Vol. 77 No. 2 (2022)
Research Articles

Scientific information and cognitive bias in the case of New Breeding Techniques: exploring Millennials behaviour in Italy

PDF
  • Federica DeMaria,
  • Annalisa Zezza
Federica DeMaria
CREA – Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy
Annalisa Zezza
CREA – Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13676

Published 2022-08-04

Keywords

  • genome editing,
  • millennials,
  • food safety,
  • environmental risks,
  • biotechnology,
  • Multinomial Logistic Regression
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

DeMaria, F. ., & Zezza, A. (2022). Scientific information and cognitive bias in the case of New Breeding Techniques: exploring Millennials behaviour in Italy. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics (REA), 77(2), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13676
Copyright Notice

Abstract

The paper explores consumers’ acceptance of New Breeding Techniques (NBTs) in the agri-food sector. Our main research question concerns the role of information in shaping consumers’ attitude towards genetically modified food and new breeding techniques in agricultural production. To this extent, we use a Multinomial Logit Model to analyse changes or confirmations of prior opinions on food safety concerns and environmental risks associated with modern biotechnologies once scientific information has been provided. Our findings confirm the Bayesian hypothesis according to which people combine their prior belief with new information to converge scientific information in the case of food safety. We also found a higher probability of confirmation bias, with people less willing to change their prior beliefs, when environmental risks are concerned.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Ball D.J., Boehmer-Christiansen S. (2007). Societal concerns and risk decisions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 144(1-2): 556-563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.070.
  2. Beghin J.C., Gustafson C.R. (2021). Consumer valuation of and attitudes towards novel foods produced with new plant engineering techniques: A review. Sustainability, 13(20), 11348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011348.
  3. Bertuol‐Garcia D., Morsello C., El‐Hani C.N., Pardini R. (2018). A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation. Biological Reviews, 93(2): 1032-1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12385 .
  4. Bollani L., Bonadonna A., Peira G. (2019). The millennials’ concept of sustainability in the food sector. Sustainability, 11(10), 2984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102984.
  5. Bredahl L. (2001). Determinants of consumers attitudes and purchase intentions with regards to genetically modified foods – results of a cross-national survey. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24: 23-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950406128.
  6. Broll H., Braeuning A., Lampen A. (2019). European Court of Justice decision for genome editing: Consequences on food/feed risk assessment and detection. Food Control, 104: 288-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.05.002.
  7. Buis M. (2014). (https://stats.stackexchange.com/users/23853/maarten-buis), Positive coefficient but negative marginal effect in mlogit.
  8. Busch G., Ryan E., von Keyserlingk M.A., Weary D.M. (2021). Citizen views on genome editing: effects of species and purpose. Agriculture and Human Values, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10235-9
  9. Callaway E. (2018). CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union. Nature, 560(7716): 16-17. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-05814-6
  10. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., Lagerkvist C.J. (2007). Consumer benefits of labels and bans on GM foods-choice experiments with Swedish consumers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1): 152-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00969.x
  11. Cavaliere A., Ventura V. (2018). Mismatch between food sustainability and consumer acceptance toward innovation technologies among Millennial students: The case of Shelf Life Extension. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175: 641-650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.087.
  12. Coderoni S., Perito M.A. (2021). Approaches for reducing wastes in the agricultural sector. An analysis of Millennials’ willingness to buy food with upcycled ingredients. Waste Management, 126: 283-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.018
  13. Colson G., Rousu M.C. (2013) What do consumer surveys and experiments reveal and conceal about consumer preferences for genetically modified foods? GM Crops & Food, 4(3): 158-165. DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.26322.
  14. Costa-Fonta M., Gil J.M., Traill W.B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy, 33: 99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002.
