Vol. 16 No. 32 (2025): Communities and possible worlds. Community experiences and practices of resistance in neoliberal rationality
Articles

Spaces of Resistance of Participatory Arts in Cultural Welfare Initiatives. Insight of Italian Case Studies

PDF
  • Giulia Allegrini,
  • Teresa Carlone
Giulia Allegrini
Dipartimento delle Arti, Università di Bologna, Italy
Bio
Teresa Carlone
Dipartimento delle Arti, Università di Bologna, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-16203

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • participation,
  • artistic practices,
  • neoliberalism,
  • Resistance,
  • cultural welfare

How to Cite

Allegrini, G., & Carlone, T. (2025). Spaces of Resistance of Participatory Arts in Cultural Welfare Initiatives. Insight of Italian Case Studies. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 16(32), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-16203

Copyright (c) 2025 Giulia Allegrini, Teresa Carlone

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article explores the many challenges that arise when artistic practices are evaluated through the lens of social impact. Such an approach compels artists to engage not only with aesthetic considerations but also with social, community-oriented, and participatory dimensions. We aim to contribute to the understanding of how artistic practices are shaped by the growing emphasis institutions place on generating social outcomes across various policy areas. This occurs within a broader transformation of welfare systems toward models of community welfare, rooted in participatory and collaborative principles. Within this emerging paradigm, the cultural sector is playing an increasingly vital role, as reflected in the concept of Cultural Welfare. The insights shared in this article stem from a systematic analysis of findings gathered through three research that explored how participatory artistic practices take shape within processes of significant social relevance. The results presented show that artistic practices can indeed generate meaningful social effects. However, it is challenging to reconcile artistic creation, which may not always be inherently tied to community engagement or specific social goals, with efforts to involve communities and ensure the sustainability of such practices. This tension gives rise to an ambivalent dynamic: on one hand, it is consciously navigated by artists and cultural organizations within the art system but on the other, it opens potential spaces for creative resistance.

