Vol. 16 No. 31 (2025): Gender in Youth Participation: Styles, Practices, Cultures
Articles

Feminism and LGBTQI+ Rights in Catholic Scout Youth Movement: Navigating among Identities

PDF
  • Rossella Ghigi,
  • Martina Rolandi,
  • Dario Tuorto
Rossella Ghigi
University of bologna
Bio
Martina Rolandi
University of Milan
Bio
Dario Tuorto
University of Bologna
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15711

Published 2025-08-08

Keywords

  • Scout movement,
  • Feminism,
  • Religiosity,
  • youth,
  • LGBTQI+

How to Cite

Ghigi, R., Rolandi, M., & Tuorto, D. (2025). Feminism and LGBTQI+ Rights in Catholic Scout Youth Movement: Navigating among Identities. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 16(31), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15711

Copyright (c) 2025 Rossella Ghigi, Martina Rolandi, Dario Tuorto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In this paper we examine the advancement of feminist and pro-LGBTQI+ ideals within the Italian Scout movement. This context provides a unique lens to test the interplay between traditional religious frameworks and progressive gender and sexuality discourses, particularly among youth, so contributing to the ongoing exploration of how spaces of youth participation are shaped by gender cultures, and how feminist and LGBTQI+ perspectives can coexist or challenge religious activism. We present data from an original study conducted on four hundreds of scout leaders during a national gathering. Our questionnaire investigates how feminist values and attitudes toward LGBTQI+ rights are embraced by the movement and how these views translate into a distancing from the highly binary rules of scouting and the willingness to change them. We then present a four categories typology of catholic young activists based on their attitudes toward feminism and LGBTQI+ and their religious participation. While girls are more open to addressing these topics, boys feel less comfortable challenging longstanding norms around gender segregation and sexuality. In other words, girls are more likely to show a Secularized or Devoted resistant profile than their male counterparts, who are more likely to be Traditionalist or Detached. Our multivariate models on the likelihood to embrace feminist and LGBTQI+ values emphasize the intersectional nature of factors influencing openness to feminism and LGBTQI+ rights, especially gender and age.

