Vol. 15 No. 30 (2024): Putting the Political in Its Place: Towards a Political Sociology of Sustainability
Articles

Repoliticizing Green Spaces in Urban Transitions. The Relevance of Governance for Equitable Ecological Planning

PDF
  • Bianca Galmarini,
  • Leonardo Chiesi
Bianca Galmarini
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
Leonardo Chiesi
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15342

Published 2024-12-30

Keywords

  • green governance,
  • urban green spaces,
  • urban ecological transition,
  • green gentrification

How to Cite

Galmarini, B., & Chiesi, L. (2024). Repoliticizing Green Spaces in Urban Transitions. The Relevance of Governance for Equitable Ecological Planning. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 15(30), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15342

Copyright (c) 2024 Bianca Galmarini, Leonardo Chiesi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In the pursuit of ecological transitions, city administrations emerge as key players in implementing global strategies. Urban ecological planning responds to several major objectives outlined in global sustainable agendas, and urban experimentation is considered an ideal arena for developing and testing models of renaturalization. However, this greening momentum is also serving as a means to depoliticize planning processes and city governance. Despite ambitious claims, ecological plans are frequently burdened by a fragmented approach, and a lack of structural imbalance and equity-focused provisions. The political significance of ecological planning and management is typically disregarded, with dissent and socio-economic impacts of greening on the population sidelined in favor of emphasizing social green benefits. Conveying a consensual and a-critical view of urban greening as a ‘pure good’ producing widespread benefits for all, and framing social benefits as a consequence of increased environmental quality sustainable planning often results in overlooking the possible unfair outcomes of greening-led urban regeneration. Moreover, emphasizing the urgency for adaptation measures, and celebrating measurable outcomes, ecological planning is embracing a technocentric approach to public space, whereby environmental issues are used to legitimize policies that are exclusionary. Fragmentation of ecological planning and governance, with the involvement of private actors or nonprofits in greening processes, may contribute to the decoupling of social and environmental claims, serving city marketing rather than citizens’ well-being and social cohesion, and may result in the privatization and commodification of nature. By drawing on the analysis of green management experiences, this paper analyzes the need for a political sociology perspective in understanding and re-politicizing the governance of green spaces.