  15. Costanigro M., Lusk J. (2014). The signaling effect of mandatory labels on genetically engineered food. Food Policy, 49(1): 259-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.08.005.
  16. Curtis K.R., McCluskey J.J., Swinnen J.F. (2008). Differences in global risk perceptions of biotechnology and the political economy of the media. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8(1-2): 77-89. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017261.
  17. Dederer H.-G., Hamburger D. (eds.) (2021). Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks of Selected Countries and the EU. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17119-3.
  18. Delwaide A-C, Nalley L.L., Dixon B.L., Danforth D.M., Nayga R.M. Jr, Van Loo E.J., Verbeke W. (2015). Revisiting GMOs: Are there differences in European consumers’ acceptance and valuation for cisgenically vs transgenically bred rice? PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0126060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126060.
  19. De Marchi E., Cavaliere A., Banterle A. (2021). Consumer choice behavior for cisgenic food: Exploring the role of time preferences. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(2): 866-891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/a.epp.13043
  20. De Marchi E., Cavaliere A., Banterle A. (2020). Identifying motivations for acceptance of cisgenic food: Results from a randomized controlled choice experiment. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47(1): 128-144. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309882.
  21. EASAC (2013). Planting the future: opportunities and challenges for using crop genetic improvement technologies for sustainable agriculture, German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina 2013. ISBN: 978-3-8047-3181-3.
  22. Edenbrandt A.K., House L.A., Gao Z., Olmstead M., Gray D. (2018). Consumer acceptance of cisgenic food and the impact of information and status quo. Food Quality and Preference, 69: 44-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.04.007.
  23. Fernbach P.M., Light N., Scott S.E., Inbar Y., Rozin P. (2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nat Hum Behav 3: 251-256 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3 .
  24. Ferrari L., Baum C.M., Banterle A., De Steur H. (2020). Attitude and labelling preferences towards gene-edited food: a consumer study amongst millennials and Generation Z. British Food Journal 123(3): 1268-1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2020-0820
  25. Frewer L.J., van der Lans I.A., Fischer A.R., Reinders M.J., Menozzi D., Zhang X., Zimmermann K.L. (2013). Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification˗a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 30(2): 142-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2013.01.003.
  26. Frewer L.J., Fischer A.R.H., Brennan M., Bánáti D., Lion R., Meertens R.M., Rowe G., Siegrist M., Verbeke W., Vereijken C.M.J.L. (2016). Risk/benefit communication about food a systematic review of the literature.
  27. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 56(10): 1728-1745. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2013.801337.
  28. Frewer L.J. (2017). Consumer acceptance and rejection of emerging agrifood technologies and their applications. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44(4): 683-704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbx007.
  29. Gaskell G., Allum N., Stares S., Fjæstad B., Öhman S., Olofsson A. (2003). Europeans and biotechnology in 2002 - Eurobarometer 58.0 : a report to the EC Directorate General for Research from the project “Life Sciences in European Society”.
  30. Gaskell G., Bauer M.W., Durant J., Allum N.C. (1999). Worlds apart? The reception of genetically modified foods in Europe and the U.S. Science, 285(5426): 384-387. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5426.384.
  31. Grunert K.G., Lähteenmäki L., Nielsen N.A., Poulsen J.B., Ueland O., Åström A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of food products involving genetic modification — results from a qualitative study in four Nordic countries. Food Qual Prefer, 12: 527-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00049-0.
  32. Halford N.G. (2019). Legislation governing genetically modified and genome‐edited crops in Europe: the need for change. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(1): 8-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9227.
  33. Helliwell R., Hartley S., Pearce W. (2019). NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing. Agriculture and Human Values, 36(4): 779-791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09956-9.
  34. Hermosaningtyas A.A. (2021). Factor affecting public acceptance on genetically modified food: A review. Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology and Biodiversity, 5(3): 112-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47007/ijobb.v5i3.92.
