Just Accepted Manuscripts
Research Articles

What is driving the performance of Italian wine cooperatives?

Just Accepted
  • Andrea Mattia Pacifico,
  • Massimiliano Calvia,
  • Giulio Malorgio
Andrea Mattia Pacifico
University of Bologna
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16585

Published 2025-12-17

Keywords

  • wine cooperatives,
  • economic performance,
  • profitability,
  • wine economics,
  • fixed effects

How to Cite

Pacifico, A. M., Calvia, M., & Malorgio, G. (2025). What is driving the performance of Italian wine cooperatives?. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16585

Copyright (c) 2025 Andrea Mattia Pacifico, Massimiliano Calvia, Giulio Malorgio

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Cooperatives have long been central to the European wine sector, yet comprehensive national‑level analyses of their performance determinants remain scarce. This study investigates the financial and economic drivers of Italian wine cooperative performance using a fixed‑effects panel framework on an unbalanced sample of 452 entities over the 2021-2023 period. The analysis tests the effects of cooperative size (total assets, turnover), internal financing capacity (cash flow), capital structure (financial autonomy, debt‑to-equity ratio), and liquidity ratios (current, quick) on both earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA) and return on sales (ROS). The findings indicate that the cooperative size significantly influences performance. Estimates for cash flow and financial autonomy indicate that the internal financing capacity is a key driver of cooperative performance. The results underscore the relevance of governance and managerial structures in optimising resource allocation and liquidity management to harness cooperative principles without compromising competitiveness. Overall, this study provides actionable insights for policymakers and cooperative boards aiming to foster sustainable growth in the evolving wine market.