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Angelo H., MacFarlane K., Sirigotis J. and A. Millard-Ball (2022), «Missing the Housing for the Trees: Equity in Urban Climate Planning», in Journal of Planning Education and Research 0 (0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211072527.
  2. Angelo H. (2021), How green became good: Urbanized nature and the making of cities and citizens, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  3. Angelo H. and Wachsmuth D. (2020), «Why does everyone think cities can save the planet?», in Urban Studies 57 (11): 2201–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020919081.
  4. Anguelovski I. (2023), «(In)Justice in Urban Greening and Green Gentrification», in S. Villamayor-Tomas and R. Muradian (eds), The Barcelona School of Ecological Economics and Political Ecology (Vol. 8, Springer International Publishing, pp. 235–247, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22566-6_20.
  5. Anguelovski I., Connolly J.J.T., Garcia-Lamarca M., Cole H. and Pearsall H. (2019), «New Scholarly Pathways on Green Gentrification: What Does the Urban ‘Green Turn’ Mean and Where Is It Going?» in Progress in Human Geography 43 (6): 1064–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518803799.
  6. Anguelovski I., Connolly J. J. T., Cole H., Garcia-Lamarca M., Triguero-Mas M., Baró F., Martin N., Conesa D., Shokry G., del Pulgar C. P., Ramos L. A., Matheney A., Gallez E., Oscilowicz E., Máñez J. L., Sarzo B., Beltrán M. A. and Minaya J. M. (2022), «Green gentrification in European and North American cities» in Nature Communications, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1
  7. Anguelovski I., Irazábal-Zurita C. and Connolly J. J. T. (2019), «Grabbed Urban Landscapes: Socio-Spatial Tensions in Green Infrastructure Planning in Medellín», in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43 (1): 133–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12725.
  8. Anguelovski I., Brand A. L., Connolly J. J. T., Corbera E., Kotsila P., Steil J., Garcia-Lamarca M., Triguero-Mas M., Cole H., Baró F., Langemeyer J., del Pulgar C. P., Shokry G., Sekulova F. and Argüelles Ramos L. (2020), «Expanding the Boundaries of Justice in Urban Greening Scholarship: Toward an Emancipatory, Antisubordination, Intersectional, and Relational Approach», in Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110 (6): 1743–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579.
  9. Anguelovski I., Connolly J. and Brand A. L. (2018), «From Landscapes of Utopia to the Margins of the Green Urban Life: For Whom Is the New Green City?», in City, 22 (3): 417–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126.
  10. Anguelovski I. and Connolly J. J. T. (eds). (2022). The green city and social injustice: 21 tales from North America and Europe, Routledge equity, justice and the sustainable city, Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon and New York, NY.
  11. Bastin J. F., Finegold Y., Garcia C., Mollicone D., Rezend M., Routh D., Zohner C. M. and Crowther T. W. (2019), «The Global Tree Restoration Potential», in Science, 365 (6448): 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0848.
  12. Betsill M. and Bulkeley H. (2003), Cities and Climate Change, Routledge, New York, NY
  13. Bherer L. (2010), «Successful and Unsuccessful Participatory Arrangements: Why Is There a Participatory Movement at the Local Level?», in Journal of Urban Affairs, 32 (3): 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00505.x.
  14. Biermann F., Kanie N. and Kim R. E. (2017), «Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals», in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Open issue, part II, 26–27 (giugno): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010.
  15. Brand P. (2007), «Green Subjection: The Politics of Neoliberal Urban Environmental Management», in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31 (3): 616–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00748.x.
  16. Bratman G. N., Anderson C. B., Berman M. G., Cochran B., de Vries S., Flanders J., Folke C., Frumkin H., Gross J. J., Hartig T., Kahn P. H., Kuo M., Lawler J. J., Levin P. S., Lindahl T., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Mitchell R., Ouyang Z., Roe J. and Daily G. C. (2019), «Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective», in Science Advances, 5 (7): eaax0903. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0903.
  17. Brenner N. and Theodore N. (2002), «Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”», in Antipode, 34 (3): 349–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00246.
  18. Brenner N. and Theodore N. (2005), «Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition», in City, 9 (1): 101–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810500092106.
  19. Bulkeley H. (2021), «Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City», in Environmental Politics, 30 (1–2): 266–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713.
  20. Campbell S. (1996), «Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities?: Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development», in Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (3): 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975696.
  21. Checker M. (2011), «Wiped out by the “Greenwave”: Environmental gentrification and the paradoxical politics of urban sustainability», in City and Society, 23 (2): 210–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x.
  22. Chiesi L. and Costa P. (2022), «Small Green Spaces in Dense Cities: An Exploratory Study of Perception and Use in Florence, Italy», in Sustainability, 14 (7): 4105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074105.
  23. Chiesi L. and Forte G. (2022), «Design for Climate Change in the Neoliberal Present: Gentrification, Ecocide, and the Loss of Urbanity in New York City», in Social Sciences, 11 (10): 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100451.
  24. Connolly J. J. T. (2019), «From Jacobs to the Just City: A foundation for challenging the green planning orthodoxy», in Cities, 91, 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.011
  25. Cole H. V. S., Lamarca M. G., Connolly J. J. T. and Anguelovski I. (2017), «Are Green Cities Healthy and Equitable? Unpacking the Relationship between Health, Green Space and Gentrification», in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71 (11): 1118–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-209201.
