Vol. 15 No. 30 (2024): Putting the Political in Its Place: Towards a Political Sociology of Sustainability
Articles

Laying Stress on Ideas: Actors, Connections, and Meanings of Sustainable Finance in Italy

PDF
  • Tiziana Nupieri
Tiziana Nupieri
Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15351

Published 2024-12-30

Keywords

  • sustainable finance,
  • financialization of sustainability,
  • interpretive approach,
  • référentiel

How to Cite

Nupieri, T. (2024). Laying Stress on Ideas: Actors, Connections, and Meanings of Sustainable Finance in Italy. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 15(30), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15351

Copyright (c) 2024 Tiziana Nupieri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Although the idea of private investment as “essential for sustainability” has only recently been naturalized in European regulations (Hay 2004), the use of market instruments to address social-environmental challenges has long been established in Western societies. Since the “neoliberal revolution” of the late 1970s (Harvey 2005: 39), new modes of accumulation and regulatory processes have fostered the expansion of financial assets, a process known as financialization (Epstein 2005, Krippner 2005). Over the past 15 years, financial logic has permeated areas such as welfare, nature, and the environment. However, the literature still lacks a holistic analysis of the pervasive role of finance across all dimensions of sustainability, particularly in terms of “financialization of sustainability”. Social and economic actors play a pivotal role in constructing narratives that frame sustainability through market logic. Drawing on the référentiel approach (Jobert and Muller 1987), this paper explores sustainable finance discourses in Italy using a mixed-methods approach. It investigates the key actors disseminating information on the topic, the resources that position them as mediators, and the worldviews they embed in both discourse and policy.

