Vol. 80 No. 1 (2025)
Keynote Article

Transdisciplinary perspectives to investigate sustainable food system transitions

PDF
  • Stefano Pascucci
Stefano Pascucci
University of Exeter Business School, United Kingdom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16017

Published 2025-09-18

Keywords

  • transdiciplinarity,
  • sustainability,
  • food futures,
  • anthropocene,
  • socio-ecological transitions

How to Cite

Pascucci, S. (2025). Transdisciplinary perspectives to investigate sustainable food system transitions. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-16017

Copyright (c) 2025 Stefano Pascucci

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The Anthropocene is an unprecedented geological period characterised by large-scale socio-ecological crises, including biodiversity loss, climate change, ocean acidification and irreversible deterioration of soil health, among others. These crises have created concerns among scientists, who are now openly discussing scenarios in which humanity will not be able to inhabit this planet and challenging how they can respond to these mounting challenges. Given this dramatic and contested context, in this essay we pose the following questions: what are the fields of knowledge we need (to collectively create) to solve the crises of a planet in chaos? What (type of) knowledge do we need? From whom and for whom? We tackle these questions by looking at the opportunity to collectively develop transdisciplinary knowledge that would help investigate sustainability transitions as ways in which humanity can respond to the socio-ecological challenges of the Anthropocene and to design systemic change. Among these transitions, we focus on circular and regenerative principles and look at the case of protein transitions as well as agroecology and circular food systems. This informs our discussion on the emergence of transdisciplinary pathways in which agricultural economists can and should have a key role.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adler P.S. (2022). Capitalism, socialism, and the climate crisis. Organization Theory, 3(1), 26317877221084713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221084713.
  2. Aiking H., de Boer J. (2020). The next protein transition. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 105: 515-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.008.
  3. Alexander A., Pascucci S., Charnley F. (eds). (2023). Handbook of the circular economy: Transitions and transformation. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21637/GT.2024.1.08.
  4. Alvesson M., Gabriel Y., Paulsen R. (2017). Return to Meaning. A Social Science With Something to Say. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787099.001.0001.
  5. Ambikapathi R., Schneider K.R., Davis B., Herrero M., Winters P., Fanzo J.C. (2022). Global food systems transitions have enabled affordable diets but had less favourable outcomes for nutrition, environmental health, inclusion and equity. Nature Food, 3(9): 764-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00588-7.
  6. Banerjee S.B. (2003). Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development the reinvention of nature. Organization Studies, 24(1): 143-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024001341.
  7. Barrett C.B. (2021). Overcoming global food security challenges through science and solidarity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 103(2): 422-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12160.
  8. Biggart N.W. (2016). Biggart’s lament, or getting out of the theory cave. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 1381-1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12185.
  9. Borrello M., Pascucci S., Cembalo L. (2020). Three propositions to unify circular economy research: A review. Sustainability, 12(10), 4069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104069.
  10. Bowen F.E., Bansal P., Slawinski N. (2018). Scale matters: The scale of environmental issues in corporate collective actions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5): 1411-1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2764
  11. Cassman K.G., Grassini P. (2020). A global perspective on sustainable intensification research. Nature Sustainability, 3(4): 262-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0507-8
  12. Circle Economy (2016). The circular dairy economy. Available at: https://www.circle-economy.com/resources/the-circular-dairy-economy (last accessed 15/06/2025)
  13. Costanza R., Graumlich L.J., Steffen W. (2007). Sustainability or collapse. Ambio, 36(7): 522-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[522:SOCWCW]2.0.CO;2.
  14. De Cock C., Nyberg D., Wright C. (2021). Disrupting climate change futures: Conceptual tools for lost histories. Organization, 28(3): 468-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419883377.
  15. Dentoni D., Pinkse J., Lubberink R. (2021). Linking sustainable business models to socio-ecological resilience through cross-sector partnerships: A complex adaptive systems view. Business and Society, 60(5): 1216-1252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320935015.
  16. EMF (2023). Big Food Redesign Challenge: It’s time to redesign food. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/the-big-food-redesign-challenge/overview.
  17. Ergene S., Banerjee S.B., Hoffman A.J. (2021). (Un)sustainability organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42(8): 1319-1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620937892.
  18. Fresco L.O., Geerling-Eiff F., Hoes A.C., van Wassenaer L., Poppe K.J., van der Vorst J.G. (2021). Sustainable food systems: do agricultural economists have a role? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 48(4): 694-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbab026.
