Just Accepted Manuscripts
Research Articles

The role of farmers: governing the farm enterprise, markets, and networks

Just Accepted
  • Pierluigi Milone
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15354

Published 2024-12-18

Keywords

  • Agency,
  • networking,
  • neo-institutional economics,
  • market,
  • sustainability

How to Cite

Milone, P. (2024). The role of farmers: governing the farm enterprise, markets, and networks . Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA). https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15354

Copyright (c) 2024 Pierluigi Milone

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Being a farmer is far more complex than we often consider. The job includes the capacity to organise and combine factors of production (land, capital and especially labour) and simultaneously meet the needs of consumers and many other things. To do so, the farmer has to face, time and again, strategic choices related to the “make or buy” decision that concern, and materially affect, the boundaries of the farm’s operations. This article argues that agency and networking are crucial concepts in the analysis of such choices. These two concepts are also at the heart of rural studies. Here the focus will be on agency as strategic in the active organisation, combination and development of factors of production. In turn networking is central in the construction of (new) markets and other solutions to day to day or strategic problems. This article will use the experience of nested markets, as seen through the neo-institutional approach with a focus on transaction costs, to highlight that strategically organising production factors is central to being a farmer. It is a capacity that needs to be developed and strengthened rather than replaced and/or externalized. This applies especially when farmers seek to realign themselves with the needs of the environment and society.

