Vol. 15 No. 30 (2024): Putting the Political in Its Place: Towards a Political Sociology of Sustainability
Articles

Sustainability Culture, Environmental Activism and Political Ideology Among Young Adults: A Survey on Students at the University of Ferrara

PDF
  • Viviana Asara,
  • Alfredo Alietti
Viviana Asara
Department of Humanities, University of Ferrara, Italy
Alfredo Alietti
Università di Ferrara, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15458

Published 2024-12-30

Keywords

  • environmental concern,
  • young adults,
  • environmental activism,
  • social movements,
  • political ideology

How to Cite

Asara, V., & Alietti, A. (2024). Sustainability Culture, Environmental Activism and Political Ideology Among Young Adults: A Survey on Students at the University of Ferrara. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 15(30), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15458

Copyright (c) 2024 Viviana Asara, Alfredo Alietti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The 2018/2019 climate mobilisation have vigorously questioned the consensus about the sustainability paradigm that has been hegemonic since the 1980, politicising the environmental issue in the public debate, and representing a ‘political epiphany’ for an entire generation. How has this movement influenced young people’s interest for environmental issues, what is the extent and type of their environmental concern, what are their cognitive interpretations of the ecological crisis and solutions to it, and how they relate to environmental mobilisations? This article aims to address these questions by means of a survey distributed to students at the University of Ferrara (1005 responses), relating these factors to political ideology. It finds that young adults are extremely concerned about the ecological crisis. A majoritarian belief can be discerned that structural solutions are deemed as required, such as prioritising environmental protection even at the cost of economic growth, transforming the mode of production and consumption, and reducing social inequalities. Furthermore, while climate sceptical positions are by far marginal, there is a widespread critical position towards the capability of science and technological innovation to tackle the climate crisis, and a sweeping belief of the necessity of individual lifestyle changes. With the notable exception of the latter two, all these beliefs are correlated with political ideology, showing the importance of political positioning vis-à-vis the environmental question. Finally, a broad feeling of hopelessness and ‘agencylessness’ towards the future can be discerned, with a low confidence about the transformative role of social movements vis-à-vis the ecological transition, which is however balanced by two fifth of students mobilising in environmental protest.

