Just Accepted Manuscripts
Articles

Redrawing commercial ruins: an integrated methodology for adaptive reuse

Laura Suvieri
University of Catania
Fabio Bianconi
University of Perugia
Marco Filippucci
University of Perugia

Published 2026-05-12

Keywords

  • Adaptive reuse,
  • vacant buildings,
  • typo-morphological analysis,
  • building patterns codification,
  • BIM

Abstract

The ongoing “retail apocalypse” affecting European commercial buildings, largely driven by the rise of e-commerce, underscores the urgent need to develop strategies for the reuse and management of vacant building stock. This context is aggravated by the concerning mismatch between the targets set in the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals and the slow progress toward climate neutrality, which calls for more sustainable and eco-friendly approaches in the construction sector as well. Therefore, formulating adaptive reuse models that reconcile economic viability, promote the introduction of social programs, as well as energy-efficiency retrofitting, is both challenging and imperative for vacant retail boxes. This study proposes a scalable and replicable methodology for the adaptive reuse of disused and decommissioned retail buildings, grounded in comparative analyses of historical and suburban contexts. The approach integrates typo-morphological evaluations with evolutionary assessments to identify both obsolete and persistent architectural components over time. Its aim is to reconceive vacant retail spaces as catalysts for new social and spatial processes, combining BIM-based quantitative analysis with qualitative insights that are often overlooked in architectural practice. Applied to the Austrian context through the regeneration of a suburban building near Vienna, the method demonstrates the value of drawing and representation as cognitive and design instruments for codifying architectural language and identifying recurring spatial patterns. The case study highlights the potential of adaptive reuse as a strategy for sustainable suburban redevelopment, one that avoids over-commercialization and limits further land consumption. The proposed model offers a structured evaluative framework for comparable cases and establishes a basis for future forms of automated assessment through advanced representational technologies.

References

  1. 1. Dunham-Jones E, Williamson J (2011) Retrofitting suburbia, updated edition: Urban design solutions for redesigning suburbs. John Wiley & Sons
  2. 2. Suvieri L, Bianconi F, Filippucci M, Lechner A (2025) Commercial ruins. Representative analysis of new neglected marginalities for their adaptive reuse. XY 14:40–57. https://doi.org/10.15168/xy.v8i14.3213
  3. 3. Williamson J, Dunham-Jones E (2021) Case studies in retrofitting suburbia: urban design strategies for urgent challenges. John Wiley & Sons
  4. 4. Dunham-Jones E, Williamson J (2017) Dead and dying shopping malls, re-inhabited. Archit Des 87:84–91 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2220
  5. 5. White JT, Orr A, Jackson C, et al (2023) Averting dead mall syndrome: de-malling and the future of the purpose-built shopping center in large UK cities. J Urban Aff 47:1523–1539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2239957
  6. 6. Cavoto G (2014) Demalling: Una risposta alla dismissione commerciale. Maggioli
  7. 7. Fischli F, Olsen N, Jasper A (2021) Retail Apocalypse. Zurich: gta Verlag
  8. 8. Berry S (2024) Prediction of retail chain failure: examples of recent U.S. retail failures. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4758638
  9. 9. Plevoets B, Van Cleempoel K (2019) Adaptive reuse of the built heritage: Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161440
  10. 10. Wong L (2024) Adaptive reuse: extending the lives of buildings. Birkhäuser DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035629279
  11. 11. Robiglio M (2017) Re-USA. 20 American stories of adaptive reuse. jovis
  12. 12. Takva Ç, Yazgan EÖ (2024) A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS AND METHODS USED IN THE ADAPTIVE REUSE. Int J Conserv Sci 15:479–496. https://doi.org/10.36868/IJCS.2024.01.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36868/IJCS.2024.01.07
  13. 13. Nadkarni RR, Puthuvayi B (2020) A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. J Build Eng 32:101814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814
  14. 14. Della Spina L, Carbonara S, Stefano D, Viglianisi A (2023) Circular evaluation for ranking adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts. Buildings 13:458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020458
  15. 15. de Rubertis Roberto (2002) La città rimossa: strumenti e criteri per l’analisi e la riqualificazione dei margini urbani degradati. Officina, Roma
  16. 16. Castello L (2016) Rethinking the meaning of place: conceiving place in architecture-urbanism. Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315606163
  17. 17. Lechner A, Postiglione G, Gold M, Serrazanetti F (2024) Architectural Affordances - Typologies of Umbau. Thymos Book
  18. 18. Wilkinson SJ, Remøy H, Langston C (2014) Sustainable building adaptation: innovations in decision-making. John Wiley & Sons DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118477151
  19. 19. de Rubertis R (2008) La città mutante: indizi di evoluzionismo in architettura. F. Angeli
  20. 20. Muratori S (1960) Studi per una operante storia urbana di Venezia . Istituto poligrafico dello Stato, Roma
  21. 21. Arís CM, Laurenzi E (1998) Le variazioni dell’identità: il tipo in architettura. CittàStudi
  22. 22. Moneo R (1978) On Typology. Oppositions
  23. 23. Lechner A (2021) Thinking Design: Blueprint for an Architecture of Typology. Park Books, Zürich
  24. 24. Mumford L (1961) The City in History: its Origins, its Transformations, and its Prospects. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
  25. 25. Jacoby S (2015) Typal and typological reasoning: a diagrammatic practice of architecture. J Archit 20:938–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2015.1116104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2015.1116104
  26. 26. de Rubertis R (2012) Darwin architetto: l’evoluzione in architettura e oltre. Edizioni Scientifiche e Artistiche, Napoli
  27. 27. Saaty TL (1982) The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A New Approach to Deal with Fuzziness in Architecture. Archit Sci Rev 25:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.1982.9696499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.1982.9696499
  28. 28. Lehne A, Meissl G, Hann E (1990) Wiener Warenhäuser, 1865-1914. Franz Deuticke