Vol. 78 No. 2 (2023)
Digitalisation and just transition - Research Articles

Politics of forests and environmental data: Innovation from above, innovation from below, and conflicts over land use and property in Sweden

PDF
  • Cristian Alarcon
Cristian Alarcon
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14676

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • digitalisation,
  • politics of forest,
  • politics of data,
  • forestry,
  • land use,
  • biodiversity,
  • conflicts,
  • datafication
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Alarcon, C. (2023). Politics of forests and environmental data: Innovation from above, innovation from below, and conflicts over land use and property in Sweden. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA), 78(2), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14676

Copyright (c) 2023 Cristian Alarcon

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper offers an exploratory analysis of the links between the politics of forest and struggles over environmental data in Sweden. The term politics of data is used to analyse data production orientated to productivity-oriented forestry and the use of digital technologies that allow ordinary citizens to produce data and knowledge on forests and biodiversity in Sweden. While both processes can be understood as innovation, they differ in terms of drivers and actors. The paper proposes to approach the former process as innovation from above, and the latter process will be understood as innovation from below. In this regard, the main argument to be developed in the paper is that these two forms of innovation reveal the key role of struggles on environmental data in the political interlinkages between contemporary land and property questions in forest and forestry in Sweden. By looking at data production from below, the paper attempts to bring a more dynamic understanding of the production, use and exchange of innovations for data production in environmental conflicts. The empirical analysis of the paper is based on cases where the role of data production in discussions on forestry in Sweden show contestation about the procedures to produce data and its use through digital transformations. These cases will serve to discuss the relations between political struggles over data and knowledge produced through digital tools, how land use and property are politically contested in the context of forestry, and how digital platforms for data production and management also become tools for incipient forms of democratization of knowledge production and innovation in decision making concerning forest and biodiversity.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Alarcón-Ferrari C., Jönsson M., Do T., Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot S., Chiwona-Karltun L., Mark-Herbert C., Manuschevich D., Powell N., Ruete A., Hilding-Rydevik T., Bishop K. An Analysis of Citizen Science Supporting Environmental Monitoring and Assessment of Sustainable Development Goal 15 in Rural Settings of Chile and Sweden. Unpublished manuscript.
  2. Alarcón-Ferrari C., Jönsson M., Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot S., Chiwona-Karltun L., Mark-Herbert C., Manuschevich D., Powell N., Do T., Bishop K., Hilding-Rydevik T. (2021). Citizen Science as Democratic Innovation That Renews Environmental Monitoring and Assessment for the Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Areas. Sustainability, 13, 2762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052762
  3. Arnqvist G., Alström P., Angelstam P., Bengtsson J. (2023). Falsk marknadsföring om hållbart skogsbruk.
  4. Aronsson U. (2021). Han har rapporterat in över 600 fynd av knärot.
  5. Artdatabanken, n.d. Artdatabanken. Ett kunskapscentrum för arter och naturtyper | SLU [WWW Document]. SLU.SE. URL https://www.artdatabanken.se/
  6. Artportalen, n.d. Artportalen [WWW Document]. URL https://www.artportalen.se/
  7. Bakker K. (2022). The Sounds of Life: How Digital Technology Is Bringing Us Closer to the Worlds of Animals and Plants. Princeton University Press.
  8. Beraldo D., Milan S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
  9. Biosfärområde Voxnadalen, 12.05. Unescoansökan [WWW Document]. URL https://www.ovanaker.se/boendeochmiljo/klimatochmiljo/biosfaromradevoxnadalen/publikationer/unescoansokan.2290.html
  10. BirdLife Sverige (2019a). BirdLife Sverige överklagar kontroversiellt domslut om skogsbruk.
  11. BirdLife Sverige (2019b). Överklagande av mark- och miljödomstolens beslut att tillåta avverkning av skog som bedöms vara värdefull för bevarande av lavskrika på fastigheterna Arbrå kyrkby 13:16, 13:19, 13:3 samt 8:3 i Bollnäs kommun, Gävleborgs län.
  12. Burawoy M., Wright E.O. (2002). Sociological marxism. In: Handbook of Sociological Theory. Springer, pp. 459-486.
  13. Burrell J., Fourcade M. (2021). The society of algorithms. Annual Review of Sociology, 47: 213-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800
  14. Ceccherini G., Duveiller G., Grassi G., Lemoine G., Avitabile V., Pilli R., Cescatti A. (2020). Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature, 583: 72-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2438-y
  15. Ceccherini G., Duveiller G., Grassi G., Lemoine G., Avitabile V., Pilli R., Cescatti A. (2021). Reply to Wernick I.K. et al.; Palahí M. et al.. Nature, 592: E18-E23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03294-9
  16. County Administrative Board in Gävleborg (2014). Länsprogram för regional miljöövervakning i Gävleborgs län 2015-2020.
  17. Dagens Nyheter (2020). Fågeln som blivit symbol för striden om skogen.
  18. Dalton C.M., Taylor L., Thatcher J. (2016). Critical data studies: A dialog on data and space. Big Data & Society, 3(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716648346.
  19. Ekologigruppen AB (2015). Naturinventering vid Gavlehov, Gävle kommun.
  20. European Comission (2021). New EU Forest Strategy for 2030.