  35. Hess S., Lagerkvist C.J., Redekop W., Pakseresht A. (2016). Consumers’ evaluation of biotechnologically modified food products: new evidence from a meta-survey. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(5): 703-736. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbw011.
  36. Huffman W.E., Rousu M., Shogren J.F., Tegene A. (2007). The effects of prior beliefs and learning on consumers ‘acceptance of genetically modified foods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(1): 193-206. 185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.019.
  37. Hossain F., Onyango B., Schilling B., Hallman W., Adelaja A. (2003). Product attributes, consumer benefits and public approval of genetically modified foods. International Journal of Consumer studies, 27: 353-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00303.x.
  38. Hyesun H., Su-Jung N. (2021). The influence of consumers’ knowledge on their responses to genetically modified foods, GM Crops & Food, 12(1): 146-157. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2020.1840911.
  39. Ishii T., Araki M. (2016). Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Reports, 35(7): 1507-1518. 2016-07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2.
  40. Jang S.M. (2014). Seeking congruency or incongruency online? Examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Science Communication, 36(2): 143-167. DOI: 10.1177/1075547013502733
  41. Long J.S., Freese J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. (3rd ed.) Stata Press. ISBN-13: 978-1-59718-111-2.
  42. Lucht J.M. (2015). Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses 7: 4254-4281. DOI: 10.3390/v7082819.
  43. Lusk J.L., Coble K.H. (2005). Risk perceptions, risk preference, and acceptance of risky food. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87: 393-405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00730.x
  44. Lusk J.L., Briggeman B.C. (2011). Selfishness, altruism, and inequality aversion toward consumers and farmers. Agricultural Economics, 42(2): 121-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00478.x
  45. Lusk J.L., House L.O., Valli C., Jaeger S.R., Moore M., Morrow J.L., Traill W.B. (2004). Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(2): 179-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/31.2.179.
  46. Lusk J.L., McFadden B.R., Rickard B.J. (2015). Which biotech foods are most acceptable to the public? Biotechnology Journal, 10(1): 13-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400561.
  47. Lusk J.L., Roosen J., Fox J.A. (2003). Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(1): 16-29. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8276.00100.
  48. Lusk J.L., Roosen J., Bieberstein A. (2014). Consumer acceptance of new food technologies: causes and roots of controversies. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6(1): 381-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012735.
  49. Lusk J.L., Rozan A. (2006). Consumer acceptance of ingenic foods. Biotechnology Journal, 1(12): 1433-1434. DOI: 10.1002/biot.200600187.
  50. Lusk J.L., McFadden B.R., Wilson N. (2018). Do consumers care how a genetically food was created or who created it? Food Policy, 78: 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.02.007.
  51. Lusser M., Parisi C., Plan D., Rodriguez-Cerezo E. (2012). Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nature Biotechnology, 30(3): 231-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2142.
  52. Malyska A., Bolla R., Twardowski T. (2016). The role of public opinion in shaping trajectories of agricultural biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 34(7): 530-534. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.005.
  53. Marangon F., Troiano S., Carzedda M., Nassivera F. (2021). Consumers’ acceptance of genome edited food and the role of information. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 76(3): 5-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-13115.
  54. Marette S., Disdier A.-C., Beghin J.C. (2021). A comparison of EU and US consumers’ willingness to pay for gene-edited food: Evidence from apples. Appetite, 159, 105064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105064
  55. McCluskey J., Swinnen J. (2011). The media and food‐risk perceptions, Science & Society Series on Food and Science, EMBO Rep, 12: 624-629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2011.118
  56. McFadden B.R., Smyth S.J. (2018). Perceptions of genetically engineered technology in developed areas. Trends Biotechnology, 37(5): 447-451. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.006.
  57. McFadden B.R., Lusk J.L. (2015). Cognitive biases in the assimilation of scientific information on global warming and genetically modified food. Food Policy, 54: 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.010.
  58. McFadden B.R., Lusk J.L. (2016). What consumers don’t know about genetically modified food, and how that affects beliefs. FASEB Journal, 30(9): 3091-3096. DOI: 10.1096/fj.201600598.
