2026: Special Issue. Urban and Territorial Resilience. Urbanism Facing Crisis
Special Issue. Urban and Territorial Resilience. Urbanism Facing Crisis

The project in landscapes at risk. Back to architectural design

Bruna Di Palma
Dipartimento di Architettura-Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II

Published 2026-01-29

Keywords

  • resilience,
  • climate change,
  • project,
  • multi-risk,
  • complexity

How to Cite

Di Palma, B., Galante, P., Visconti, F., Talevi, F., & Bosone, M. (2026). The project in landscapes at risk. Back to architectural design. Contesti. Città, Territori, Progetti, 404–421. https://doi.org/10.36253/contest-16542

Abstract

This contribution traces the research conducted within the extended partnership PE3-Return (multi-Risk sciEnce for resilienT commUnities undeR a changiNg climate) and is aimed at explaining the role that architectural design can and must assume in response to the contemporary condition, characterized by the profound changes imposed by climate change. Through the analysis of four case studies, chosen with the aim to compare interventions at different scales – the temporary device, the architectural artefact, the urban landscape and the low-density landscape – the study explore the possibility of overcoming the 'sectoral' and 'deterministic' approach that tends to break down the project into isolated disciplinary and operational domains. ‘Resilience’ is thus adopted in its humanistic, physical and sociological meaning, becoming a potential research tool for a ‘new balance’ to be achieved through methodological and design approaches capable of engaging with complexity, synthesizing diverse forms of knowledge, and fostering a conscious relationship with the built environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bastide Niel 2017, Interview de Winy Maas, architecte urbaniste MVRDV, cordonnateur de la ZAC Bastide Niel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo54tywtrac, (04/24).
  2. Bellmunt J., e Xavier A. 2007, Platja Llarga, Cap de Salou, «Topos», n. 59, pp. 84-88.
  3. Bellmunt J. 2011, Il territorio del turismo. Spazi pubblici e meno, in Sanguineti C., Mele A., Gioiellieri A., «Materia Paesaggio. Salvaguardia, Progettazione e Valorizzazione del Paesaggio in Emilia-Romagna: un percorso formativo», La Mandragora, Firenze, pp. 62–65.
  4. Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer M., Poljanšek K., Clark, I. 2020 (eds.), Science for Disaster Risk Management 2020: acting today, protecting tomorrow, EUR 30183 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  5. Ghisu S., Essere, abitare, costruire, vedere, in «XAOS, Giornale di confine», http://www.spazidelcontemporaneo.net/visual_relation5a60.html, (10/05).
  6. Marini S., Resilienza, in Marini S., Corbellini G. 2016 (eds.), Recycled Theory Dizionario illustrato / Illustrated Dictionary, Quodlibet, Macerata, pp. 532-538.
  7. Malueanda, I., Encabo, E. 2016, Alvaro Siza (2015-2022), «El Croquis», n. 215, pp. 170-184.
  8. MAXXI, Collezione/20: WHATAMI - Studio stARTT, 2020,
  9. https://youtu.be/qzH6B3apAlM?si=itPsoPLpnADswbJM, (04/24).
  10. Miano P., Di Palma B. 2024 (eds.), Paesaggi a rischio. Fragilità vulnerabilità e progetto, LetteraVentidue, Siracusa.
  11. Nunes J. 2022, Paesaggio – Habitat umano, in Cortesi I. (ed.), «Il paesaggio al centro. Natura pubblica e natura operante», Lettera 22, Siracusa, p. 107.
  12. Rossi A. 1966, L’Architettura della città, Marsilio Editori, Padova.
  13. Somival 2013, Etude d’impact - environmental. ZAC Bastide Niel Bordeaux.
  14. STARTT 2011, WHATAMI: diario di cantiere, https://whatamiproject.blogspot.com/, (04/24).
  15. UNISDR 2009, 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, Geneva, Switzerland.
  16. Zenghelis E. 1985, Arcadie. Le pardis transposeè, in «L’Architecture d’Aujourdui», n. 238, p. 55.