Just Accepted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Agbo M., Rousselière D., Salanié J. (2015). Agricultural marketing cooperatives with direct selling: a cooperative–non-cooperative game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 109: 56-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.11.003.
  2. Albanese M., Navarra C., Tortia E.C. (2015). Employer moral hazard and wage rigidity. The case of worker owned and investor owned firms. International Review of Law and Economics, 43: 227-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.08.006.
  3. Alchian A.A., Demsetz H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5): 777-795. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1815199.
  4. Alpeza I., Nižić I., Lukač Z. (2024). The Croatian consumer responses to the European GIs scheme of wine labeling. New Medit, 2: 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2402c.
  5. Arcas N., García D., Guzmán I. (2011). Effect of size on performance of Spanish agricultural cooperatives. Outlook on Agriculture, 40(3): 201-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2011.0051.
  6. Behmiri N.B., Correia L., Gouveia S. (2019). Drivers of wine production in the European Union: a macroeconomic perspective. New Medit, 3: 85-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30682/nm1903g.
  7. Ben-Ner A. (1987). Producer cooperatives: Why do they exist in capitalist economies? In Powell W.W., Bromley P. (eds) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook (pp. 434-449). Yale University Press, New Haven, USA.
  8. Borsellino V., Galati A., Ilardi C., Theofanous G., Schimmenti E. (2024). Wine industry resilience and strategy under crisis: the case of Sicilian cooperatives. In Galati A., Fiore M., Thrassou A., Vrontis D. (eds) Agribusiness Innovation and Contextual Evolution (pp. 249-271). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45738-8_11.
  9. Borsellino V., Varia F., Zinnanti C., Schimmenti E. (2020). The Sicilian cooperative system of wine production: the strategic choices and performance analyses of a case study. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 32(3): 391-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-10-2018-0062.
  10. Bureau Van Dijk (2025). Analisi informatizzata delle aziende italiane. https://aida.bvdinfo.com/version202255/home.serv?product=AidaNeo.
  11. Caracciolo F., Vita G.D., Lanfranchi M., D’Amico M. (2015). Determinants of Sicilian wine consumption: evidence from a binary response model. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 12(11): 794-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2015.794.801.
  12. Challita S., Aurier P., Sentis P. (2019). Linking branding strategy to ownership structure, financial performance and stability: case of French wine cooperatives. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 36(3): 292-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2019.097732.
  13. Coase R.H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica New Series, 4: 386-405.
  14. Coelho A. (2024). The leading wine cooperatives in Argentina and Europe: what are the strategic choices to penetrate the distribution channels in the United States and Canada? Sustainability, 16(15): 6376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156376.
  15. Couderc J., Marchini A. (2011). Governance, commercial strategies and performances of wine cooperatives. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23(3): 235-257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17511061111163069.
  16. D’Amato A., Festa G., Dhir A., Rossi M. (2021). Cooperatives’ performance relative to investor-owned firms: a non-distorted approach for the wine sector. British Food Journal, 124(13): 35-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0275.
  17. Ehiedu V.C. (2014). The impact of liquidity on profitability of some selected companies: the financial statement analysis (FSA) approach. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(5): 81-90.
  18. Fanasch P., Frick B. (2018). What makes cooperatives successful? Identifying the determinants of their organizational performance. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3): 282-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2018.28.
  19. Ferrer J.-R., Abella-Garcés, S. Maza M.-T. (2019). Spanish wine cooperatives’ business performance: innovation capabilities and miles and snow strategies. Journal of Wine Economics, 14(4): 409-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2019.36.
  20. Festa G., Rossi M., Kolte A., Situm M. (2020). Territory-based knowledge management in international marketing processes – the case of “Made in Italy” SMEs. European Business Review, 32(3): 425-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-06-2019-0129.
  21. Fragoso R., Vieira A. (2024). Exploring firm performance of the wine industry in Portugal using a two-stage efficiency analysis. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 126(3): 128-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7896/j.2838.
  22. Frick B. (2017). Some cooperatives produce great wines, but the majority does not: complementary institutional mechanisms to improve the performance of an indispensable organizational form. Journal of Wine Economics, 12(4): 386-394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2017.33.
  23. Gezahegn T.W., Van Passel S., Berhanu T., D’Haese M., Maertens M. (2019). Big is efficient: evidence from agricultural cooperatives in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 50(5): 555-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12509.
  24. Green J., Laffont J.-J. (1977). On the revelation of preferences for public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 8(1): 79-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(77)90030-5.
  25. Gujarati D. (2014). Econometrics by Example. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  26. Hansmann H. (1999). Cooperative firms in theory and practice. LTA, 48(4): 387-403.
  27. Hill R.C., Griffiths W.E., Lim G.C. (2018). Principles of Econometrics (3rd edition). John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.
  28. ISMEA (2024). L’italia del Vino. Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare, Roma Italia. https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/files/1/2/2/D.29f494c9784c9d69e239/SchedaVino_2024_Aprile_2024.pdf.
  29. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In Brunner K. (ed) Economics Social Institutions. Rochester Studies in Economics and Policy Issues (pp. 163-231). Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9257-3_8.
  30. Koç G., Cennet O. (2024). Cooperative branded food purchasing behaviour: understand the role of consumer social responsibility, trust, and agri-rural ties through theory of planned behaviour. New Medit, 4: 135-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30682/nm2404i.
  31. Liang Q., Bai R., Jin Z., Fu L. (2023). Big and strong or small and beautiful: effects of organization size on the performance of farmer cooperatives in China. Agribusiness, 39(1): 196-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21767.
  32. Licciardo F., Fontanari E. (2024). La cooperazione agricola italiana: Caratteristiche e rilevanza nel comparto agroalimentare, Rapporto di ricerca, Rete Rurale Nazionale, MASAF, Rome. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14161119.
  33. Magni C.A. (2021). Internal rates of return and shareholder value creation. The Engineering Economist, 66(4): 279-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1867679.
  34. Malorgio G., Grazia C., Caracciolo F., De Rosa C. (2013). Determinants of wine-bottling strategic decisions: empirical evidence from the Italian wine industry. In Giraud-Héraud E., Pichery M.-C. (eds) Wine Economics: Quantitative Studies and Empirical Applications (pp. 266-296). Palgrave Macmillan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137289520_14.
  35. Marques A., Teixeira C.A. (2023). Vine and wine sustainability in a cooperative ecosystem—a review. Agronomy, 13(10): 2644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102644.
  36. Martínez-Victoria Mc., Maté-Sanchez-Val M. (2021). Determinants of trade credit financing: a dynamic analysis comparing agri-food cooperatives and non-cooperatives. Agricultural Finance Review, 82(5): 890-913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-09-2021-0126.
  37. Mediobanca (2022). Il Settore Vinicolo in Italia (Ed. 2022), Area Studi Mediobanca, Milan.
  38. Mozas-Moral A., Fernández-Uclés D., Medina-Viruel M. J., Bernal-Jurado E. (2021). The role of the SDGs as enhancers of the performance of Spanish wine cooperatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173: 121176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121176.
  39. Neves E., Dias A., Ferreira M., Henriques C. (2022). Determinants of wine firms’ performance: the Iberian case using panel data. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 30(3): 325-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-10-2021-0203.
  40. Ortmann G.F., King R.P. (2007). Agricultural cooperatives II: can they facilitate access of small-scale farmers in South Africa to input and product markets? Agrekon, 46(2): 219-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2007.9523769.
  41. Pliakoura A.P., Beligiannis G., Kontogeorgos A. (2021). Significant barriers to the adoption of the agricultural cooperative model of entrepreneurship: a literature review. International Journal of Social Economics, 49(1): 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-10-2020-0710.
  42. Pokharel K.P., Regmi M., Featherstone A.M., Archer D.W. (2019). Examining the financial performance of agricultural cooperatives in the USA. Agricultural Finance Review, 79(2): 271-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-11-2017-0103.
  43. Pomarici E., Corsi A., Mazzarino S., Sardone R. (2021). The Italian wine sector: evolution, structure, competitiveness and future challenges of an enduring leader. Italian Economic Journal, 7(2): 259-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-021-00144-5.
  44. Prendergast C. (1999). The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1): 7-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.1.7.
  45. Rebelo J., Caldas J. (2015). The economic role of the Portuguese agricultural cooperatives. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 53: 91-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790053s01007.
  46. Richter B., Hanf J.H. (2021). Cooperatives in the wine industry: sustainable management practices and digitalisation. Sustainability, 13(10): 5543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105543.
  47. Royer J.S. (1999). Cooperative organizational strategies: a neo-institutional digest. Journal of Cooperatives, 14: 44-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.46367.
  48. Royer J.S. (2014). The neoclassical theory of cooperatives: part I. Journal of Cooperatives, 28: 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.244008.
  49. Sala-Ríos M. (2024). What are the determinants affecting cooperatives’ profitability? Evidence from Spain. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 95(1): 85-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12423.
  50. Schamel G. (2018). Guest editor’s introduction to the symposium: organization and performance of cooperative firms in the wine sector. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3): 260-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2018.33.
  51. Schamel G.H. (2014). Wine quality, reputation, denominations: how cooperatives and private wineries compete? BIO Web of Conferences, 3: 03008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20140303008.
  52. Staatz J.M. (1987). Farmers’ incentives to take collective action via cooperatives: a transaction cost approach. In Royer J.S. (eds) Cooperative Theory: New Approaches (pp. 87-107). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.
  53. Tessitore A. (1990). Imprenditorialità e cooperazione. Giuffré, Milan.
  54. Troiano S., Rizzi L., Marangon F. (2023). Social or environmental consciousness? Exploring the consumption of cooperative wines among European citizens. Wine Economics and Policy, 12(2): 69-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14241.
  55. Verbeek M. (2004). A guide to modern econometrics (2nd edition). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  56. Wooldridge J.M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (6th edition). Cengage Learning, Toronto.
  57. Yen M.-F., Li Y.-Y., Miranda M. (2025). Leverage, liquidity, and agricultural cooperative profitability. International Advances in Economic Research, 31(1): 45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-025-09930-8.