  21. Fraser N. (2017). Behind Marx’s hidden abode: For an expanded conception of capitalism. In: Deutscher P., Lafont C. (eds.), Critical Theory in Critical Times: Transforming the Global Political and Economic Order. Columbia University Press, pp. 141-159.
  22. Gabrys J. (2020). Smart forests and data practices: from the internet of trees to planetary governance. Big Data & Society, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720904871
  23. Gabrys J., Westerlaken M., Urzedo D., Ritts M., Simlai T. (2022). Reworking the political in digital forests: The cosmopolitics of socio-technical worlds. Progress in Environmental Geography, 1(1-4): 58-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687221117836.
  24. Gävleborg County (2016). Inventering av ängssvampar i Gävleborgs län 2015.
  25. Goldstein J., Nost E. (2022). The nature of data: Infrastructures, environments, politics. U of Nebraska Press.
  26. Goodman D. (2023). Transforming Agriculture and Foodways: The Digital-Molecular Convergence. Policy Press.
  27. Hertog I.M., Brogaard S., Krause T. (2022). Barriers to expanding continuous cover forestry in Sweden for delivering multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem services, 53, 101392. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101392
  28. Iliadis A., Russo F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716674238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716674238
  29. Jacobs H.M. (eds.) (1998). Preface. In: Who Owns America?: Social Conflict over Property Rights. University of Wisconsin Press.
  30. Kasperowski D., Hagen N. (2022). Making particularity travel: Trust and citizen science data in Swedish environmental governance. Social studies of science, 52(3): 447-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221085241
  31. Landlantbruk (2018). Fågelklubbens uppgifter stoppar nya avverkningar.
  32. Lavskrikan i Gävleborg med artportalen - PDF Free Download [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://docplayer.se/48454394-Lavskrikan-i-gavleborg-med-artportalen.html
  33. LEADER Nedre Dalälven (2015). Final report from a project with support from LEADER Nedre Dalälven in the context of the regional landscape strategy.
  34. Marissink M. (2022). Replik: “Artportalen är ett verktyg som bidrar”.
  35. McKinsey & Company (2020). Data: the next wave in forestry productivity.
  36. MISTRA (2020). Mistra Digital Forest’s annual report.
  37. MISTRA (2021). Mistra Digital Forest’s annual report.
  38. Naturskyddsföreningen Nordanstig, n.d. Artskyddet i Sverige – rödlistning och fridlysning [WWW Document]. URL http://ns1.bergsjodata.com/naturskyddsforeningen/NATURKUNSKAP/Fridlysning/fridlysning.htm
  39. Naturvårdsverket (2009). Åtgärdsprogram för sötgräs.
  40. Naturvårdsverket and länsstyrelserna (2004). Skyddsvärda statliga skogar i mellersta Sverige [WWW Document]. Naturvårdsverket. URL https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Stod-i-miljoarbetet/Vagledningar/Skyddad-natur/Skyddsvarda-statliga-skogar/Skyddsvarda-statliga-skogar-i-mellersta-Sverige/
  41. OECD (2015). Data-Driven Innovation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en
  42. Östersunds tingsrätt (2019). Dom Mål nr M 2163-18 Mark- och miljödomstole.
  43. Paneque-Gálvez J., Vargas-Ramírez N., Napoletano B.M., Cummings A. (2017). Grassroots innovation using drones for indigenous mapping and monitoring. Land, 6(4), 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land6040086
  44. Pettersson R. (2020). Äganderätten och de gröna näringarna. ungl. Skogs- och Lantbruksakademiens TIDSKRIFT nr 5 2020.
  45. Roos S., Skarp L.S., Svensson M., Tranvik L. (2019). “Domstol underkänner ideella naturvårdens trovärdighet”. DN.SE.
  46. Ruppert E., Isin E., Bigo D. (2017). Data politics. Big data & society, 4, 2053951717717749.
  47. Sadowski J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big data & society, 6(1), 2053951718820549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
  48. Sassen S. (2002). Towards a sociology of information technology. Current Sociology, 50(3): 365-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003005
  49. Skogsstyrelsen (2022). Levande skogar. Fördjupad utvärdering 2023.
  50. SOU L. (2019). Sveriges miljöövervakning-dess uppgift och organisation för en god miljöförvaltning, Del 1 & 2. Betänkande av Utredningen om översyn av miljöövervakningen, Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2019: 22. Statens Offentliga Utredningar, SOU 2019: 22.
  51. Svenska Kraftnät (2012). Förlängning av koncession 220 kv kraftledning stadsforsen - hölleforsen - untra.
  52. Swyngedouw E. (2019). The urbanization of capital and the production of capitalist natures. In: Vidal M., Smith T., Rotta T., Prew P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. Oxford University Press.
  53. Torto M., Kristofersson A. (2023). Digitally transforming in a traditional industry: a senior management perspective.
  54. Towards harmonised forest monitoring and reporting for the EU (2023). Towards harmonised forest monitoring and reporting for the EU – Swedish Presidency Summary from the workshop arranged on 1-2 February 2023, Uppsala, Sweden.
  55. Urzedo D., Westerlaken M., Gabrys J. (2023). Digitalizing forest landscape restoration: A social and political analysis of emerging technological practices. Environmental Politics, 32: 485-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2091417
  56. Wajcman J. (2002). Addressing technological change: The challenge to social theory. Current sociology, 50(3): 347-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050003004
  57. Wennblad P. (2022). Aktivister på semester styr i skogen.
  58. Wernick I.K., Ciais P., Fridman J., Högberg P., Korhonen K.T., Nordin A., Kauppi P.E. (2021). Quantifying forest change in the European Union. Nature, 592: E13-E14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03293-w