  19. Feuls M., Hernes T., Schultz M. (2025). Putting distant futures into action: How actors sustain a course of action toward distant-future goals through path enactment. Academy of Management Journal, 68(2), 297-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2022.0257.
  20. Garud R., Gehman J. (2012). Metatheoretical perspectives on sustainability journeys: Evolutionary, relational durational. Research Policy, 41(6): 980-995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009.
  21. Garud R., Kumaraswamy A., Karnøe P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4): 760-774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x.
  22. Geels F.W. (2018). Disruption and low-carbon system transformation: Progress and new challenges in socio-technical transitions research and the Multi-Level Perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 37: 224-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.010.
  23. George G., Howard-Grenville J., Joshi A., Tihanyi L. (2016). Understanding tackling societal gr challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6): 1880-1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4007.
  24. Gümüsay A.A., Marti E., Trittin-Ulbrich H., Wickert C. (2022). How organizing matters for societal gr challenges. In Gümüsay A.A., Marti E., Trittin-Ulbrich H., Wickert C. (eds) Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges (pp. 1-14). Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079002.
  25. Gümüsay A.A., Reinecke J. (2022). Researching for desirable futures: From real utopias to imagining alternatives. Journal of Management Studies, 59(1): 236-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12709.
  26. Gümüsay A.A., Reinecke J. (2024). Imagining desirable futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour. Organization Theory, 5(1), 26317877241235939. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877241235939.
  27. Gunderson L., Holling C.S. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human Natural Systems. Island Press, New York.
  28. Haas W., Krausmann F., Wiedenhofer D., Lauk C., Mayer A. (2020). Spaceship earth’s odyssey to a circular economy – A century long perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 163, 105076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105076.
  29. Kim A., Bansal P., Haugh H. (2019). No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2): 607-634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1295.
  30. Köhler J., Geels F.W., Kern F., Markard J., Onsongo E., Wieczorek A., Alkemade F., Avelino F., Bergek A., Boons F., Fünfschilling L., Hess D., Holtz G., Hyysalo S., Jenkins K., Kivimaa P., Martiskainen M., McMeekin A., Mühlemeier M.S., Nykvist B., Pel B., Raven R., Rohracher H., Sandén B., Schot J., Sovacool B., Turnheim B., Welch D., Wells P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art future directions. Environmental Innovation Societal Transitions, 31: 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
  31. Langley A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 691-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259349.
  32. Lobbedez E., Pascucci S., Panico T. (2025). Theorizing Waste as a Technique of Power in Capitalistic Stakeholder Relations. Journal of Management Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13190.
  33. Markard J., Raven R., Truffer B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6): 955-967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
  34. Mills J., Thurlow A., Mills A.J. (2010). Making sense of sensemaking: The critical sensemaking approach. Qualitative Research in Organizations Management, 5(2): 182-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011068857.
  35. Monbiot G. (2022). Regenesis: Feeding the World Without Devouring the Planet. Penguin, London.
  36. Pascucci S. (2020). Circular food economies. In Duncan J., Carolan M., Wiskerke J.S.C. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Regenerative Food Systems (pp. 318-335). Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466823.
  37. Pascucci S., Duncan J. (2017). From pirate islands to communities of hope. In Duncan J., Bailey M. (eds) Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisciplinary Solutions. Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315463131-14.
  38. Pascucci S., Dentoni D., Clements J., Poldner K., Gartner W.B. (2021). Forging forms of authority through the sociomateriality of food in partial organizations. Organization Studies, 42(2): 301-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620980232.
  39. Peeters A.L., Tromp N., Bulah B.M., van der Meer M., van den Boom L., Hekkert P.P. (2024). Framing for the protein transition: Eight pathways to foster plant-based diets through design. Environmental Innovation Societal Transitions, 52, 100848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100848.
  40. Radebaugh A. (1953). Closer than we think. Available at: https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/12/07/458164082/the-past-is-littered-with-foods-of-the-future (last accessed 14/06/2025).
  41. Reinecke J. (2018). Social movements and prefigurative organizing: Confronting entrenched inequalities in Occupy London. Organization Studies, 39(9): 1299-1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618759815.
  42. Reisman E., Fairbairn M. (2020). Agri-food systems and the Anthropocene. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(3): 687-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1828025.
  43. Rhodes C.J. (2012). Feeding healing the world: Through regenerative agriculture permaculture. Science Progress, 95(4): 345-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3184/003685012X13504990668392.
  44. Ritchie H., Roser M. (2024). Do we only have 60 harvests left? OurWorldInData.org. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/soil-lifespans.
