Vol. 16 No. 32 (2025): Communities and possible worlds. Community experiences and practices of resistance in neoliberal rationality
Articles

Gender-Sensitive Learning Communities: A Case Study

PDF
  • Gaia Antinelli,
  • Gaia Peruzzi
Gaia Antinelli
Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
Bio
Gaia Peruzzi
Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-16194

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • community,
  • gender gap,
  • organizational cultures,
  • third sector,
  • critical pedagogy

How to Cite

Antinelli, G., & Peruzzi, G. (2025). Gender-Sensitive Learning Communities: A Case Study. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 16(32), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-16194

Copyright (c) 2025 Gaia Antinelli, Gaia Peruzzi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article presents a case study of the course “The Third Sector Facing Gender Issues”, conducted between 2023 and 2025 as part of FQTS, a training project for leaders and volunteers in the Third Sector of Southern Italy. The course is analyzed as an experiment in a gender-sensitive learning community: an educational space involving both women and men, aimed at promoting a transformation of gender cultures within organizational cultures, power dynamics and society at large. The theoretical references include the concept of ‘community’ as interpreted by Bauman in relation to that of organization, and pedagogy as a tool for individual and social emancipation, as proposed by hooks. The study highlights how the course enabled the emergence of certain issues that participants – especially women – found difficult to address within their organizations. The investigation was carried out through two main actions: fostering public dialogues among participants during various in-person meetings across different cities, which were treated as a qualitative corpus and subjected to thematic analysis; and conducting interviews with key informants. This article focuses on the results of the first action, which brought to light the prejudices and silent resistances that oppose gender equality, as well as various elements useful for planning future training activities.

PDF

References

  1. Acker J. (1990), «Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations», in Gender & Society, 4(2): 139-158.
  2. Adam B. (2024), «Tempering the not-yet: Towards a social theory for the Anthropocene», in European Journal of Social Theory, 27(2): 191-208, https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310231221251.
  3. Antonucci M. C., Sorice M. and Volterrani A. (2024), «Liminalities: Social Vulnerabilities Between Participatory Processes and Digital Space in the Neoliberal Era», in SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 15(29): 163-177, https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15505.
  4. Bauman Z. (2000 [1999]), Thinking sociologically (2nd ed.), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
  5. Bourdieu P. (2001), Masculine domination, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  6. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006), «Using thematic analysis in psychology», in Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  7. Cavagnoli S. and Dragotto F. (2021), Sessismo, Mondadori, Milano.
  8. Connell R. W. (1995), Masculinities, University of California Press, Berkeley.
  9. Connell R. W. (2005), Masculinities (2nd ed.), University of California Press, Berkeley.
  10. Cotter D. A., Hermsen J. M., Ovadia S. and Vanneman R. (2001), «The glass ceiling effect», in Social Forces, 80(2): 655-681, https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0091.
  11. Eagly A. H. and Carli L. L. (2007), «Women and the labyrinth of leadership», in Harvard Business Review, 85(9): 62-71, https://doi.org/10.1037/e664062007-001.
  12. European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (2024), Gender Equality Index 2024: Sustaining Momentum on a Fragile Path, https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2024
  13. Fraser N. (2013), Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis, Verso, London.
  14. Guest G., MacQueen K. M. and Namey E. E. (2012), Applied Thematic Analysis, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
  15. Harding S. (1991), Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
  16. hooks b. (1994), Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom, Routledge, New York.
  17. ISTAT (2021), Censimento delle istituzioni non-profit, https://www.istat.it/statistiche-per-temi/censimenti/istituzioni-non-profit/
  18. Kimmel M. (2013), Angry white men: American masculinity at the end of an era, Nation Books, New York.
  19. Lave J. and Wenger E. (1991), Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  20. McRobbie A. (2009), The aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change, Sage, London.
  21. Peruzzi G., Bernardini V. and Lombardi R. (2022), «Gender issues for Italian young people: exploring gender identity and cultures in social autobiographies», in Journal of Youth Studies, 25(10): 1254-1272, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.2022107.
  22. Peruzzi G. and Lombardi R. (2018a), «Un nuovo attore nel sistema della formazione nazionale. Il Terzo Settore e l’esperienza del progetto Formazione Quadri del Terzo Settore del Sud Italia», in Scuola Democratica, 9(2): 335-356, https://doi.org/10.12828/90565.
  23. Peruzzi G. and Lombardi R. (2018b). «Education, Cultural Change, Territory: The Third Sector Innovation. An Italian Case Study», in Sociology Study, 8(7): 107-125, DOI:10.17265/2159-5526/2018.07.002
  24. Ridgeway C. L. (2009), «Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations», in Gender & Society, 23(2): 145-160, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208330313.
  25. Saldaña J. (2016), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Sage, London.
  26. Scarcelli C. M. and Selmi G. (2025), «Genere, sessualità e educazione. Note da un campo in movimento», in Scuola Democratica, (1): 7-26.
  27. van der Velden M. (2004), «From Communities of Practice to Communities of Resistance: Civil Society and Cognitive Justice», in Development, 47(1): 73-80, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100004.
  28. West C. and Zimmerman D. H. (1987), «Doing gender», in Gender & Society, 1(2): 125-151.
  29. World Bank (2024), World Bank Gender Strategy 2024–2030: Accelerate Gender Equality for a Sustainable, Resilient, and Inclusive Future, https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099013107142345483/secbos04cf7b650208a5e08b784c0db6a4
  30. World Economic Forum (2024), Global Gender Gap Report 2024, https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2024/