  26. Cucca R. (2012), «The unexpected consequences of sustainability. Green cities between innovation and ecogentrification», in Sociologica, 6 (2).
  27. Curran W. and Hamilton T. (2012), «Just Green Enough: Contesting Environmental Gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn», in Local Environment, 17 (9): 1027–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.729569.
  28. Dale A. and Newman L. L. (2009), «Sustainable development for some: Green urban development and affordability», in Local Environment, 14 (7): 669–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830903089283.
  29. Dooling S. (2009), «Ecological Gentrification: A Research Agenda Exploring Justice in the City», in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33 (3): 621–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x.
  30. European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2015), Towards an EU Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities: Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on ‘Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities’, European Commission, Brussels.
  31. Endreny T. A. (2018), «Strategically Growing the Urban Forest Will Improve Our World», in Nature Communications, 9 (1): 1160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0.
  32. Francini S., Chirici G., Chiesi L., Costa P., Caldarelli G. and Mancuso S. (2024), «Global Spatial Assessment of Potential for New Peri-Urban Forests to Combat Climate Change», in Nature Cities, 1 (4): 286–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00049-1.
  33. García-Lamarca M., Anguelovski I., Cole H., Connolly J. J., Argüelles L., Baró F., Loveless S., Frowein C. P. and Shokry G. (2021), «Urban green boosterism and city affordability: For whom is the ‘branded’ green city?», in Urban Studies, 58 (1): 90–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019885330.
  34. García-Lamarca M., Anguelovski I., Cole H. V. S., Connoll J. J. T., Pérez-del-Pulgar C., Shokry G. and Triguero-Mas M. (2022), «Urban green grabbing: Residential real estate developers discourse and practice in gentrifying Global North neighborhoods», in Geoforum, 128: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.016.
  35. Gómez-Baggethun E. and Barton D. N. (2013), «Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning», in Ecological Economics, 86: 235–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.
  36. Gould K. A. and Lewis T. L. (2017), Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice, Routledge Equity, Justice and the Sustainable City Series. Routledge. London, New York.
  37. Greenberg M. (2015), «“The Sustainability Edge”: Competition, Crisis, and the Rise of Green Urban Branding», in Isenhour C., McDonogh G. and Checker M. (eds.), Sustainability in the Global City, 1a ed., pp. 105–30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  38. Griscom B. W., Adams J., Ellis P. W., Houghton R. A., Lomax G., Miteva D. A., Schlesinger W. H., Shoch D., Siikamäki J. V., Smith P., Woodbury P., Zganjar C., Blackman A., Campari J., Conant R. T., Delgado C., Elias P., Gopalakrishna T., Hamsik M. R. and Fargione J. (2017), «Natural Climate Solutions», in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (44): 11645–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710465114.
  39. Haase D., Kabisch S., Haase A., Andersson E., Banzhaf E., Baró F., Brenck M., Fischer L. K., Frantzeskaki N., Kabisch N., Krellenberg K., Kremer P., Kronenberg J., Larondelle N., Mathey J., Pauleit S., Ring I., Rink D., Schwarz N. and Wolff, M. (2017), «Greening Cities – To Be Socially Inclusive? About the Alleged Paradox of Society and Ecology in Cities», in Habitat International, 64: 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005.
  40. Harper E.T. (2020), «Ecological Gentrification in Response to Apocalyptic Narratives of Climate Change: The Production of an Immuno-political Fantasy», in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44 (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12842.
  41. Hartig T. and Kahn P. H. (2016), «Living in cities, naturally», in Science, 352 (6288): 938–40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3759.
  42. Hartig T., Mitchell R., De Vries S. and Frumkin H. (2014), «Nature and health», in Annual review of public health, 35: 207–28.
  43. Heynen N. and Perkins H. A. (2005), «Scalar Dialectics in Green: Urban Private Property and the Contradictions of the Neoliberalization of Nature», in Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16 (1): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045575052000335393.
  44. Immergluck D. (2009), «Large Redevelopment Initiatives, Housing Values and Gentrification: The Case of the Atlanta Beltline», in Urban Studies, 46 (8): 1723–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009105500.
  45. Immergluck D. and Balan T. (2018), «Sustainable for whom? Green urban development, environmental gentrification, and the Atlanta Beltline», in Urban Geography, 39 (4): 546–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041.
  46. Joassart-Marcelli P., Wolch J. and Salim Z. (2011), «Building the Healthy City: The Role of Nonprofits in Creating Active Urban Parks», in Urban Geography, 32(5), 682–711. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.32.5.682
  47. Keil R. (2003), «Urban Political Ecology», in Urban Geography, 24 (8): 723–38. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.8.723.
  48. Keil R. (2020), «An urban political ecology for a world of cities», in Urban Studies, 57 (11): 2357–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020919086.
  49. Koprowska K., Kronenberg J., Kuźma I. B. and Łaszkiewicz E. (2020), «Condemned to green? Accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces to people experiencing homelessness», in Geoforum, 113: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.017
  50. Kotsila P., Anguelovski I., Baró F., Langemeyer J., Sekulova F. and Connolly J.J. (2021), «Nature-Based Solutions as Discursive Tools and Contested Practices in Urban Nature’s Neoliberalisation Processes», in Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4 (2): 252–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848620901437.