  45. Rockström J., Gupta J., Qin D., Lade S.J., Abrams J.F., Anderersen L.S., Armstrong McKay D.I., Bai X., Bala G., Bunn S.E., Ciobanu D., DeClerck F., Ebi K., Gifford L., Gordon C., Hasan S., Kanie N., Lenton T.M., Loriani S., Liverman D.M., Mohamed A., Nakicenovic N., Obura D., Ospina D., Prodani K., Rammelt C., Sakschewski B., Scholtens J., Stewart-Koster B., Tharammal T., van Vuuren D., Verburg P.H., Winkelmann R., Zimm C., Bennett E.M., Bringezu S., Broadgate W., Green P.A., Huang L., Jacobson L., Ndehedehe C., Pedde S., Rocha J., Scheffer M., Schulte-Uebbing L., de Vries W., Xiao C., Xu C., Xu X., Zafra-Calvo N., Zhang X. (2023). Safe just Earth system boundaries. Nature, 619(7968): 102-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8.
  46. Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson Å., Chapin III F.S., Lambin, E., Lenton T.M., Scheffer M., Folke C., Schellnhuber H.J., Nykvist B., de Wit C.A., Hughes T., van der Leeuw S., Rodhe H., Sörlin S., Snyder P.K., Costanza R., Svedin U., Falkenmark M., Karlberg L., Corell R.W., Fabry V.J., Hansen J., Walker B., Liverman D., Richardson K., Crutzen P., Foley J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/26268316.
  47. Sharma G., Bansal T. (2020). Cocreating rigorous relevant knowledge. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2): 386-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0487.
  48. Steffen W., Rockström J., Richardson K., Lenton T.M., Folke C., Liverman D., Summerhayes C.P., Barnosky A.D., Cornell S.E., Crucifix M., Donges J.F., Fetzer I., Lade S.J., Scheffer M., Winkelmann R., Schellnhuber H.J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(33): 8252-8259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115.
  49. Slawinski N., Bansal P. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2): 531-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0960.
  50. Stock P.V., Carolan M., Rosin C. (2015). Food utopias: Hoping the future of agriculture. In Stock P.V., Carolan M., Rosin C. (eds) Food Utopias: Reimagining Citizenship, Ethics and Community (pp. 3-13). Routledge, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765532.
  51. Tittonell P. (2014). Ecological intensification of agriculture - Sustainable by nature. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8: 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.006.
  52. Tittonell P., El Mujtar V., Felix G., Kebede Y., Laborda L., Luján Soto R., de Vente J. (2022). Regenerative agriculture - Agroecology without politics? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 844261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.844261.
  53. Truffer B., Rohracher H., Kivimaa P., Raven R., Alkemade F., Carvalho L., Feola G. (2022). A perspective on the future of sustainability transitions research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42: 331-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.01.006.
  54. Tziva M., Negro S.O., Kalfagianni A., Hekkert M.P. (2020). Understanding the protein transition: The rise of plant-based meat substitutes. Environmental Innovation Societal Transitions, 35: 217-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.004.
  55. Webster K. (2013). What might we say about a circular economy? Some temptations to avoid if possible. World Futures, 69(7-8): 542-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2013.835977
  56. Webster K. (2021). A circular economy is about the economy. Circular Economy Sustainability, 1: 115-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-021-00034-z.
  57. Webster K., Pascucci S. (2024). From socio-technical innovations to ecological transitions: A multilevel perspective on circular economy. In Ometto A.R., Sarkis, J., Evans S. (eds) A Systemic Transition to Circular Economy: Business Technology Perspectives. Springer, Cham (pp. 111-134). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55036-2_6.
  58. Weituschat C.S., Pascucci S., Materia V.C., Tamas P., de Jong R., Trienekens J. (2022). Goal frames sustainability transitions: How cognitive lock-ins can impede crop diversification. Sustainability Science, 17(6): 2203-2219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01156-5.
  59. Whiteman G., Cooper W.H. (2011). Ecological sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5): 889-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.0843.
  60. Whiteman G., Walker B., Perego P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2): 307-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01073.x.
  61. Whiteman G., Williams A. (2018). Systemic planetary risks. The Routledge Companion to Risk, Crisis Emergency Management. Routledge, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315458175.
  62. Wickert C., Post C., Doh J.P., Prescott J.E., Prencipe A. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2): 297-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12666.
  63. Willett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., Garnett T., Tilman D., DeClerck F., Wood A., Jonell M., Clark M., Gordon L.J., Fanzo J., Hawkes C., Zurayk R., A Rivera J., De Vries W., Sibanda L.M., Afshin A., Chaudhary A., Herrero M., Agustina R., Branca F., Lartey A., Fan S., Crona B., Fox E., Bignet V., Troell M., Lindahl T., Singh S., Cornell S.E., Reddy K.S., Narain S., Nishtar S., Murray C.J.L. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170): 447-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.
  64. Williams A., Perego P., Whiteman G. (2025). Boundary conditions for organizations in the Anthropocene: A review of the planetary boundaries framework 10 years on. Journal of Management Studies, 62(4): 1811-1846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13150.
  65. Wright C., Nyberg D., De Cock C., Whiteman G. (2013). Future imaginings: Organizing in response to climate change. Organization, 20(5): 647-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413489821.