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Ajzen I. (1991), «The theory of planned behavior», in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 2: 179-211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  2. Ajzen I. and Fishbein M. (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  3. Arshad H.M., Saleem K., Shafi S., Ahmad T. and Kanwal S. (2020), «Environmental Awareness, Concern, Attitude and Behavior of University Students: A Comparison across Academic Disciplines», in Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30, 1 :561–70, https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/122617.
  4. Asara V., Otero I., Demaria F. and Corbera E. (2020) «Socially sustainable degrowth as a social-ecological transformation: repoliticizing sustainability», in Sustainability Science, 10, 3: 375-384, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0321-
  5. Besel R. D., Burke K., and Christos V (2015), «A Life History Approach to Perceptions of Global Climate Change Risk: Young Adults’ Experiences about Impacts, Causes, and Solutions», in Journal of Risk Research, 20, 1:61-75, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1017830.
  6. Blühdorn B. (2022), «Sustainability: Buying time for consumer capitalism», in L. Pellizzoni, E. Leonardi and V. Asara (eds), Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp. 141-155, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100673.00016
  7. Blühdorn I. and Deflorian M. (2021), «Politicisation beyond post-politics: new social activism and the reconfiguration of political discourse», in Social Movement Studies, 20 (3): 259-275, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1872375
  8. Boulianne S. and Ohme K. (2022), «Pathways to Environmental Activism in Four Countries: Social Media, Environmental Concern, and Political Efficacy», in Journal of Youth Studies, 25(6):771-92, https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.2011845.
  9. Bowman, B. and Pickard A. (2021), «Peace, Protest and Precarity: Making Conceptual Sense of Young People’s Non-Violent Dissent in a Period of Intersecting Crises», in Journal of Applied Youth Studies, 4(5): 493-510, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43151-021-00067-z.
  10. Brand U. (2016), «Transformation’ as a new critical orthodoxy: the strategic use of the term ‘transformation’ does not prevent multiple crises», in Gaia: Ecological Perspectives for Science and Societies, 25 (1): 23-7, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.7.
  11. Brand U. and Wissen M. (2012), «Crisis and continuity of capitalist society-nature relationships: The imperial mode of living and the limits to environmental governance», in Review of International Political Economy, 20, 4: 687-711, DOI:10.1080/09692290.2012.691077.
  12. Brunsting, S. and Postmes T. (2002), «Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age: Predicting Offline and Online Collective Action», in Small Group Research, 33,5: 525-554, DOI:10.1177 /104649602237169.
  13. Buttel F. H. and Flinn W. L. (1974), «The structure of support for the environmental movement, 1968-1970», in Rural Society, 39: 55-69.
  14. Buttel F. H. and Johnson D. E. (1977), «Dimensions of environmental concern: Factor structure, correlates, and implications for research», in Journal of Environmental Education, 9: 49-64, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1977.10801872.
  15. Calculli C., D’Uggento A.M., Labarile A. and Ribecco N. (2021), «Evaluating People’s Awareness about Climate Changes and Environmental Issues: A Case Study», in Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129244.
  16. Chancel L., Piketty T., Saex E. and Zucman G. (2022), World inequality report, World Inequality Lab, Paris.
  17. Chuvieco A., Burgui-Burgui M., Da Silva E.V., Hussein K. and Alkaabi. K. (2018), «Factors Affecting Environmental Sustainability Habits of University Students: Intercomparison Analysis in Three Countries (Spain, Brazil and UAE)», in Journal of Cleaner Production, 198:1372-1380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.121.
  18. Clements B. (2012), «Exploring Public Opinion on the Issue of Climate Change in Britain», in British Politics, 7(2):183–202, https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.1.
  19. Cruz S. M. (2017), «The Relationships of Political Ideology and Party Affiliation with Environmental Concern: A Meta-Analysis», in Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53:81-91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.010.
  20. D’Uggento A.M., Piscitelli A., Ribecco N. and Scepi G. (2023), «Perceived climate change risk and global green activism», in Statistical Methods & Applications, 32: 1167-1195, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-023-00681-6.
  21. Davidovic D., Harring N. and Jagers S. C. (2020), «The contingent effects of environmental concern and ideology: institutional context and people’s willingness to pay environmental taxes», in Environmental Politics, 29(4), 674-696, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882.
  22. De Moor J. (2018), «The ‘efficacy dilemma’ of transnational climate activism: the case of COP21», in Environmental Politics, 27 (6): 1079-1100, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1410315.
  23. De Moor J., Uba K., Wahlstrom M., Wennerhag M. and De Vydt M. (2020), «Protest for a future II: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays For Future climate protests on 20-27 September, 2019, in 19 cities around the world», in Open Society Foundations (OSF), https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ASRUW.
