Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026)
Articles

Leveraging Digital Elevation Models for Data-driven Assessment of Evolutionary Damage in Built Heritage

PDF
  • Manlio Montuori
Manlio Montuori
Department of Architecture, University of Ferrara, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/tema-16931

Published 2026-01-29

Keywords

  • Built heritage,
  • Damage assessment,
  • Kinematic phenomena,
  • Out-of-plane overturning mechanism,
  • Scan-to-HBIM

Copyright (c) 2026 TEMA Technologies Engineering Materials Architecture

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The paper aims to illustrate how implementing a digital elevation model enables an extensive comprehension of the current deformation crisis state of overturning masonry in the context of a case study. The approach explores the interoperability challenges and details in scan-to-HBIM processes, thereby elucidating how HBIM models can support operations that are intended to maintain and preserve extant historic assets despite the persistent challenges. This illustrative investigation underscores the effectiveness of applying digital technologies to advance the conservation and management practices of built cultural heritage, particularly in addressing structural concerns associated with historic masonry. The information should involve meticulous knowledge, anamnesis, visual inspection, and instrumental measures, as dataset accuracy is crucial in architectural heritage, where surveyed objects exhibit complex geometries and significant deformation. It is a deliberate, synthetic operation that develops a structural model for assessment. A key finding of the present paper is that the precision and detail of the model determine the accuracy of structural analysis results, emphasising the importance of accuracy consideration to achieve meaningful and reliable results. As a consequence, the building assessment demonstrated which parts of the building’s façades were overturning while identifying the thorough kinematic phenomena progressively acting.

PDF

References

  1. Nieto-Julián JE, Farratell J, Bouzas Cavada M, Moyano J (2022) Collaborative Workflow in an HBIM Project for the Restoration and Conservation of Cultural Heritage. Int J Archit Herit 17(11):1813–1832. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2022.2073294
  2. Barbagallo A, Bonora M, Marchi G (2004) Analisi degli schemi distributivi e strutturali degli edifici ferraresi di culto nei sec. XV–XVIII. In: Fabbri R (ed) Ferrara Architettura 1. Edifici di culto, Ferrara
  3. Tucci G, Bonora V, Conti A, Fiorini L (2017) High-quality 3D models and their use in a cultural heritage conservation project. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2/W5:687–693
  4. Lagomarsino S (2018) Damage survey of ancient churches: The Umbria-Marche experience. In: Bernardini A (ed) Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings, 1st edn. Routledge, pp 81–94
  5. Xu Z, Yang J, Peng C, Wu Y, Jiang X, Li R, Zheng Y, Gao Y, Liu S, Tian B (2014) Development of an UAS for post-earthquake disaster surveying and its application in Ms7.0 Lushan Earthquake, Sichuan, China. Comput Geosci 68:22–30
  6. Wu B, Tang S (2015) Review of geometric fusion of remote sensing imagery and laser scanning data. Int J Image Data Fusion 6(2):97–114
  7. Balletti C, Guerra F, Scocca V, Gottardi C (2015) 3D integrated methodologies for the documentation and the virtual reconstruction of an archaeological site. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XL-5/W4:215–222
  8. Moyano J, Nieto-Julián JE, Lenin LM, Bruno S (2021) Operability of Point Cloud Data in an Architectural Heritage Information Model. Int J Archit Herit 16(10):1588–1607. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2021.1900951
  9. Mandirola M, Casarotti C, Peloso S, Lanese I, Brunesi E, Senaldi I (2022) Use of UAS for damage inspection and assessment of bridge infrastructures. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 72:102824
  10. Yang X, Grussenmeyer P, Koehl M, Macher H, Murtiyoso A, Landes T (2020) Review of built heritage modelling: integration of HBIM and other information techniques. J Cult Herit 46:350–360
  11. Currà E, D’Amico A, Angelosanti M (2021) Representation and knowledge of historic construction: HBIM for structural use in the case of Villa Palma-Guazzaroni in Terni. TEMA 7(1):8–20
  12. Ursini A, Grazzini A, Matrone F, Zerbinatti M (2022) From scan-to-BIM to a structural finite elements model of built heritage for dynamic simulation. Autom Constr 142:104518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104518
  13. Bruno S, De Fino M, Fatiguso F (2017) Historic Building Information Modeling towards building diagnostic data management. A case study. TEMA 3(2):99–110
  14. Fang JW, Sun Z, Zhang YR (2021) TLS-FEM integrated structural deformation analysis on the beamless hall at Nanjing, China. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLVI-M-1-2021:215–220
  15. Parisi P, Lo Turco M, Giovannini EC (2019) The value of knowledge through h-BIM models: historic documentation with a semantic approach. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2/W9:581
  16. Adami A, Scala B, Treccani D, Dufour N, Papandrea K (2023) HBIM approach for heritage protection: first experiences for a dedicated training. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLVIII-M-2-2023:11–18
  17. Bagnolo V, Argiolas R, Cuccu A (2019) HBIM for archaeological sites: from SFM based survey to algorithmic modelling. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XLII-2:57–63
  18. Chukwuma JO, Smit JL (2022) A systematic review and meta-analysis of Digital elevation model (DEM) fusion: pre-processing, methods and applications. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 188:1–29
  19. Galvez F, Sorrentino L, Dizhur D, Ingham J (2021) Using DEM to Investigate Boundary Conditions for Rocking URM Facades Subjected to Earthquake Motion. J Struct Eng 147(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003171
  20. Pantò B, Giresini L, Casapulla C (2024) Discrete macro-models of nonlinear interlocking mechanisms in the out-of-plane failure of masonry walls. Meccanica 60:2019–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-024-01883-2
  21. Nale M, Benvenuti E, Chiozzi A, Minghini F, Tralli A (2023) Effect of uncertainties on seismic fragility for out-of-plane collapse of unreinforced masonry walls. J Build Eng 75:106936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106936
  22. Angelillo M, Fortunato A, Gesualdo A, Iannuzzo A, Zuccaro G (2018) Rigid block models for masonry structures. Int J Mason Res Innov 3(4):349–368
  23. Willis C, Griffith M, Lawrence S (2004) Horizontal bending of unreinforced clay brick masonry walls. Mason Int 17:109–121
  24. Borri A, Corradi M, De Maria A (2020) The Failure of Masonry Walls by Disaggregation and the Masonry Quality Index. Heritage 3(4):1162–1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage3040065
  25. Malena M, Portioli F, Gagliardo R, Tomaselli G, Cascini L, Felice G (2019) Collapse mechanism analysis of historic masonry structures subjected to lateral loads: A comparison between continuous and discrete models. Comput Struct 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.04.005
  26. De Fino M, Galantucci RA, Fatiguso F (2023) Condition assessment of heritage buildings via photogrammetry: a scoping review from the perspective of decision makers. Heritage 11:7031–7066
  27. Falcão AP, Gonçalves AB, Machete R, Silva J, Bento R (2025) Dimensions of interoperability in BIM-supported seismic structural studies: Application to the H-BIM of the chalet of the countess of Edla in Sintra, Portugal. J Cult Herit 72:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.12.010
  28. Saygi G, Remondino F (2013) Management of Architectural Heritage Information in BIM and GIS: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives. Int J Herit Digit Era 2:695–714. https://doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.2.4.695