Vol. 16 No. 31 (2025): Gender in Youth Participation: Styles, Practices, Cultures
Articles

Gender Potential in Italian Youth Activism: The Intersectional Assimilation of Gender Cultures After the Pandemic

PDF
  • Lidia Lo Schiavo,
  • Paola Rebughini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-16659

Published 2025-08-08

Keywords

  • young people,
  • gender,
  • intersectionality,
  • care,
  • participatory practices

How to Cite

Lo Schiavo, L., & Rebughini, P. (2025). Gender Potential in Italian Youth Activism: The Intersectional Assimilation of Gender Cultures After the Pandemic. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 16(31), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-16659

Copyright (c) 2025 Lidia Lo Schiavo, Paola Rebughini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The article focuses on the intersection of youth and gender studies, analysing the complex relationships between gender and youth identity as experienced both in individual biographies, and within the context of participatory practices. Thus, the focus is on the legacy of feminisms in current mobilization practices. In the article, we refer to empirical material collected in Italy from 2017 to the present. What emerges from our empirical material is that the pandemic accelerated the inclusion of gender issues in many youth mobilizations and in local youth activism generally, by highlighting the themes of care, inclusion and sharing. The paper is based on 150 qualitative interviews, and a number of ethnographic moments conducted in several Italian towns between 2017 and 2024, and therefore includes a period spanning the pre-pandemic, pandemic and post-pandemic phases; however, for this article we will focus primarily on the interviews conducted immediately after the Covid emergency, which best highlight the assimilation of the gender culture of care in activism practices. Interviews were conducted with young women activists, but also with young men, including representatives from national student organisations. The empirical findings collected testify to the manifold nature of young people’s participatory practices, which range from climate issues to gender identity, from student claims to antiracism. In this article we focus on the relationship between gender identity and participatory practices based on mutual care.

PDF

References

  1. Ahmed S. (2017), Living a Feminist Life, NC: Duke University Press, Durham.
  2. Barca S. (2024), Forze di riproduzione. Per un’ecologia politica femminista, Edizioni Ambiente, Milano.
  3. Bell V. (2007), Culture & Performance. The Challenge of Ethics, Politics and Feminist Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  4. Bilge S. (2010), «Beyond subordination vs. resistance: An intersectional approach to the Agency of veiled muslim women», in Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31 (1): 9-28.
  5. Bilge S. and Denis A. (2010), «Intersectionality Undone: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies», in Du Bois Review, 10: 405-24.
  6. Braidotti R. (2013), The posthuman, Polity Press, London.
  7. Brown W. (2019), In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the West, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
  8. Butler J. (1993), Bodies that Matter: on the Discoursive Limits of Sex, Routledge, New York.
  9. Butler J. (2020), The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind, Verso, London.
  10. Chadwick R. (2024), «The question of feminist critique», in Feminist Theory, 25(3): 376-395
  11. Chatzidakis A., Hakim J., Littler J., Rottenberg C. and Segal L. (2020), «From carewashing to radical care: the discursive explosions of care during Covid-19», in Feminist Media Studies, 20(6): 889-895.
  12. Colombo E., Rebughini P. and Demirsu I. (2024), «Enchanted realism: Representations of self-fulfilment among Italian youth after the pandemic», in Current Sociology, https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921241289608
  13. de Lauretis T. (1991) «Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities. An Introduction», in Differences, 3, 2: iii-xviii.
  14. Della Porta D., Cini L. and Guzman-Concha C. (eds) (2020), The Contentious Politics of Higher Education. Student Movements in Late Neoliberalism, Routledge, New York-London.
  15. Fragnito M. and Tola M. (eds) (2021), Ecologie della cura. Prospettive transfemministe, Orthotes, Napoli.
  16. Guerzoni C., Nothdurfter U. and Trappolin L. (2024), Genitorialità queer in Italia. Filiazione, relazioni familiari, percorsi di legittimazione, Mondadori, Milano.
  17. Hancock A. M. (2016), Intersectionality: An Intellectual History, Oxford University Press, New York.
  18. Haraway D. (2018), «Staying with the trouble for multispecies environmental justice», in Dialogues in Human Geography, 8(1): 102-105.
  19. Harding S. (2008), Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, Duke University Press, Durham.
  20. hooks b. (1984), Feminist Theory. From Margin to Center, South end press, Boston.
  21. Istituto Toniolo (2019), Rapporto Giovani, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  22. IPSOS (2024), LGBT+ Pride Report https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2024-05/Pride%20Report%20FINAL_0.pdf
  23. Littler J. and Rottemberg C. (2021) «Feminist solidarities: Theoretical and practical Complexities», in Gender Work & Organization, 28: 864-877.
  24. Lo Schiavo L. (2023), Soggettività studentesca, Morlacchi, Perugia UP.
  25. Lo Schiavo L. and Rebughini P. (2023), «Youth Multidimensional Political Activism Between Singularisation and Mutualism: The Case of Up Network», in Cambio. Rivista sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 14 (27): 1-16.
  26. Lo Schiavo L. and Rebughini P. (2024), «Movimenti sociali giovanili», in E. Colombo e P. Rebughini (eds), Orientarsi nelle trasformazioni sociali. Le parole chiave, Carocci, Roma, pp. 141-156.
  27. Lugones M. (2010), «Toward a Decolonial Feminism», in Hypatia, 25(4): 742-759.
  28. Pickard S. and Bessant J. (eds) (2018), Young People Re-Generating Politics in Times of Crises, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  29. Pitti I. and Tuorto D. (2021), I giovani nella società contemporanea. Identità e trasformazioni, Carocci, Roma.
  30. Pitti I., Mengilli Y. and Walther A. (2021), «Liminal Participation: Young People’s Practices in the Public Sphere Between Exclusion, Claims of Belonging, and Democratic Innovation», in Youth & Society, 55(1): 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X211040848.
  31. Pulcini E. (2020), Tra cura e giustizia, Bollati Boringheri, Torino.
  32. Rebughini P. (2021), «Agency in intersectionality. Towards a method for studying the situatedness of action», in SOCIO, 15: 189-205.
  33. Rinaldi C., Cappotto C. and Bacio M. (2022), «Born to Be Different: LGBTQ2 Children of Heterosexual Families», in B.J. Gilley and G. Masullo (a cura di), Non-Binary Family Configurations: Intersections of Queerness and Homonormativity, Springer, Berlin, pp. 189-204.
  34. Spivak Gayatri C. (1999), A Critique of Post-Colonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
  35. Stati Genderali LGBTQIAP+&Disability (2023), https://statigenderali.com/ .
  36. Stulberg L. (2017), LGBTQ Social Movements, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  37. The Care Collective (2020), The Care Manifesto. The politics of interdependence, Verso, London.
  38. Tronto J. (2013), Caring Democracy, New York University Press, New York.
  39. Tronto J. (2023), Who Cares? Come ripensare una politica democratica, Castelvecchi, Roma.