Vol. 15 No. 30 (2024): Putting the Political in Its Place: Towards a Political Sociology of Sustainability
Articles

Urban Sustainability and the Local Politics of Digital Twins: the Cases of Bologna and Milan

PDF
  • Ernesto d'Albergo,
  • Giorgio Giovanelli
Ernesto d'Albergo
Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
Bio
Giorgio Giovanelli
Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15407

Published 2024-12-30

Keywords

  • urban sustainability,
  • digital twins,
  • urban policies,
  • urban governance

How to Cite

d’Albergo, E., & Giovanelli, G. (2024). Urban Sustainability and the Local Politics of Digital Twins: the Cases of Bologna and Milan. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 15(30), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15407

Copyright (c) 2024 Ernesto d'Albergo, Giorgio Giovanelli

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

To address the complexity of sustainable urban development, policymakers are making increasing use of digital technology tools, now including AI and urban digital twins (UDTs). The aims of the article are to shed light on the political implications of UDTs uses in urban policy and governance aimed at sustainability and to understand from a perspective of political sociology factors influencing processes of UDTs design and implementation. Research questions regard the local politics of UDTs for sustainability analyzed through the lenses of policy frames, contexts, regulation and data governance and value. Responses are based on evidence from the comparative analysis of two case studies: Bologna and Milan, carried out through desk and field research (analysis of documents and interviews). Local agencies lead to different approaches and, potentially, outcomes, made possible by the diversity and plasticity of UDT models, systems and purposes, as well as by the elasticity and adaptability to different spatial contexts of the policy paradigm of urban sustainability. Two patterns of the local politics of UDTs emerge in Bologna and Milan, in which above all the roles of public actors and businesses are different. Logics of action, practices and forms of coordination are transferred from the broader systems of urban governance and political economy to the more circumscribed systems of action of UDTs.

