Just Accepted Manuscripts
Research Articles

Contested Ecological transitions in agri-food: emerging territorial systems in times of crisis and insecurity

Just Accepted
  • Terry Marsden
Terry Marsden
Cardiff University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15421

Published 2024-12-18

Keywords

  • Transition,
  • poly-crises,
  • land use practices,
  • sustainable and regenerative farming

How to Cite

Marsden, T. (2024). Contested Ecological transitions in agri-food: emerging territorial systems in times of crisis and insecurity. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA). https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15421

Copyright (c) 2024 Terry Marsden

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The paper will assess the extent to which sustainable transitions are occurring with reference to Europe in the 2020’s. Here, re-assessing the relationships between science, policy and politics is critical given the ‘polycrises’ which are impacting upon our food systems. Do these interlinked crises and disruptions suggest opportunities for sustainable and more territorial transitions in agri-food to gain traction and scale out? This is a possibility, but we have to critically assess the revised power configurations that are emerging in a more variegated and diverse agri-food policy and political landscape. Established theories of sustainable transitions need adjusting to take account of a changing science-policy-political landscape, and one which will have to integrate (rather than fragment) the new drivers of net- zero, necessary health and diet shifts, food poverty and security concerns, as well as sustainable and regenerative farming and land-use practices. This gives more opportunity, it will be argued, for integrated territorial management which encourages multi-stakeholder policies and politics. The routes to this are, based upon our recent empirical evidence far from linear; rather they are often inert rather than capable, competing rather than collaborative. As such we need to devise political and policy frameworks at devolved regional and territorial levels. The paper will explore examples of how and where this might be taking place, and what lessons can be learned for re-theorising agrarian transitions.

