Just Accepted Manuscripts
Articles

Resilience and Operability in Post-Disaster Scenarios: Case Study of a Defined Set of Churches after the L'Aquila Earthquake

PDF
  • Cristina Cantagallo,
  • Valentino Sangiorgio
Cristina Cantagallo
University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara
Bio
Valentino Sangiorgio
University “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/tema-16920

Published 2025-12-04

Keywords

  • Architectural engineering,
  • Built heritage,
  • Resilience,
  • Earthquake,
  • Church

Abstract

The digitization of built heritage is essential for safeguarding cultural and historical assets, particularly in the face of disruptive events. In this context, this paper assesses the resilience and operability of existing churches, supported by a comprehensive digitization workflow and a large dataset of data. Specifically, the work focuses on 26 churches of the Sulmona-Valva Diocese damaged during the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. The proposed workflow integrates systematic data collection, the development of empirical and theoretical resilience curves, and the calculation of a Global Resilience Index. Unlike traditional methodologies, this study incorporates restoration funds as a weighting factor in resilience assessments, reflecting the cultural and historical importance of each structure. Additionally, the integration of data into a flexible digital platform enables real-time analysis and resilience planning, supporting informed decision-making for urban planning and resource allocation. These digital platforms significantly enhance the resilience assessment of cultural heritage by enabling the storage and processing of large datasets, thereby revolutionizing both academic research and operational practices. The findings highlight the potential of a data-driven framework to enhance the protection and conservation of heritage buildings in seismic-prone areas.

PDF

References

  1. [1] Hosseini S, Barker K, Ramirez-Marquez JE (2016) A review of definitions and measures of system resilience. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 145:47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
  2. [2] Bruneau M, Chang SE, Eguchi RT, et al (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra 19(4):733-752. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1623497
  3. [3] Bruneau M, Reinhorn AM (2007) Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities. Earthquake Spectra 28(1):41–62. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2431396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2431396
  4. [4] De Iuliis M, Cardoni A, Cimellaro GP (2024) Resilience and safety of civil engineering systems and communities: a bibliometric analysis for mapping the state-of-the-art. Safety science 174:106470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106470
  5. [5] Chang SE, Shinozuka M (2004) Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 20(3):739–55. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775796
  6. [6] Youn BD, Hu C, Wang P (2011) Resilience-driven system design of complex engineered systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 133(10). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4004981
  7. [7] Ayyub, BM (2014) Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk analysis 34(2):340-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12093
  8. [8] Franchin P, Cavalieri F (2015) Probabilistic assessment of civil infrastructure resilience to earthquakes. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30(7):583-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12092
  9. [9] Cimellaro GP, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience. Engineering structures 32(11):3639-3649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
  10. [10] Cimellaro G P, Reinhorn AM., Bruneau M (2010) Seismic resilience of a hospital system. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 6(1-2):127-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663847
  11. [11] Dueñas-Osorio L, Kwasinski A (2012) Quantification of lifeline system interdependencies after the 27 February 2010 Mw 8.8 offshore Maule, Chile, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 28(1_suppl1):581-603. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000054
  12. [12] Cimellaro GP, Solari D, Bruneau M (2014) Physical infrastructure interdependency and regional resilience index after the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake in Japan. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43(12):1763-1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2422
  13. [13] Cimellaro GP, Solari D (2014) Considerations about the optimal period range to evaluate the weight coefficient of coupled resilience index. Engineering structures 69:12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.003
  14. [14] Renschler CS, Frazier AE, Arendt LA, et al. (2010) Developing the ‘PEOPLES’ resilience framework for defining and measuring disaster resilience at the community scale. In: Proceedings of the 9th US national and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering (pp. 25-29). Canada Toronto.
  15. [15] Cimellaro GP, Renschler C, Reinhorn AM, Arendt L (2016) PEOPLES: a framework for evaluating resilience. Journal of Structural Engineering 142(10):04016063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514
  16. [16] Cantagallo C, Cianchino G, Sangiorgio V, Masciotta MG, Pierantozzi M, Lops C, Di Loreto S, Brando G, Spacone E. (2024) GENESIS: A Web-Based Platform for Managing the Seismic Risk of Historic Centres of Southern Italy. 10th Euro-American Congress on Construction Pathology, Rehabilitation Technology and Heritage Management REHABEND 2024, Gijón 7-10 May 2024, 2522-2530
  17. [17] Cantagallo C, Sangiorgio V (2024) An IT Tool for Managing Seismic Risk and Energy Performance of the Building Stock in Southern Italy. In International Conference of Ar. Tec. (Scientific Society of Architectural Engineering) Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland 103-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-71863-2_7
  18. [18] De Matteis G, Criber E, Brando G (2016) Damage probability matrices for three-nave masonry churches in Abruzzi after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10(2-3):120-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1113340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2015.1113340
  19. [19] DPCM (2011) Direttiva del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri 9 febbraio 2011. Valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale con riferimento alle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni di cui al D.M. 14/01/2008. Official Bulletin no. 47, 26/06/2011. Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 47 (Suppl. Ordinario n. 54) (in Italian)
  20. [20] USRA Ufficio Speciale per la Ricostruzione dell’Aquila. Ricostruzione dell’Aquila a seguito del sisma del 6 Aprile 2009. Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. Available at: www.usra.it. Accessed: November 2024.
  21. [21] Forcellini D (2021) The role of climate change in the assessment of the seismic resilience of infrastructures. Infrastructures 6(5):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6050076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6050076
  22. [22] Singhal TK, Kwon OS, Bentz EC., Christopoulos C (2021) Development of a civil infrastructure resilience assessment framework and its application to a nuclear power plant. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 18(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1832538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1832538
  23. [23] Shang Q, Wang T, Li J (2022) A quantitative framework to evaluate the seismic resilience of hospital systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 26(7):3364-3388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1802371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1802371
  24. [24] Carofilis Gallo WW, Clemett N, Gabbianelli G, O’Reilly G, Monteiro R (2022) Seismic resilience assessment in optimally integrated retrofitting of existing school buildings in Italy. Buildings 12(6):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060845
  25. [25] Hu B, Li S, Hou Z. Zhai C (2024) A practical method for functional recovery analysis based on seismic resilience assessment of city building portfolios. Journal of Building Engineering 95:110304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2024.105920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110304
  26. [26] Li P, Li X, Wang X, Wang D (2023) Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Frame Considering the Effect of Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences. Applied Sciences, 13(23):12620. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312620
  27. [27] Kafali C, Grigoriu M (2005) Rehabilitation decision analysis. In: ICOSSAR’05: proceedings of the ninth international conference on structural safety and reliability.