Just Accepted Manuscripts
SPECIAL ISSUE: Bioregionalism

Bioregioning Tayside: Lessons from a community-led bioregioning initiative in Scotland

PDF
  • Ella Hubbard
Ella Hubbard
Sheffield Hallam University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/contest-16993

Published 2026-10-07

Keywords

  • Bioregioning; community environmentalism; place-based transformation; socio-ecological transformations

How to Cite

Hubbard, E. (2026). Bioregioning Tayside: Lessons from a community-led bioregioning initiative in Scotland. Contesti. Città, Territori, Progetti. https://doi.org/10.36253/contest-16993

Copyright (c) 2026 Ella Hubbard

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Funding data

Abstract

This paper explores practices of bioregioning through Bioregioning Tayside in Scotland. Bioregioning Tayside is a community-led initiative that reconnects human communities to the landscapes they inhabit. This paper explains how Bioregioning Tayside have applied bioregional thought in the context of Scotland. It argues that whilst bioregional practice is plural and place-specific, Bioregioning Tayside offers learnings for global bioregional initiatives: strategies for 1) building critical forms of connection to nature; 2) generating a sense of place that is not inward-looking, but builds solidarity across place and scale; 3) supporting transformative politics that makes space for contestation; and 4) identifying leverage points that are unique to the place in question. The paper also identifies key challenges including discursive politics of ‘bioregioning’, reliance on voluntary contributions, and a continued focus on the bioregion as the primary site of care. The paper contributes to the literature on bioregioning by recording bioregional experiments, connecting global initiatives and sharing the challenges of bioregioning in practice.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Aberley, D. (1999) ‘Interpreting Bioregionalism: A story from many voices’, in M.V. McGinnis (ed.) Bioregionalism. New York: Routledge, pp. 13–42.
  2. Atchison, J. et al. (2024) ‘Peopled landscapes: Questions of coexistence in invasive plant management and rewilding’, People and Nature, 6(2), pp. 458–473. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10598.
  3. Beery, T. et al. (2023) ‘Disconnection from nature: Expanding our understanding of human–nature relations’, People and Nature, 5(2), pp. 470–488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10451.
  4. Benoist, L. (2024) ‘Far-right localism as an environmental strategy in France’, Nordia Geographical Publications [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.30671/nordia.140962.
  5. Burnett, K.A. and Danson, M. (2022) ‘Romance and resilience: The assets and ambition of Scottish “remote rural” enterprise contexts’, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 23(3), pp. 176–187. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503221099210.
  6. Büscher, B. and Fletcher, R. (2019) ‘Towards Convivial Conservation’, Conservation and Society, 17(3), p. 283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_19_75.
  7. Cato, M.S. (2011) ‘Home economics: Planting the seeds of a research agenda for the bioregional economy’, Environmental Values, 20(4), pp. 481–501. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327111x13150367351258.
  8. Cato, M.S. (2012) The Bioregional Economy: Land, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. London: Routledge.
  9. Cato, M.S. (2020) ‘Visioning the bioregional economy’, The Bioregional Economy, pp. 37–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082867-10.
  10. Charles, L. et al. (1981) ‘Where You At? A Bioregional Quiz’, Coevolution Quarterly, 32, p. 1.
  11. Church, S.P. (2015) ‘Exploring urban bioregionalism: A synthesis of literature on urban nature and sustainable patterns of urban living’, Sapiens, 7(1), pp. 1–11.
  12. Danson, M. and Burnett, K.A. (2021) ‘Current Scottish Land Reform and Reclaiming the Commons: Building Community Resilience’, Progress in Development Studies, 21(3), pp. 280–297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14649934211018393.
  13. Davidson, M. (2021) ‘Repeopling Scotland’, Reforesting Scotland, (64), pp. 13–15.
  14. Doyle, C. (2023) ‘Rethinking Communities, Land and Governance: Land Reform in Scotland and the Community Ownership Model’, Planning Theory & Practice, 24(3), pp. 429–441. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2225322.
  15. Esper, S.C. et al. (2017) ‘Supporting alternative organizations? Exploring scholars’ involvement in the performativity of worker-recuperated enterprises’, Organization, 24(5), pp. 671–699. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713218.
  16. Fanfani, D. and Duží, B. (2018) ‘Urban bioregion concept: from theoretical roots to development of an operational framework in the European context’, XXI Conferenza Nazionale SIU | CONFINI, MOVIMENTI, LUOGHI. Politiche e progetti per città e territori in transizione [Preprint].
  17. Fanfani, D. and Matarán Ruiz, A. (eds) (2020) Bioregional Planning and Design: Volume I: Perspectives on a Transitional Century. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45870-6.
  18. Fletcher, R. (2017) ‘Connection with nature is an oxymoron: A political ecology of “nature-deficit disorder”’, The Journal of Environmental Education, 48(4), pp. 226–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1139534.
  19. Fry, T. (2023) ‘“They’re part of what we are”: Interspecies belonging, animal life and farming practice on the Isle of Skye’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(4), pp. 2495–2515. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486231151809.