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Aitken R. (2007), Performing capital: Toward a cultural economy of popular and global finance, Springer.
  2. Aglietta M. and Breton R. (2001), «Financial systems, corporate control and capital accumulation», in Economy and Society, 30(4): 433-466.
  3. Arjaliès D. L. and Bansal P. (2018), «Beyond numbers: How investment managers accommodate societal issues in financial decisions», in Organization Studies, 39(5-6): 691-719.
  4. Azhgaliyeva D. and Liddle B. (2020), «Introduction to the special issue: Scaling Up Green Finance in Asia», in Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 10(2): 83-91, https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1736491
  5. Belotti E. and Caselli D. (2016), «La finanziarizzazione del welfare: una esplorazione del caso italiano», in Rivista online di Urban@it, 2: 1-14.
  6. Benegiamo M. (2021), «Exploring accumulation in the New Green Revolution for Africa. Ecological crisis, agrarian development, and bio-capitalism», in M. Benquet and T. Bourgeron (a cura di), Accumulating Capital Today: Contemporary Strategies of Profit and Dispossessive Policies, Routledge, pp. 42-59.
  7. Boyer R. (2000), «Is a finance-led growth regime a viable alternative to Fordism? A preliminary analysis», in Economy and society, 29(1): 111-145.
  8. Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. and Freeman L. C. (2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis Harvard, MA.
  9. Bulsei G. (2017), «La scienza utile. Expertise e partecipazione nelle decisioni pubbliche», in Biblioteca della libertà, LII (219): 1-19.
  10. Caselli D. (2020), Esperti. Come studiarli e perché, il Mulino, Bologna.
  11. Chiapello E. (2013), «Capitalism and its criticism», In P. Du Gay and G. Morgan (Eds.), New spirits of capitalism? Crisis, justifications, and dynamics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 60-81.
  12. Chiapello E. (2015), «Financialisation of valuation», in Human Studies, 38(1): 13-35.
  13. Chiapello E. and Knoll L. (2020), «Social finance and impact investing. Governing welfare in the era of financialization», in Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 45(3): 7-30.
  14. Clapp J. and Isakson S. R. (Eds.) (2018), Speculative harvests: Financialization, food, and agriculture, Fernwood Publishing.
  15. Collins H. M. and Evans R. (2002), «The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience», in Social Studies of Science, 32(2): 235-296.
  16. Crouch C. (2009), «Privatised Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime», in The British journal of politics and international relations, 11(3): 382-399.
  17. Cuckston T. (2018), «Creating financial value for tropical forests by disentangling people from nature», in Accounting Forum, 42(3): 219-234.
  18. Dal Maso G. (2023), «Chinese financialization with ‘green’ characteristics. Retail investors and the state planning of green assets», in Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 16(1): 41-62.
  19. Dagnes J. (2018), «Finanza e vita quotidiana: la finanziarizzazione delle famiglie italiane», in Quaderni di Sociologia, (76): 35-56.
  20. De Felice R. (2017), «Impact Investing: un movimento globale», in Forum per la finanza sostenibile, Impact Investing: la finanza a supporto dell’impatto socio-ambientale.
  21. Del Giudice A. (2019), La finanza sostenibile: Strategie, mercato e investitori istituzionali, Giappichelli Editore, Torino.
  22. Dimmelmeier A. (2021), «Sustainable finance as a contested concept: Tracing the evolution of five frames between 1998 and 2018», in Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 0(0): 1-24.
  23. Eccles N. (2013), «Sustainable investment, Dickens, Malthus, and Marx», in Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(4): 287-302.
  24. Engelen E. (2008), «The case for financialization», in Competition & Change, 12(2): 111-119.
  25. Epstein G. A. (2005), Financialization and the World Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  26. European Commission (2016), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions “European action for sustainability”, COM (2016) 0739 final.
  27. European Commission (2016b), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency, COM (2016) 761 final.
  28. European Commission (2018), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions “Action Plan on Financing Sustainable Growth”, COM (2018) 097 final.
  29. Eurosif (2018), EUROPEAN SRI STUDY 2018, https://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/European-SRI-2018-Study.pdf
  30. Flinders M. and Buller J. (2006), «Depoliticisation: Principles, Tactics, and Tools», in British Politics, 1(3): 293-318.
  31. Gramsci A. (1975), Quaderni dal carcere (volume 1-5: 1929-1932), Einaudi, Torino.
  32. Haigh M. (2012), «Publishing and defining sustainable finance and investment», in Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2(2): 88-94.
  33. Hall P. A. (1993), «Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain», in Comparative Politics, 25(3): 275-296.
  34. Harvey D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  35. Hay C. (2011), «Ideas and the Construction of Interests», in D. Béland and R. H. Cox (a cura di), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 65-82.
  36. Jabareen Y. (2008), «A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development», in Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 10(2): 179-192, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
  37. Jobert B. Y. and Muller P. (1987), L’Etat en action: politiques publiques et corporatismes, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
  38. Kingdon J. K. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Little Brown and Co., Boston.
  39. Kotz D. M. (2008), «Neoliberalism and financialization», in a paper written for the conference in honour of Jane D’arista at the Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, May (pp. 2-3).
  40. Krippner G. R. (2005), «The financialization of the American economy», in Socio-economic Review, 3(2): 173-208.
  41. Kuhn B. M. (2022), «Sustainable finance in Germany: Mapping discourses, stakeholders, and policy initiatives», in Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(2): 497-524.
  42. Maasen S. and Weingart P. (2005), «What’s New In Scientific Advice To Politics? », in S. Maasen, P. Weingart (a cura di), Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 121-136.
  43. Mader P., Mertens D. and van der Zwan N. (Eds.) (2020), The Routledge International Handbook of Financialization, (1st ed.), Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142876
  44. Małgorzata J., Pieloch-Babiarz A. and Sajnóg A. (2020), «Does short-termism influence the market value of companies? Evidence from EU countries», in Journal of Risk Financial Management, 13(11): 272.
  45. Marazzi C. (2009), «La violenza del capitalismo finanziario», in A. Fumagalli and S. Mezzadra (a cura di), Crisi dell’economia globale. Mercati finanziari, lotte sociali e nuovi scenari politici, Ombre Corte, Verona, pp. 15-36.
  46. Mazzucato M. and Collington R. (2023), The Big Con: How the Consulting Industry Weakens Our Businesses, Infantilizes Our Governments, and Warps Our Economies, Penguin, New York.
  47. Meyer M. (2010), «The Rise of the Knowledge Broker», in Science Communication, 32(1): 118-127.
  48. Migliorelli M. (2021), «What Do We Mean by Sustainable Finance? Assessing Existing Frameworks and Policy Risks», in Sustainability, 13(2): 1-17.
  49. Moini G. (2012), Teoria critica della partecipazione. Un approccio sociologico, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  50. Muller P. (2000), «L’analyse cognitive des politiques publiques: vers une sociologie politique de l’action publique», in Revue Française de Science Politique, 50(2): 189-207.
  51. Muller P. (2003), Les politiques publiques (5ème ed.), Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
  52. Muller P. and Surel Y. (1998), L’analyse des politiques publiques, Montchrestien, Paris.
  53. Ouma S., Johnson L. and Bigger P. (2018), «Rethinking the financialization of ‘nature’», in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(3): 500-511.
  54. Pasi G. (2016), Modelli di risposta ai nuovi bisogni sociale e possibili scenari di riforma, Social Impact Agenda per l’Italia.
  55. Peck J. and Tickell A. (2002), «Neoliberalizing space», in Antipode, 34(3): 380-404.
  56. Pellizzoni L. (2023), Cavalcare l’ingorvernabile. Natura, neoliberalismo e nuovi materialismi, Orthotes, Napoli-Salerno.
  57. Pielke Jr R. A. (2007), The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  58. Reffay C. and Chanier T. (2002), «Social Network Analysis Used for Modelling Collaboration in Distance Learning Groups», in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 2363: 31-40.
  59. Rein M. and Schön D. (1993), «Reframing policy discourse», in The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, 6(2): 145-166.
  60. Sabatier P. A. (1988), «An advocacy coalition framework of the policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein», in Policy Sciences, 21(2): 129-168.
  61. Spash C. L. and Smith T. (2022), «The values of Nature», in Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 318-331.
  62. United Nation (2015), Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/9814.
  63. Van der Zwan N. (2014), «Making sense of financialization«, in Socio-economic review, 12(1): 99-129.
  64. Viganò F. (2023), «The Climate Financialization Trap: Claiming for Public Action», in Sustainability, 15(6): 48-41.
  65. Weaver R. K. (1989), «The changing world of think tanks», in Political Science & Politics, 22(3): 563-578.
  66. Zittoun P. and Demongeot B. (2010), «Debates in French policy studies: from cognitive to discursive approaches», in Critical Policy Studies, 3(3-4): 391-406.