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Allam Z. and Jones D.S., (2021), «Future (post-COVID) digital, smart and sustainable cities in the wake of 6G: Digital twins, immersive realities and new urban economies», in Land Use policy, 101, 105201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105201.
  2. Al-Sehrawy R., Kumar B. and Watson R. (2023), «The pluralism of digital twins for urban management: Bridging theory and practice», in Journal of Urban Management, 12: 16-32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.01.002.
  3. Alva P., Biljecki F. and Stouffs R. (2022), «Use cases for District-scale urban digital twins», in The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48: 5-12, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-4-w4-2022-5-2022.
  4. Andreotti A. and Le Galès P. (2019), «Introduzione. Governare Milano nel nuovo millennio», in A. Andreotti (a cura di), Governare Milano nel nuovo millennio, Il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 7-41.
  5. Barresi A. (2023), «Urban Digital Twin e pianificazione urbana per la città sostenibile», in TECHNE: Journal of Technology for Architecture & Environment, 25: 78-83, https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-13568.
  6. Batty M. (2018), «Digital twins», in Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5): 817-820, https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318796416.
  7. CABB (Centre for Digital Built Britain) (2019), «The local governance of digital technology – Implications for the city-scale digital twin», in Final reporting of the 208/19 ECR Project, 10 July 2019.
  8. Callcut M., Cerceau Agliozzo J.P., Varga L. and McMillan L. (2021), «Digital Twins in Civil Infrastructure Systems», in Sustainability, 13, 20: 11549, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011549.
  9. Caprari G., Castelli G., Montuori M., Camardelli M. and Malvezzi R. (2022), «Digital Twin for Urban Planning in the Green Deal Era: A State of the Art and Future Perspectives», in Sustainability, 14(10): 6263, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106263.
  10. Charitonidou M. (2022), «Urban scale digital twins in data-driven society: Challenging digital universalism in urban planning decision-making», in International Journal of Architectural Computing, 20(2): 238-253, https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771211070005.
  11. Comune di Bologna (2022), La Grande Bologna. Per non lasciare indietro nessuno, https://www.comune.bologna.it/myportal/C_A944/api/content/download?id=61f9071e2b5fbe009a5eba5d
  12. Comune di Bologna (2023), Bologna Gemello Digitale, https://www.comune.bologna.it/myportal/C_A944/api/content/download?id=65096dceb867430099f9438e
  13. Cordella A. and Paletti A. (2019), «Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case», in Government Information Quarterly, 36, 4: 101049, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409.
  14. Cugurullo F. (2021), Frankenstein Urbanism: Eco, Smart and Autonomous Cities, Artificial Intelligence and the End of the City, Routledge, London.
  15. Cugurullo F. Caprotti F., Cook M., Karvonen A., McGuirk P. and Marvin S. (2024), «The rise of AI urbanism inpost-smart cities: A critical commentary on urban artificial intelligence», in Urban Studies, 61(6): 1168–1182, https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231203386.
  16. d’Albergo E., Fasciani T., Giovanelli G. and Rossi. F. (2022), «Governance e metagovernance delle economie urbane: Roma e Milano di fronte alla crisi pandemica», in C. Perrone, A. Magnier e M. Morisi (a cura di), Settimo Rapporto sulle città. Chi possiede la città? Proprietà, poteri, politiche, il Mulino, Bologna, pp. 231-243.
  17. Deng T., Zhang K. and Zuo-Jun S. (2021), «A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities», in Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 6: 125-134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003.
  18. Deren L., Wenbo Y. and Zhenfeng S. (2021), «Smart city based on digital twins», in Computational Urban Science, 1, 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-021-00005-y.
  19. DG Connect (2023), Mapping EU-based LDT providers and users, European Commission, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7892c228-359f-11ee-800c-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
  20. Ferré-Bigorra J., Casals M. and Gangolells M. (2022), «The adoption of urban digital twins», in Cities, 131, 103905, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103905.
  21. Fideli R. (1998), La comparazione, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  22. Flowers M. (2013), «Beyond open data: The data-driven city», in B. Goldstein and L. Dyson (eds), Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation, pp. 185-198.
  23. Glaser B.G. (2021), The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
  24. González S., Oosterlynck S., Ribera-Fumaz R. and Rossi U. (2018), «Locating the global financial crisis: variegated neoliberalization in four European cities», in Territory, Politics, Governance, 6,4: 468-488, https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1318713.
  25. Greener I. (2005), «The potential of path dependence in political studies», in Politics, 25(1): 62-72, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00230.x.
  26. Hall P.A. and Taylor R.C. (1996), «Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms», in Political Studies, 44, 4: 936-957, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
  27. Hämäläinen M. (2021), «Urban development with dynamic digital twins in Helsinki city», in IET Smart Cities, 3(4): 201-210, https://doi.org/10.1049/smc2.12015.
  28. König P.D. (2021), «Citizen-centered data governance in the smart city: From ethics to accountability», in Sustainable Cities and Society, 75, 103308, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103308.
  29. Kuziemski M. and Misuraca G. (2020), «AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings», in Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976.
  30. Lanzalaco L. and Prontera A. (2012), Politiche pubbliche comparate, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  31. March J.G. and Olsen J.P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics, Free Press, New York.
  32. Marcucci E., Gatta V., Le Pira M., Hansson L. and Bråthen S. (2020), «Digital twins: A critical discussion on their potential for supporting policy-making and planning in urban logistics», in Sustainability, 12(24): 10623, https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410623.
  33. Massari M. and Orioli V. (2023), Praticare l’urbanistica: traiettorie tra innovazione sociale e pianificazione, Franco Angeli, Milano.
  34. Morlino L. (2005), Introduzione alla ricerca comparata, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  35. Muench S., Stoermer E., Jensen K., Asikainen T., Salvi M. and Scapolo F. (2022), «Towards a green and digital future», EUR 31075 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2022, https://doi.org/10. 977331.
  36. Natalini A. (2023), «La Grounded Theory come processo iterativo e comparativo tra principi e caratteristiche: Una prospettiva interpretativa», in Formazione & insegnamento, 21(2): 12-21, https://doi.org/10.7346/-fei-XXI-02-23_03.
  37. Nativi S., Mazzetti P. and Craglia M. (2021), «Digital ecosystems for developing digital twins of the earth: The destination earth case», in Remote Sensing, 13(11), 2119, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112119.
  38. Nochta T., Badstuber N. and Wahby N. (2019), On the governance of City Digital Twins. Insights from the Cambridge case study, Cabb (Centre for the Digital Built Britain), https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/1695f8c2-9eb5-47c0-9773-8c937d42d3c0/content
  39. Nochta T., Wan L., Schooling J.M., and Parlikad A. K. (2021), «A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: The case of city-scale digital twins», in Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1-2): 263-287, https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1798177.
  40. Papyshev G. and Yarime M. (2021), «Exploring city digital twins as policy tools: A task-based approach to generating synthetic data on urban mobility», in Data & Policy, 3, e16, https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.17.
  41. Pierson P. (2000), «Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics», in American political science review, 94(2): 251-267, https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.
  42. Rein M., and Schön D. (1993), «Reframing Policy Discourse», in F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds.), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Duke University Press, London, pp. 145-166.
  43. Schmidt V.A. (2008), «Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse», in Annual. Reviews of Political Science, 11: 303-326, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
  44. Schmidt V.A. (2010), «Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’», in European political science review, 2(1): 1-25, https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X.
  45. Strati A. (1997), «La grounded theory», in L. Ricolfi (a cura di), La ricerca qualitativa, La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Roma, pp. 125-64.
  46. Suffia G. (2022), «Legal issues of the digital twin cities in the current and upcoming European legislation: Can digital twin cities be used to respond to urbanisation problems?», in ICEGOV ‘22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, October, pp. 534-537.
  47. Verhulst S. and Sloane M. (2020), «Realizing the potential of AI localism», in Project Syndicate, 7, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/local-regulation-of-artificial-intelligence-uses-by-stefaan-g-verhulst-1-and-mona-sloane-2020-02
  48. Weil C., Bibri S. E., Longchamp R., Golay F. and Alahi A. (2023), «Urban digital twin challenges: A systematic review and perspectives for sustainable smart cities», in Sustainable Cities and Society, 99, 104862, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104862.
  49. World Economic Forum (2022), «The Global Lighthouse Network Playbook for Responsible Industry Transformation», https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Lighthouse_Network_Playbook_for_Responsible_Industry_Transformation_2022.pdfv
  50. Yang S. and Kim H. (2021), «Urban digital twins as a virtual platform for smart city», in International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 12(4): 363-379, https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20210030.
  51. Ye X., Du J., Han Y., Newman G., Retchless D., Zou L., Ham Y. and Cai Z. (2023), «Developing Human-Centered Urban Digital Twins for Community Infrastructure Resilience: A Research Agenda», in Journal of Planning Literature, 38(2): 187-199, https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221137861.