  20. Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2008) ‘Diverse economies: Performative practices for “other worlds”’, Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), pp. 613–632. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821.
  21. Gibson-Graham, J.K. and Dombroski, K. (eds) (2020) The handbook of diverse economies. Paperback edition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  22. Glenn, S. (Scottish L.C. et al. (2019) ‘Investigation into the Issues Associated with Large scale and Concentrated Landownership in Scotland’, (March), p. 72.
  23. Glotfelty, C. and Quesnel, E. (2015) The biosphere and the bioregion: essential writings of Peter Berg. London: Routledge (Routledge environmental humanities).
  24. Gram‑Hanssen, I., Schafenacker, N. and Bentz, J. (2019) ‘Circular economies for rural renewal: Revitalizing towns and their bioregions’, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 238, pp. 291–300. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2495/SC190261.
  25. Hubbard, E. et al. (2023) ‘Where are you at? Re‐engaging bioregional ideas and what they offer geography’, Geography Compass, 17(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12722.
  26. Hubbard, E. (2024) Bioregioning: Composing a politics of place for living well together. PhD. University of Sheffield. Available at: https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/35321/ (Accessed: 18 February 2025).
  27. Huber, M. (2019) ‘Ecological Politics for the Working Class’, Catalyst. Available at: https://catalyst-journal.com/2019/07/ecological-politics-for-the-working-class (Accessed: 11 December 2023).
  28. Huber, M.T. (2022) Climate change as class war: building socialism on a warming planet. London ; New York: Verso.
  29. James, R.F. and Cato, M.S. (2014) ‘A bioregional economy: A green and post-capitalist alternative to an economy of accumulation’, Local Economy, 29(3), pp. 173–180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214526542.
  30. James, R.F. and Cato, M.S. (2017) ‘A Green Post-capitalist Alternative to a System of Accumulation: A Bioregional Economy’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 28(4), pp. 24–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2017.1393093.
  31. Kuuliala, V.-I.A. (2017) Wild at Sea: The wilderness concept in Scottish and EU environmental and marine conservation, and its interpretations by stakeholders. PhD. University of Kent. Available at: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/63879/1/243Final%20with%20corrections.pdf (Accessed: 3 December 2025).
  32. Massey, D. (1991) ‘A Global Sense of Place’, Marxism Today, June, pp. 24–29.
  33. Muys, B. et al. (2023) ‘From BioCities to BioRegions and Back: Transforming Urban–Rural Relationships’, in G.E. Scarascia-Mugnozza et al. (eds) Transforming Biocities. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Future City), pp. 239–263. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29466-2_10.
  34. Ní Mhathúna, D. (2021) ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge and the relevance of Dùthchas in Gàidhealtachd Environmental Futures’, Scottish Affairs, 30(2), pp. 251–261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3366/scot.2021.0364.
  35. Olsen, J. (2000) ‘The Perils of Rootedness: On Bioregionalism and Right Wing Ecology in Germany’, Landscape Journal, 19(1–2), pp. 73–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.19.1-2.73.
  36. Pickerill, J. (ed.) (2025) Eco-communities: surviving well together. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  37. Plumwood, V. (2008) ‘Shadow Places and the Politics of Dwelling’, Australian Humanities Review, 44, pp. 139–150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22459/AHR.44.2008.
  38. Rigobello, A. and David Evans, J. (2024) ‘Design Terroir: An Eco-social, Relational, Bioregional Approach to Design’, in. DRS2024: Boston. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.269.
  39. Samuel, A.M.M. (2000) ‘Cultural Symbols and Landowners’ Power: The Practice of Managing Scotland’s Natural Resource’, Sociology, 34(4), pp. 691–706. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000420.
  40. Sharma, K. et al. (2023) ‘Glocal woodlands – The rescaling of forest governance in Scotland’, Land Use Policy, 126, p. 106524. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106524.
  41. Thackara, J. (2019) ‘Bioregioning: Pathways to Urban-Rural Reconnection’, She Ji, 5(1), pp. 15–28. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.002.
  42. Wahl, D.C. (2016) Designing regenerative cultures. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
  43. Waldenberger, J. and Savini, F. (2025) ‘Bioregionalism and Degrowth: Addressing the Urban-Other Divide’, Planning Theory & Practice, 26(3), pp. 402–419. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2025.2524106.
  44. Wearne, S. et al. (2023) ‘A learning journey into contemporary bioregionalism’, People and Nature, 5, pp. 2124–2140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10548.
  45. Wearne, S. and Riedy, C. (2024) ‘Whose “place” is it? Using corpus-based techniques to sketch place-based sustainability discourses in public and academic forums’, Sustainability Science, 19(3), pp. 883–904. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01466-w.
  46. Womack, P. (1989) Improvement and Romance: Constructing the myth of the Highlands. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Wright, E.O. (2010) Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.
  48. Zanoni, P. et al. (2017) ‘Post-capitalistic politics in the making: The imaginary and praxis of alternative economies’, Organization, 24(5), pp. 575–588. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508417713219.