Monteleone D., Polaschegg M., Schwarz G., Tzanopoulos J., Tzouramani I., Vlahos G., Wojciechowska A. (2022). Advancing the contributions of European stakeholders in farming systems to transitions to agroecology. EuroChoices, 21(3): 50-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12378.