Just Accepted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Allaire G., Boyer R. (1995). La grande transformation de l’agriculture: Lectures conventionnalistes et régulationnistes. Quae.
  2. Allaire G., Wolf S. (2004). ‘Cognitive representation and institutional Hybridity in Agrofood Systems of Innovation’. Sciences Technology and Human Value, 29(4) 431-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904265896.
  3. Allen P., FitzSimmons M., Goodman M., Warner K. (2003). ‘Shifting plates in the agrifood landscape: the tectonics of alternative agrifood initiatives in California’. Journal of rural studies, 19(1): 61-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00047-5.
  4. Avelino F., Wittmayer J.M. (2016). ‘Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5): 628-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
  5. Barbier M., Elzen B. (2012). System Innovations, Knowledge Regimes, and Design Practices towards Transitions for Sustainable Agriculture. INRA. Paris.
  6. Belmin R., Casabianca F., Meynard J.-M. (2018). ‘Contribution of transition theory to the study of geographical indications’. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27: 32-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.002.
  7. Bui S. (2015). Pour une approche territoriale des transitions écologiques. Analyse de la transition vers l’agroécologie dans la Biovallée (1970-2015). Phd thesis. AgroParisTech. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02116016.
  8. Bui S., Cardona A., Lamine C., Cerf M. (2016). ‘Sustainability transitions: Insights on processes of niche-regime interaction and regime reconfiguration in agri-food systems’. Journal of Rural Studies, 48: 92-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.003.
  9. Bui S. (2021). ‘Enacting Transitions  The Combined Effect of Multiple Niches in Whole System Reconfiguration’. Sustainability, 13(11), 6135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116135.
  10. Callon M. (1986). ‘Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques dans la Baie de Saint-Brieuc’. L’Année Sociologique [Preprint], (36).
  11. Campbell H. (2005). ‘The rise and rise of EurepGAP: The European (re)invention of colonial food relations?’. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 13(2): 6-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v13i2.307.
  12. Campbell H. (2009). ‘Breaking new ground in food regime theory: corporate environmentalism, ecological feedbacks and the “food from somewhere” regime?’. Agriculture and Human Values, 26(4): 309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9215-8.
  13. Cefaï D. (1996). ‘La construction des problèmes publics. Définitions de situations dans des arènes publiques’. Réseaux, 14(75): 43-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/reso.1996.3684.
  14. Chateauraynaud F. (2011). Argumenter dans un champ de forces : Essai de balistique sociologique. Paris: Editions Pétra.
  15. Darnhofer I., D’Amico S., Fouilleux E. (2019). ‘A relational perspective on the dynamics of the organic sector in Austria, Italy, and France’. Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 200-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.002.
  16. Deverre C., Marie C. de S. (2008). ‘L’écologisation de la politique agricole européenne. Verdissement ou refondation des systèmes agro-alimentaires’. Revue d’Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, 89(4): 83-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/reae.2008.1956.
  17. Diaz M., Darnhofer I., Darrot C., Beuret J-B. (2013). ‘Green tides in Brittany: What can we learn about niche–regime interactions?’. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 8: 62-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.002.
  18. El Bilali H. (2019). ‘The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review’. Agriculture, 9(4): 74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9040074.
  19. European Commission (2020, 2022). Farm to Fork Strategy. EC, Brussels. Also related scientific reports SAPEA and SAM attached.
  20. Friedmann H., McMichael P. (1989). ‘Agriculture and the state system: the rise and fall of national agricultures, 1870 to the present’. Sociologia Ruralis, 29(2): 93-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x.
  21. Geels F.W. (2004). ‘From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory’. Research Policy, 33: 897-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
  22. Geels F.W. (2018). ‘Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990-2016)’. Energy Research & Social Science, 46: 86-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.008.
  23. Geels F.W. Schot J. (2007). ‘Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways’. Research Policy, 36th edn: 399-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
  24. Goodman D., DuPuis E.M., Goodman M.K. (2013). Alternative Food Networks: Knowledge, Practice, and Politics. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203804520.
  25. Haxeltine A., Pel B., Wittmayer J., Dumitru A., Kemp R., Avelino F. (2017). ‘Building a middle-range theory of Transformative Social Innovation; theoretical pitfalls and methodological responses’. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1): 59-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.5.
  26. Hervieu B. (2007). ‘Des agricultures à nommer’. Pour, 194(2): 49-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/pour.194.0049.
  27. IPES Food (2018). ‘Breaking away from industrial food and farming systems: Seven case studies of agroecological transition’. 110p.
  28. Jollivet M. (2007). ‘La grande transformation de l’agriculture française sous l’œil du sociologue’, Économie rurale. Agricultures, alimentations, territoires, (300): 26-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.2098.
  29. Klerkx L., Leeuwis C. (2008). ‘Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries’. Food Policy, 33(3): 260-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.001.
  30. Lamine C., Renting H., Rossi A., Wiskerke J.S.C. (Han), Brunori G. (2012). ‘Agri-Food systems and territorial development: innovations, new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms’. In: Darnhofer I., Gibbon D., Dedieu B. (eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands: 229-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_11.
  31. Lamine C. (2020). Sustainable Agri-food Systems: Case Studies in Transitions Towards Sustainability from France and Brazil. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  32. Lamine C., Magda D., Rivera-Ferre M., Marsden T. (eds.) (2021). Agroecological transitions, between determinist and open-ended visions. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/.
  33. Lamine C., Darnhofer I., Marsden T.K. (2019). What enables just sustainability transitions in agrifood systems? An exploration of conceptual approaches using international comparative case studies, Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 144-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.010.
  34. Lamine C., Garçon L., Brunori G. (2019). Territorial agrifood systems: A Franco-Italian contribution to the debates over alternative food networks in rural areas, Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 159-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.11.007.
  35. Lamine C., Marsden T.K (2023). Unfolding sustainability transitions in food systems: insights from UK and French trajectories. Proceedings of the American National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 120(47): 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206231120.
  36. Lawhon M., Murphy J.T. (2012). ‘Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology’. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3): 354-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511427960.
  37. Loconto A.M., Fouilleux E. (2019). ‘Defining agroecology: Exploring the circulation of knowledge in FAO’s Global Dialogue’. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 25(2): 116-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v25i2.27.
  38. Magrini M.-B., Anton M., Cholez C., Corre-Hellou G., Duc G., Jeuffroy M-H., Meynard J-M., Pelzer E., Voisin A-S., Walrand S. (2016). Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system. Ecological Economics, 126: 152-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.024.
  39. Marsden T. (2004). ‘The Quest for Ecological Modernisation: Re-Spacing Rural Development and Agri-Food Studies’. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(2): 129-146. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00267.x.
  40. Milone P., Ventura F., Ye J. (eds.) (2015). Constructing a new framework for rural development. Research in Rural Sociology and Development, Volume 22, Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1057-192220150000022015.
  41. Moragues-Faus A., Marsden T. (2017). ‘The political ecology of food: Carving “spaces of possibility” in a new research agenda’. Journal of Rural Studies, 55: 275-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.016.
  42. Morgan K., Marsden T., Murdoch J. (2008). Worlds of Food: Place, Power, and Provenance in the Food Chain. OUP Oxford.
  43. Muller P. (2000). ‘La politique agricole française: l’État et les organisations professionnelles’. Économie rurale, 255(1): 33-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.2000.5153.
  44. Murdoch J., Miele M. (1999). ‘Back to Nature, changing world of production’. Sociologia ruralis, 39(4): 465-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00119.
  45. Ploeg J.D. van der (2018). ‘From de-to repeasantization: The modernization of agriculture revisited’. Journal of Rural Studies, 61: 236-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.12.016.
  46. Rossi A., Bocci R. (2018). ‘The transformative potential of social innovation. The case of wheat and bread value chain in Tuscany’. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 24(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v24i3.5.
  47. Rossi A., Bui S., Marsden T. (2019). ‘Redefining power relations in agrifood systems’. Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 147-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.002.
  48. Smith A. (2006). ‘Green Niches in Sustainable Development: The Case of Organic Food in the United Kingdom’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(3): 439-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c0514j.
  49. Smith A., Seyfang G. (2013). ‘Constructing grassroots innovations for sustainability’. Global Environmental Change, 23(5): 827-829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.003.
  50. Spaargaren G., Oosterveer P., Loeber A. (2013). Food practices in transition: changing food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity. Routledge. Routledge.
  51. Thomas A., Lamine C., Allès B., Chiffoleau Y., Doré A., Dubuisson-Quellier S., Hannachi M. (2020). ‘The key roles of economic and social organization and producer and consumer behaviour towards a health-agriculture-food-environment nexus: recent advances and future prospects’. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 101(1): 23-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-020-00115-x.
  52. Ventura F., Milone P., van der Ploeg J.D. (2010). Understanding rural development dynamics. Chapter 1, pp. 1-30. In: Milone P., Ventura F. (eds.) (2010). Networking the rural: the future of green regions in Europe. Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands.