Vol. 120, No. 1 (Supplement) 2015
Supplement abstract

VEGF response to aerobic training in postmenopause: walking training vs nordic walking

Published 2015-09-30


  • VEGF,
  • Nordic Walking

How to Cite

Izzicupo, P., Ghinassi, B., D’Amico, M., Bascelli, A., Farinacci, S., Carestia, F., Di Blasio, A., Napolitano, G., & Di Baldassarre, A. (2015). VEGF response to aerobic training in postmenopause: walking training vs nordic walking. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, 120(1), 203. Retrieved from https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/ijae/article/view/4159


Menopausal transition leads to increased risk of non-communicable chronic diseases, which are characterized by endothelial disruption and dysfunction. Aerobic physical exercise determines an increase of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a signal protein that stimulates angiogenesis, and recent studies suggest a direct correlation between exercise intensity and VEGF production (1). However, high intensity training is often not recommended for postmenopausal women as a result of cardiovascular and orthopaedic contraindications. The aim of the study was to determine if exercising at the same intensity (i.e. moderate intensity) but involving a more extended muscle mass might induce higher circulating levels of VEGF. Nordic Walking (NW), a form of physical activity where the active use of a pair of dedicated poles is added to regular walking, was compared to walking training (WT). Thirty postmenopausal women were enrolled in the study (57.93±3.55 years old) and randomly assigned to WT (n=15) and NW (n=15). Serum VEGF levels were determined by ELISA before and after exercise training, consisting in three workouts of 40-50 minutes for 13 weeks at intensity between 11 and 13 of a 15-category scale of the ratings of the perceived exertion. The only difference was the use of poles with appropriated technique in NW group. RM-ANOVA with repeated measure for the factor time revealed an effect for time (P=.01) and an interaction effect time x group (P=.041). Post-hoc analysis, consisting in a paired sample t-test for each group, showed that NW increased VEGF whereas WT showed only a tendency (WT: T0=39.68±2.90 T1=40.22±2.56, P=.012; NW: T0=38.22±1.60 T1=42.52±5.97, P=.57). In conclusion, independently from exercise intensity, NW seems to increase VEGF more efficiently than WT, probably as a result of a larger capillary bed actively involved by exercising muscles. This outcome should be taken in consideration when programming exercise training for postmenopausal women.