PDF

References

  1. Allegrini G. (2025), «Le pratiche artistiche come spazio di cittadinanza e solidarietà: il ruolo politico degli “atti di cura” e delle emozioni», in AIS Journal of Sociology, Rubrica FOCUS, 3
  2. Allegrini G., Izci O., Paltrinieri R. (2025), «Significados sociales y efectos transformadores de las pràcticas artística» in BARATARIA Revista Castellano-Manchega de Ciencias Sociales, 36: 1-19.
  3. Allegrini G., Giannini L., Giuliani F. and Rinaldo Meschini E. (2025), «Una revisione critica della letteratura sul welfare culturale: semantiche emergenti e pratiche diffuse», Comunicazioni sociali. Under review.
  4. Allegrini G. (2020a), «Dispositivi di partecipazione e collaborazione tra retoriche neoliberiste e nuove forme di politicità», in Sociologia della comunicazione, 59: 140-163, https://doi.org/10.3280/SC2020-059008.
  5. Allegrini G. (2020b), «Artistic practice and the constitution of public sphere: an explorative inquiry», in R. Paltrinieri, P. Parmiggiani, P Musarò and M. Moralli (eds), Right to the City, Performing Arts and Migration, FrancoAngeli, Milano, pp. 124-141.
  6. Appadurai A. (2004), «The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition», in V. Rao and M: Walton (a cura di), Culture and Public Action, Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp. 59–84.
  7. Bauman Z. (2011), Modernità liquida, Laterza, Roma.
  8. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London.
  9. Belfiore E., Bennett O. (2007), «Rethinking the social impacts of the arts», in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13 (2): 135-151, https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701342741.
  10. Benasayag M., Del rey A. (2018), Elogio del conflitto, Feltrinelli, Roma.
  11. Bianchi I., Pera M., Calvet-Mir L., Villamayor S., Ferreri M., Reguero N. and Maestre Andrés S. (2022), «Urban commons and the local state: commons-led co-production, between enhancement and co-optation», in Territory, Politics and Governance, 12(9): 1333-1352, https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2108491.
  12. Bishop C. (2011), Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship, Verso, London-New York.
  13. Blaske S., Casella L., Rau M. and Staal L. (a cura di) (2020), The Art of Resistance. On Theatre, Activism and Solidarity, Verbrecher Verlag, Berlin.
  14. Bobbio L. (2003), Amministrare, governare, deliberare. Politiche pubbliche e democrazia deliberativa, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  15. Bourriaud N. (1998), Relational Aesthetics, Le presses du réel, Dijon.
  16. Butler J. (1999), Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of Identity, Routledge, London.
  17. Butler J. (2009), Soggetti del desiderio, Laterza, Roma.
  18. Caleo I. (2021), «Per istituzioni trans corporee: Note su queer commoning, lavoro improduttivo e politiche dell’interdipendenza», in M. Fragnito e M. Tola (a cura di), Ecologie della cura: Prospettive transfemministe, Orthotes, Salerno, pp. 143-168.
  19. Carpentier N. (2011), Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle, Intellect, Bristol.
  20. Carroll W. (2010), «Crisis, movements, counter-hegemony: in search of the new», in Interface: a Journal for and About Social Movements, 2(2): 168-198.
  21. Cicerchia A., Rossi Ghiglione A. and Seia C. (2020), Welfare Culturale, Treccani, www.treccani.it/magazine/atlante/cultura/Welfare
  22. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, ECORYS, Hammonds W. (2023), Culture and democracy, the evidence: how citizens’ participation in cultural activities enhances civic engagement, democracy and social cohesion: lessons from international research, Publications Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/10.2766/39199.
  23. Fancourt D. and Finn S. (‎2019),‎ What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.
  24. Festa D. (2016), «Les communs urbains. L’invention du commun», in Tracés. Revue de Sciences Humaines,
  25. 16: 233-256, https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.6636.
  26. Foucault M. (1991), «Governmentality», in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (a cura di), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, pp. 87-104.
  27. Geißel B. and Joas M. (2013), Participatory democratic innovations in Europe: Improving the quality of democracy?, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Leverkusen.
  28. Gemini L., D’Amico F.L. and Sansone V. (2021), «L’artivismo. Forme, esperienze, pratiche e teorie», in Connessioni remote, 2(2): 17-33.
  29. Gielen P. (2013), «Mapping Community Art», in Gielen P., De Bruyne P. (a cura di), Community Art. The Politics of Trespassing, Valiz, Amsterdam, pp. 15-33.
  30. Hadley S. (2021), Audience development and cultural policy, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  31. Hall S., Du Gay P. (a cura di) (1997), Questions of cultural identity, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
  32. Hall S. (a cura di) (1997), Representation. Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, Sage Publications Ltd., London.
  33. Hennink M., Bailey A. and Hutter I. (2010), Qualitative research methods, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks.
  34. Holden J. (2004), Capturing cultural value. How culture has become a tool of government policy, Demos, London.
  35. Isin E., and Nielson G. (2008), Act of citizenship, Zed Books, London.
  36. Kester G. (2005), «Conversation Pieces: The Role of Dialogue in Socially-Engaged Art», in Z. Kucor and S. Leung (a cura di), Contemporary Art Since 1985, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp. 76-100.
  37. Kindon S., Pain R. and Kesby M. (2010), Participatory Action Research. Approaches and Methods Connecting People, Participation and Place, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671.
  38. Locatelli S. (2022), «Sulle politiche culturali relative al “teatro sociale” in Italia: una proposta di sintesi e qualche perplessità», in Biblioteca teatrale: rivista semestrale di studi e ricerche sullo spettacolo, 138(2): 37-58
  39. Maino F. (2023), «Secondo welfare e cultura: innovazione e comunità per generare ben-essere», in Economia della Cultura, XXXIII (1): 53-59, https://doi.org/10.1446/112786.
  40. Manzoli G., Paltrinieri R. (a cura di) (2021), Welfare culturale. La dimensione della cultura nei processi di welfare di comunità, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  41. Matarasso F. (1997), Use or Ornament? The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts, Comedia, Glos.
  42. Milohnić A. (2005), «Artivism», in Maska, 20(1-2): 90-91.
  43. Moini G. (2012), Teoria critica della partecipazione. Un approccio sociologico, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  44. Morin E. and Kern A.B. (1993), Terre-patrie, Seuil, Paris
  45. Mouffe C. (2008), «Art and Democracy. Art as an Agonistic Intervention in Public Space», in Open, 14: 6-15.
  46. O’Neill M., Roberts B. (2019), Walking Methods. Research on the Move, Routledge, London.
  47. Oso L., Ribas-Mateos N. and Moralli M. (2025), Elgar Encyclopedia of Global Migration: New Mobilities and Artivism. Edward Elgar Publishing, London.
  48. Paltrinieri R. (2022), Il valore sociale della cultura, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  49. Ponzo I. (2014), Il welfare di comunità applicato alla cura, Conferenza Espanet, Torino.
  50. Priya A. (2021), «Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in its Application», in Sociological Bulletin, 70: 94-110.
  51. Rancière J. (2004), The Politics of Aesthetics. The Distribution of the Sensible, Continuum, New York-London.
  52. Riccioni I. (2018), «Art, Capitalist Markets, and Society. Insights and Reflections on Contemporary Art» in V.D. Alexander, S. Hägg, S. Häyrynen and E. Sevänen (ed.), Art and the Challenge of the Markets. From Commodification of Art to Artistic Critiques of Capitalism, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 99-115.
  53. Ruggiero L. and Graziano T. (2018), «Cultura bene comune? Strategie di resistenza e riappropriazione dal basso nella città creativa», in ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17(2): 292-324, https://doi.org/10.14288/acme.v17i2.1454.
  54. Salzbrunn M. (2019), «Artivisme», in Anthropen. Le dictionnaire francophone d’anthropologie ancré dans le contemporain, Éditions des Archives Contemporaines, Paris.
  55. Sorice M. (2021), Partecipazione disconnessa. Innovazione democratica e illusione digitale al tempo del neoliberismo, Carocci, Roma.
  56. Swyngedouw E. (2005), «Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State», in Urban Studies, 42(11): 1991-2006, https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869.
  57. Vannini E. (2021), «Ecofemminismi dal Sud Globale. Arte e immaginari contro-egemonici al tempo del capitalismo patriarcale», in Etnografie del contemporaneo. Donne, corpi, territori, 4: 83-90.
  58. Verde G. (2007), Artivismo tecnologico, Edizioni BFS, Pisa.
  59. Yin R.K. (2003), Case Study Research, Design and Methods; Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oak.