  24. Dunlap E. and Emmet Jones R. (2002), «Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues», in R. Dunlap and W. Michelson (eds), Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Greenwood Press, Westport CN, pp. 482-524.
  25. Dunlap R. E. and Van Liere K. D. (1978), «The “new environmental paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results» in Journal of Environmental Education, 9: 10-19, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875.
  26. Dunlap R. E., Xiao C. and McCright A. M. (2001), «Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism», in Environmental Politics, 10(4):23-48, https://doi.org/10.1080/714000580.
  27. Dunlap Riley E., Van Liere K.D., Mertig A.G. and Emmet Jones R. (2000), «Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale», in Journal of Social Issues, 56(3):425-42, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176.
  28. Feldman L., Hart P. S., Leiserowitz A., Maibach E. and Roser-Renouf C. (2017), «Do Hostile Media Perceptions Lead to Action? The Role of Hostile Media Perceptions, Political Efficacy, and Ideology in Predicting Climate Change Activism», in Communication Research, 44(8):1099-1124, https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214565914.
  29. Fielding K. S. and Head B. W. (2012), «Determinants of Young Australians’ Environmental Actions: The Role of Responsibility Attributions, Locus of Control, Knowledge and Attitudes», in Environmental Education Research, 18(2):171-86, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936.
  30. Fobissie E.N. (2019), «The role of environmental values and political ideology on public support for renewable energy policy in Ottawa, Canada», in Energy Policy, 134, 110918.
  31. Fritz L., Hansmann R., Dalimier B. and Binder C.R. (2023), «Perceived Impacts of the Fridays for Future Climate Movement on Environmental Concern and Behaviour in Switzerland», in Sustainability Science, 18(5):2219-2244, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01348-7.
  32. Gallagher M.F. and Cattelino J. (2020), «Youth, Climate Change and Visions of the Future in Miami», in Local Environment, 25(4):290-304, https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1744116.
  33. Goldman L. (2023), The principle of political hope. Progress, Action, and Democracy in Modern Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  34. Gómez-Baggethun E. and Naredo J.M. (2015), «In Search of Lost Time: The Rise and Fall of Limits to Growth in International Sustainability Policy», in Sustainability Science, 10(3):385-395, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0308-6.
  35. Haberl H., Virág D., Kalt G., Plank B., Brockway P., Fishman T., Hausknost D., Krausmann F., Leon-Gruchalski B., Mayer A., Pichler M., Schaffartzik A., Sousa T., Streeck J. and Creutzig F. (2020), «A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights», in Environmental Research Letters, 15(6):1-42, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a.
  36. Harris A., Wyn J. and Younes A. (2010), «Beyond Apathetic or Activist Youth: ‘Ordinary’ Young People and Contemporary Forms of Participation», in Young, 18(1):9-32, https://doi.org/10.1177/110330880901800103.
  37. Hickel J. and Kallis G. (2020), «Is Green Growth Possible? », in New Political Economy, 25(4): 469-486, https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964.
  38. Hickman C., Marks E., Pihkala P., Clayton S., Lewandowski E., Mayall E., Wray B., Mellor C and van Susteren L. (2021), «Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey», in The Lancet Planetary Health, 5 (12), e863 – e873.
  39. Howell S.E. and Laska S.B. (1992), «The changing face of the environmental coalition: A research note», in Environment and Behavior, 24: 134-144.
  40. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023) AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023, Retrievable here: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
  41. Kanagy C.L., Humphrey C.R. and Firebaugh G. (1994), «Surging Environmentalism: Changing Public Opinion or Changing Publics?», in Social Science Quarterly, 75, 804-819.
  42. Kyroglou G. and Henn M. (2022), «Pulled in and pushed out of politics: The impact of neoliberalism on young people’s differing political consumerist motivations in the UK and Greece» in International Political Science Review, 43(2): 279-294. DOI:10.1177/0192512120935521.
  43. Kollmuss A. and Agyeman J. (2002), «Mind the gap: Why do people behave environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour», in Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239-260.
  44. La Trobe H. L. and Acott T. G. (2000), «A modified NEP/DSP environmental attitudes scale», in The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(1): 12-20.
  45. LaLonde R. and Jackson E. L. (2002), «The new environmental paradigm scale: Has it outlived its usefulness?» in Journal of Environmental Education, 33(4): 28-36, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209599151.
  46. Liu X., Arnold V. and Liu S. (2014), «Examining the Determinants of Public Environmental Concern: Evidence from National Public Surveys», in Environmental Science and Policy, 39:77-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.006.
  47. Mazmanian D. and Sabatier P. (1981), «Liberalism, environmentalism, and partisanship in public policy-making: The California coastal commissions», in Environment and Behavior, 13: 361-384, https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916581133007.