  59. McGarry Wolf M., Bertolini P., Shikama I., Bergerd A. (2012). A Comparison of Attitudes Toward Food and Biotechnology in the U.S., Japan, and Italy. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 43(1). DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.139462.
  60. Mishra R., Zhao K. (2018). Genome editing technologies and their applications in crop improvement. Plant Biotechnology Report, 12(2): 57-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-018-0472-0.
  61. Morgan M.G., Henrion M., Small M. (1990). Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840609.
  62. Öz B., Unsal F., Movassaghi H. (2018). Consumer attitudes toward genetically modified food in the United States: Are Millennials different? Journal of Transnational Management, 23(1): 3-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2017.1373316.
  63. Pakseresht A., McFadden B.R., Lagerkvist C.J. (2017). Consumer acceptance of food biotechnology based on policy context and upstream acceptance: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 44: 757-780. DOI: 10.1093/erae/jbx016.
  64. Pham N., Mandel N. (2019). What influences consumer evaluation of genetically modified foods? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(2): 263-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618818168.
  65. Paolino P. (2021). Predicted probabilities and inference with multinomial logit. Political Analysis, 29(3): 416-421. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2020.35
  66. Peterson L.E. (2010). MLOGITROC: Stata module to calculate multiclass ROC Curves and AUC from Multinomial Logistic Regression, Statistical Software Components S457181, Boston College Department of Economics. RePEc:boc:bocode:s457181.
  67. Purnhagen K., Wesseler J. (2021). EU regulation of new plant breeding technologies and their possible economic implications for the EU and beyond. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 43(4): 1621-1637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13084.
  68. Raley M.E., Ragona M., Sijtsema S.J., Fischer A.R., Frewer L.J. (2016). Barriers to using consumer science information in food technology innovations: an exploratory study using Delphi methodology. International Journal of Food Studies, 5: 29-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/5.1.2016.a4.
  69. Ryffel G.U. (2017). I have a dream: organic movements include gene manipulation to improve sustain- able farming. Sustainability, 9(3), 392. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3390/su9030392
  70. Son E., Lim S.S. (2021). Consumer acceptance of gene-edited versus genetically modified foods in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(7), 3805. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073805. PMID: 33917324; PMCID: PMC8038713.
  71. Scott Long J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences, 7. ISBN:9780803973749.
  72. Siegrist M., Connor M., Keller C. (2012). Trust, confidence, procedural fairness, outcome fairness, moral conviction, and the acceptance of GM field experiments. Risk Analysis, 32(8): 1394-1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01739.x
  73. Siegrist M. (2008). Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19: 603-608. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.017.
  74. Slovic P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science (New York, NY), 236: 280-285. DOI: 10.1126/science.3563507.
  75. Van Giesen R.I., Fischer A.R., van Trijp H.C. (2018). Changes in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study. Public Understanding of Science, 27(2): 168-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516661292.
  76. Van Kleef E., Houghton J.R., Krystallis A., Pfenning U., Rowe G., Van Dijk H., Van der Lans I.A., Frewer L.J. (2007). Consumer evaluations of food risk management quality in Europe. Risk Analysis, 27: 1565-1580. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00989.x.
  77. Verbeke W., Frewer L.J., Scholderer J., De Brabander H.F. (2007). Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information. Analytica Chimica Acta, 586: 2-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.07.065.
  78. Wuepper D., Wree P., Ardali G. (2018). Does information change German consumers’ attitudes about genetically modified food? European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(1): 53-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/.
  79. Wunderlich S., Gatto K.A. (2015). Consumer perception of genetically modified organism and sources of information. Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md), 6: 842-851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.008870.
  80. Zimny S., Sowa S. (2021). Potential effects of asymmetric legal classification of gene edited plant products in international trade, from the perspective of the EU. EFB Bioeconomy Journal, 1, 100016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeco.2021.100016.