Just Accepted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Addai G., Abunyewah M., Erdiaw-Kwasie M.O., Okyere S.A., Gyensare M.A., Guodaar L. (2023). Application of the rural web framework within the context of sustainable development: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(5), 4239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054239.
  2. Aoki M. (1984). The Co-operative Game Theory of the Firm. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  3. Benvenuti B. (1975) General system theory and enterpreneurial autonomy in farming: towards a new feudalism or towards democratic planriing, Sociologia Ruralis vol. XV.
  4. Chandler A. (1982). The M-Form: Industrial groups American style. European Economic Review, 19(1): 3-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(82)90003-4.
  5. Coase H.R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386-405. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626876.
  6. Cook K.S., Whitmeyer J.M. (2003). Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1): 109-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.000545.
  7. Darré J.P. (1999). La production de connaissance dans les groupes locaux d’agriculteurs. In: Chauveau J.-P., Cormier Salem M-C., Mollard E. (eds.), L’Innovation en Agriculture: Questions de méthodes et terrains d’observation. Paris: IRD, p. 93-112. (A Travers Champs). ISBN 2-7099-1442-5. ISSN 0998-4658.
  8. Darré J.P. (2006). La Recherche Co-active de Solutions entre Agents de Développement et Agriculteurs. Editions Gret, Cnearc, Gerdal.
  9. Dudek D.J., Wiener J.B. (1996). Joint Implementation, Transaction Costs, and Climate Change. OECD, Paris.
  10. Emirbayer M., Mische A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4): 962-1023. Published by: The University of Chicago Press, Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/231294.
  11. Farnworth C.R., Badstue L., Williams G.J., Tegbaru A., Gaya H.I.M. (2020). Unequal partners: Associations between power, agency and benefits among women and men maize farmers in Nigeria. Gender, Technology and Development, 24(3): 271-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2020.1794607.
  12. Grossman S.J., Hart O.D. (1986). Cost and benefit of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4): 691-719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261404.
  13. Guinjoan E., Badia A., Tulla A.F. (2016). The new paradigm of rural development. Theoretical considerations and reconceptualisation using the rural web. Bulletin of Spanish Association of Geography, 71: 495-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21138/bage.2279.
  14. Hart G., Moore J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6): 1119-1158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261729.
  15. Horlings I., Marsden T. (2010). The new rural paradigm and redefining the rural web. In: Milone P., Ventura F. (eds.), Networking the rural, the future of green regions in Europe. Book Title? Royal van Gorcum. Assen, The Netherlands.
  16. Kabeer N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3): 435-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 7660.00125.
  17. Kanemasu Y., Sonnino R., Marsden T. (2010). Rural development in Devon: Exploring the dynamics of an emerging web. In: Ploeg J.D., Marsden T. (eds.), Networking the Rural, The Future of Green Regions in Europe. Royal van Gorcum: Assen, The Netherlands, 2010; pp. 108-127.
  18. Knight F.H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
  19. Marglin S. (1974). What do bosses do? Review of Radical Political Economy, 6: 33-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/048661347400600206.
  20. Marsden T., Murdoch J., Lowe P., Munton R., Flynn A. (1993). Constructing the Countryside. London: UCL Press.
  21. Murdoch J. (2006). Networking rurality: Emergent complexity in the countryside. In: edited by Cloke P., Marsden T., Mooney P.H. (eds.), Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608016.
  22. Menghi A., Ruffatto S. (2022). I costi di produzione del latte nel 2021 in Veneto si impennano. Stalle da Latte n. 3 - Edizioni l’Informatore Agrario, Verona.
  23. Menard C. (2006). Hybrid organisation of production and distribution. Revista de Anàlisis Econòmico, 21(2): 25-41. RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00273872.
  24. Messely L., Rogge E., Dessein J. (2013). Using the rural web in dialogue with regional stakeholders. Journal of Rural Studies. 32: 400-410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.09.002.
  25. Milone P. (2009). Agriculture in transition. Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands.
  26. Milone P., Ventura F. (2000). Theory and practice of multi-product farms: Farm butcheries in Umbria. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4): 452-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00160.
  27. Milone P., Ventura F. (eds.) (2010). Networking the Rural: The future of green regions in Europe, European perspectives on rural development. ISSN 2352-5614, Published by Royal Van Gorcum, The Netherlands.
  28. Nash J.F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Mathematics, 36(1): 48-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48.
  29. Nisticò R. (2009). Contratti incompleti e teorie del make-or-buy: modelli consolidati e alcuni sviluppi recenti. Economia Politica, XXVI(2): 353-408.
  30. Pasini C.S. (2013). Economia Industriale. Economia dei mercati imperfetti. Luiss University Press, Roma.
  31. Ploeg J.D. van der (1990). Labour, Markets and Agricultural Production. Boulder, Westeview Press.
  32. Ploeg J.D van der (1994). Styles of farming: An introductory note on concepts and methodology. In: Ploeg J.D. van der, Long A. (eds.), Born from Within: Practice and perspective of endogenous rural development. Assen, Van Gorcum.
  33. Ploeg J.D. van der (2000). Revitalising agriculture: Farming economically as a starting ground for rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4): 497-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00163.
  34. Ploeg J.D. van der (2003). The Virtual Farmer. Van Gorcum, Assen.
  35. Ploeg J.D., Marsden T. (2008). Unfolding Webs, the Dynamics of Regional Rural Development. Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 1-244.
  36. Rashid M.F., Sulaiman N.K., Misnan S.H., Samsudin N.A., Ngah I. (2020). Application of rural web in analysing the economic performance of rural areas in Johor. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 447: 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012067.
  37. Saccomandi V. (1991). Istituzioni di Economia dei Mercati Agricoli. REDA, Roma.
  38. Saccomandi V. (1998). Agricultural Market Economics: A neo-institutional analysis of the exchange, circulation and distribution of agricultural products. Royal van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands-
  39. Simon H.A. (1947). Administrative Behaviour. New York, Macmillan.
  40. Stigler G.J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69: 213-225.
  41. Stigler G.J. (1968). The Organization of Industry. Chicago, Chicago University Press.
  42. Tirole J. (1991). Teoria dell’organizzazione Industriale, Hoepli, Milano. Titolo originale: The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1988.
  43. Vatiero, M. (2010), Fallimento o assenza di mercato? Il caso della transazione globale in una prospettiva di law and economics, Ianus Diritto e Finanza, 2-3. ISSN 1 1974-9805
  44. Ventura F. (2001). Organizzarsi per Sopravvivere. Tesi di PhD, Wageningen University Press, The Netherlands.
  45. Williamson O.E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. Social Science Electronic Publishing, New York.
  46. Williamson O.E. (1981). The economics of organisation: A transaction costs approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548-577. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227496.
  47. Williamson O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Firms, markets and relational contracting. The Free Press, New York; transl. it. Le istituzioni economiche del capitalismo. Milan, Franco Angeli, 1987.
  48. Williamson O.E. (1998). I Meccanismi del Governo. L’economia dei costi di transizione: concetti, strumenti, applicazioni. Franco Angeli, Milano.
  49. Williamson O.E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595-613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595.