  48. Mudaliar P., McElroy M. and Brenner J.C. (2022), «The Futility and Fatality of Incremental Action: Motivations and Barriers among Undergraduates for Environmental Action That Matters», in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 12(1):133-48, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00705-1.
  49. Nawrotzki N.J. (2012), «The Politics of Environmental Concern: A Cross-National Analysis», in Organization and Environment, 25(3):286-307, https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612456535.
  50. Oxfam (2022), Carbon billionaires: The investment emissions of the world’s richest people, Oxfam International, Oxford.
  51. Partridge E. (2008), «Views and Actions From Ambivalence to Activism», in Youth Studies Australia 27(2):18-26.
  52. Pellizzoni L., Leonardi E. and Asara V (2022), «Introduction: What is critical environmental politics», in L. Pellizzoni, E. Leonardi and V. Asara (eds), Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp. 1-21, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100673.00005.
  53. Post D. and Meng Y. (2018), «Does Schooling Foster Environmental Values and Action? A Cross-National Study of Priorities and Behaviors», in International Journal of Educational Development 60:10-18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.010.
  54. Rampedi I.T. and Ifegbesan A.P. (2022), «Understanding the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior among South Africans: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model» in Sustainability, 14(6): 3218, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063218.
  55. Suárez-Perales I., Valero-Gil J., Leyva-de la Hiz D, Rivera-Torres P. and Garcés-Ayerbe C. (2021), «Educating for the future: How higher education in environmental management affects pro-environmental behaviour», in Journal of Cleaner Production, 128972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128972.
  56. Swyngedouw E. (2022), «Climate change consensus. A depoliticized deadlock», in L. Pellizzoni, E. Leonardi and V. Asara (eds), Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp. 443-455, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100673.00042
  57. Thörn H. and Svenberg S. (2016), «We feel the responsibility that you shirk’: movement institutionalization, the politics of responsibility and the case of the Swedish environmental movement», in Social Movement Studies, 15 (6): 593-609, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1213162.
  58. Van Liere K.D. and Dunlap R.E. (1980), «The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence», in The Public Opinion Quarterly, 44 (2): 181-197.
  59. van Meer D., and Zografos C. (2024), «Take Your Responsibility’: The Politics of Green Sacrifice for Just Low-Carbon Transitions in Rural Portugal», in Sustainability Science, 19: 1313-1326, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-024-01519-0.
  60. Venghaus S., Henseleit M. and Belka M. (2022) «The impact of climate change awareness on behavioral changes in Germany: changing minds or changing behavior?», in Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12:8, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s 13705-022-00334-8.
  61. Scruggs L. and Benegal A. (2012), «Declining Public Concern about Climate Change: Can We Blame the Great Recession?», in Global Environmental Change, 22(2):505-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002.
  62. Suárez-Perales I., Valero-Gil J. Leyva-de la Hiz D.I., Rivera-Torres P. and Garcés-Ayerbe C. (2021), «Educating for the Future: How Higher Education in Environmental Management Affects pro-Environmental Behaviour», in Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128972.
  63. Taniguchi H. and Aldikacti Marshall G. (2018), «Trust, Political Orientation, and Environmental Behavior», in Environmental Politics, 27(3):385-410, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1425275.
  64. Telesiene A. and Hadler M. (2023), «Dynamics and Landscape of Academic Discourse on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors since the 1970s», in Frontiers in Sociology, 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1136972.
  65. Tezel E., Ugural M. and Giritli H. (2018), «Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Students: Influence of Cultural Differences», in European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4):43-52, https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n4p43.
  66. Thörn H. and Svenberg A. (2016), «We Feel the Responsibility That You Shirk’: Movement Institutionalization, the Politics of Responsibility and the Case of the Swedish Environmental Movement», in Social Movement Studies, 15(6):593-609, https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1213162.
  67. Valdez R.X., Peterson M. N. and Stevenson K. T. (2018), «How Communication with Teachers, Family and Friends Contributes to Predicting Climate Change Behaviour among Adolescents», in Environmental Conservation, 45(2):183-91, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000443.
  68. Wahlström M., Kocyba P., De Vydt M. and de Moor J. (2019) (eds), Protest for a future: Composition, mobilization and motives of the participants in Fridays For Future climate protests on 15 March, 2019 in 13 European cities, Retrieved from: https://osf.io/xcnzh/
  69. Wiedenhofer D., Virág D., Kalt G., Plank B., Streeck J., Pichler M., Mayer A., Krausmann F., Brockway P., Schaffartzik A., Fishman T., Hausknost D., Leon-Gruchalski B., Sousa T., Creutzig F. and Haberl H. (2020), «A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: Bibliometric and conceptual mapping», in Environmental Research Letters, 15(6): pp. 1-32.