  51. Kuo M. (2015), «How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway», in Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093.
  52. Lee D. (2022), «Whose space is privately owned public space? Exclusion, underuse and the lack of knowledge and awareness», in Urban Research & Practice, 15(3), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2020.1815828
  53. Liebelt V., Bartke S. and Schwarz N. (2019), «Urban Green Spaces and Housing Prices: An Alternative Perspective», in Sustainability, 11 (13): 3707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133707
  54. Long J. and Rice J. L. (2019), «From Sustainable Urbanism to Climate Urbanism», in Urban Studies, 56 (5): 992-1008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018770846.
  55. Loughran K. (2014), «Parks for Profit: The High Line, Growth Machines, and the Uneven Development of Urban Public Spaces», in City & Community, 13 (1): 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12050.
  56. Low S. (2013), «Public Space and Diversity: Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice for Parks», in The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning and Culture, Taylor and Francis, Routledge, pp. 295-310.
  57. Ma Y., Koomen E., Rouwendal J. and Wang Z. (2024), «The increasing value of urban parks in a growing metropole», in Cities, 147: 104794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104794
  58. Moini G. (2012), «La partecipazione come risorsa discorsiva delle politiche neoliberiste», in Segatori R. e D’Albergo E. (a cura di), Governance e partecipazione politica. Teorie e ricerche sociologiche, Franco Angeli, Milano, pp. 43-64.
  59. Neidig J., Anguelovski I., Albaina A. and Pascual U. (2022), «“We are the Green Capital”: Navigating the political and sustainability fix narratives of urban greening», in Cities, 131: 103999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103999
  60. Németh J. (2009), «Defining a Public: The Management of Privately Owned Public Space», in Urban Studies, 46(11): 2463–2490 https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342903
  61. Németh J. and Schmidt S. (2011), «The privatization of public space: Modeling and measuring publicness» in Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36057
  62. Newman A. (2015), «Landscape of Discontent: Urban Sustainability in Immigrant Paris. Landsc. of Discontent: Urban Sustainability», in Immigr. Paris. Landscape of Discontent: Urban Sustainability in Immigrant Paris, University of Minnesota Press.
  63. Pearsall H. and Anguelovski I. (2016), «Contesting and Resisting Environmental Gentrification: Responses to New Paradoxes and Challenges for Urban Environmental Justice», in Sociological Research Online, 21 (3). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3979.
  64. Pearsall H. and Eller J. K. (2020), «Locating the green space paradox: A study of gentrification and public green space accessibility in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania», in Landscape and Urban Planning, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103708
  65. Perkins H. A. (2013), «Consent to Neoliberal Hegemony through Coercive Urban Environmental Governance», in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(1): 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01128.x
  66. Quinton J., Nesbitt L. and Sax D. (2022), «How Well Do We Know Green Gentrification? A Systematic Review of the Methods», in Progress in Human Geography, 46 (4): 960–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221104478.
  67. Ramyar R., Ackerman A. and Johnston D. M. (2021), «Adapting cities for climate change through urban green infrastructure planning», in Cities, 117: 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103316.
  68. Rigolon A., Keith S. J., Harris B., Mullenbach L. E., Larson L. R. and Rushing J. (2020), «More than “Just Green Enough”: Helping Park Professionals Achieve Equitable Greening and Limit Environmental Gentrification», in Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 38 (3): 29–54. https://doi.org/10.18666/JPRA-2019-9654.
  69. Rigolon A. and Németh J. (2018), «“We’re Not in the Business of Housing:” Environmental Gentrification and the Nonprofitization of Green Infrastructure Projects», in Cities, 81: 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.016.
  70. Rigolon A. and Németh J. (2020), «Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?», in Urban Studies, 57 (2): 402–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019849380.
  71. Rigolon A., Yañez E., Aboelata M. J. and Bennett R. (2022), «“A park is not just a park”: Toward counter-narratives to advance equitable green space policy in the United States», in Cities, 128: 103792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103792.
  72. Salbitano F., Borelli S., Conigliaro M. and Chen Y. (2016), «Guidelines on Urban and Peri-Urban Forestry», FAO Forestry Paper 178, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  73. Schlosberg D. (2013), «Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse», in Environmental Politics, 22 (1): 37–55.
  74. Swyngedouw E. and Ernstson H. (2018), «Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-Biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene», in Theory, Culture & Society, 35 (6): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418757314.
  75. Torres P. H. C., Irazábal C. and Jacobi P. R. (2022), «Urban Greening in the Global South: Green Gentrification and Beyond», in Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.865940
  76. Turnhout E., Metze T., Wyborn C., Klenk N. and Louder E. (2020), «The Politics of Co-Production: Participation, Power, and Transformation», in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42: 15–21 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009.
  77. Verheij J., Ay D., Gerber J.-D. and Nahrath S. (2023), «Ensuring Public Access to Green Spaces in Urban Densification: The Role of Planning and Property Rights», in Planning Theory and Practice, 24(3), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2023.2239215
  78. Wolch J. R., Byrne J. and Newell J. P. (2014), «Urban Green Space, Public Health, and Environmental Justice: The Challenge of Making Cities “Just Green Enough”», in Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 234–44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017