PDF

References

  1. Banaszak L. A., Liu S. J. S. and Tamer N. B. (2023), «Learning gender equality: How women’s protest influences youth gender attitudes», in Politics, Groups, and Identities, 11(1): 74-97, https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1926296.
  2. Banet-Weiser S. (2018), Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny, Duke University Press.
  3. Beck D., Habed A. J. and Henninger A. (Eds.) (2024), Blurring boundaries. ‘Anti-gender’ ideology meets feminist and LGBTIQI+ discourses, Verlag Barbara Budrich, Leverkusen.
  4. Beck U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  5. Beck U. and Beck-Gernsheim E. (2002), Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  6. Butler J. (2024), Who’s afraid of Gender?, Allen Lane, London.
  7. Caltabiano M. and Dalla Zuanna G. (2021), «The influence of Catholic education on gender roles in Italy», in Journal of Sociology of Religion, 48(2): 123-145.
  8. Dugan K. (2017), «Gendering prayer: Millennial-generation Catholics and the embodiment of feminine genius and authentic masculinity», in Religion and Gender, 7(1): 1-17.
  9. Darwin H. (2020), «Navigating the religious gender binary», in Sociology of Religion, 81(2): 185-200.
  10. Di Nicola G. (1993), «Aspetti e nodi problematici della pedagogia della coeducazione; quali specificità dell’educazione di ragazzi e ragazze», in A. Lucarelli e E. Patriarca (a cura di), Identità di genere e metodo scout: La coeducazione, AGESCI, Nuova Fiordaliso, Roma.
  11. Eurobarometer (2023), Discrimination in the EU in 2023, Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2972.
  12. Fasoli M. (1993), «Le trasformazioni socioculturali e loro incidenza sui modelli maschili e femminili», in A. Lucarelli e E. Patriarca (a cura di), Identità di genere e metodo scout: La coeducazione, AGESCI, Nuova Fiordaliso, Roma.
  13. Fraser N. (2020), Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis, Verso Books, London-New York.
  14. Frisinger S. M. (2022), «The commodification of feminism: Consequences and insight for the millennial generation of young women», in Creighton Law Review, 55(2): 193-226.
  15. Garbagnoli S. and Prearo M. (2018), La crociata anti-gender. Dal Vaticano alle manif pour tous, Kaplan, Torino.
  16. Giddens A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  17. Giorgi A. and Palmisano S. (2020), «The influence of religious movements on secular gender norms: A study of contemporary Catholicism», in Anthropology of Religion, 12(3): 345-367.
  18. Halls A., Uprichard E. and Jackson C. (2018), «Changing girlhoods–Changing girl guiding», in The Sociological Review, 66(1): 257-272.
  19. Halman L. and van Ingen E. (2015a), «Secularization and changing moral views: European trends in church attendance and views on homosexuality, divorce, abortion, and euthanasia», in European Sociological Review, 31: 616–627.
  20. Halman L. and van Ingen E. (2015b), «Religiosity and morality in Europe», in Journal of European Social Policy, 25(3): 310-323, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715583756.
  21. Howard C. (eds.) (2007), Contested individualization: Debates about contemporary personhood, Palgrave Macmillan US, New York.
  22. Inglehart R. and Norris P. (2003), Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  23. Kasselstrand I., Zuckerman P. and Cragun R. T. (2023), Beyond doubt: The secularization of society, NYU Press, New York.
  24. Kosar S. A., Muruthi B. A., Shivers C., Zarate J. and Byron J. (2023), «Millennials and Generation Z: Men’s perspectives on hashtag feminism», in Journal of Men’s Studies, 31(3): 478-499, https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265231175832.
  25. Kováts E. and Põim M. (2015), Gender as symbolic glue. The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe, Foundation for European Progressive Studies, Brussels.
  26. Kuhar R. and Paternotte D. (Eds.) (2017), Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham.
  27. Kuntz A. et al. (2015), «Human values, legal regulation, and approval of homosexuality in Europe: a cross-country comparison», in European Journal of Social Psychology, 45: 120-134.
  28. Lash S. (1993), «Reflexive modernization: The aesthetic dimension», in Theory, Culture and Society, 10(1): 1-23.
  29. Lavizzari A. (2016), Feminist movements and religious gender roles: Navigating tensions within Catholic institutions, PhD Thesis, University of Milan.
  30. Lundberg B. (2022), «Training cooperative citizens: masculinity and democratic citizenship in the Swedish Boy Scout Movement after 1945», in European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, 29(6): 907-929.
  31. Lyons J., Bauman C. and Kivisto P. (2017), Generational affluence: The new currency of culture, Routledge, New York.
  32. Mather D. M. (2018), «Gender attitudes in religious schools: A comparative study of religious and secular private schools in Guatemala», in Religions, 9(7): 219, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9070219.
  33. Massa R. (1993), «Identità di genere e metodo scout», in Lucarelli A. e Patriarca E. (a cura di), Identità di genere e metodo scout: La coeducazione, AGESCI, Nuova Fiordaliso, Roma.
  34. Mills S. (2016), «Scouting for girls? Gender and the Scout Movement in Britain», in Feminist Geopolitics, Routledge, pp. 131-150.
  35. Mori G., Alejandria Y. M., Quijano B., Salazar A. B. and Sanchez A. (2023), «Feminism through the lens of the Gen Z», in American Journal of Youth and Women Empowerment, 2(1): 8-16, https://doi.org/10.54536/ajywe.v2i1.1796.
  36. Palmisano S. and Pannofino N. (2021), Contemporary Spiritualities, Routledge, London.
  37. Pew Research Center (2019), In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at Rapid Pace, Retrieved from https://pewresearch.org.
  38. Prearo, M. (2024), Anti-gender mobilizations, religion and politics: An Italian case study. Routledge, New York.
  39. Price A. (2024), «Politics, Pop-culture, and Patriarchy: What does feminism mean for Gen Z?», in The Macksey Journal, 4(1): 1-23.
  40. Richardson D. (2017), «Rethinking Sexual Citizenship», in Sociology, 51(2): 208-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515609024
  41. Riley E. (2019), «Christian attitudes toward gender equality», in Religions, 10(2): 133, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020133.
  42. Romagnoli M., Sukaj E. and Carboni S. (2011), Attitudes on gender stereotypes and gender-based violence among youth: Country report - Italy, Casa delle Donne per non Subire Violenza.
  43. Rottenberg C. (2018), The Rise of Neoliberal Feminism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  44. Savage E. (2021), «Exploring young women’s attitudes towards the feminist movement and popular music artists’ claims to feminism», in Dearcadh: Graduate Journal of Gender, Globalisation and Rights, 2, https://doi.org/10.13025/bd40-nb37.
  45. Tilstra E., Magnuson D., Harper N. J. and Lepp A. (2022), «Gender and risk in outdoor adventure education», in Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25(2): 181-197.
  46. Vescovi R. (2016), «The development of the female scouting movement: Evidence of female emancipation in Italy», in Sport and the Emancipation of European Women, Routledge, pp. 57-69.
  47. Voas D. and Chaves M. (2016), «Is the United States a counterexample to the secularization thesis?», in American Journal of Sociology, 121(5): 1517-1556.
  48. Worthen M. G., Lingiardi V. and Caristo M. (2017), «Religion, sexuality, and mental health: The Catholic Church’s impact in the U.S., Spain, and Italy», in Journal of Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(2): 101-118.