Vol. 15 No. 30 (2024): Putting the Political in Its Place: Towards a Political Sociology of Sustainability
Passim

Preserving the collective. Strategies, challenges and fatigue in coping with individualization and multiple belongings

PDF
  • Sandro Busso,
  • Michele Garau
Sandro Busso
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Italy
Michele Garau
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-14741

Published 2024-12-30

Keywords

  • collective action,
  • individualization,
  • multiple belongings,
  • militancy,
  • collective identity

How to Cite

Busso, S., & Garau, M. (2024). Preserving the collective. Strategies, challenges and fatigue in coping with individualization and multiple belongings. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 15(30), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-14741

Copyright (c) 2024 Sandro Busso, Michele Garau

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The process of individualization and the proliferation of multiple memberships have long undermined the classical model of the “synthesis structures” in which the multiple styles of engagement of activists and militants used to be embedded. Even if they do not mark their demise or the tout court disappearance of collective identities, they do impose changes in order to make possible the creation of collective actors (in the most proper sense) capable of embracing an increasing heterogeneity of their members. Within this scenario, the article focuses on how activists who are not resigned to the fact that individualization is an inevitable process attempt to preserve a collective dimension as the core of their political engagement. The need to address loose participation and the presence of multiple affiliations without being able to rely on past solutions implies first bringing the collective into play not as taken for granted, but rather as the stake of strategies that have to be elaborated: not so much a means, but rather increasingly an end of political action.  Besides exploring the strategies put in place to achieve this goal, the article focuses on the difficulty and the fatigue of handling this challenge. Such a fatigue will is defined in terms of «active disaffection», to signify as much the disillusionment that even at a young age seems to unify the trajectories of militancy, as the commitment to find alternative paths toward a goal that is considered imperative.

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Alteri L., Leccardi C. and Raffini L. (2017), «Youth and the reinvention of politics. New forms of participation in the age of individualization and presentification», in Partecipazione e conflitto, 9(3): 717-747.
  2. Beck U. and Beck-Gernsheim E. (2002), Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences (Vol. 13), Sage, New York.
  3. Benford R. D. and Snow D. A. (2000), «Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment», in Annual review of sociology, 26(1): 611-639.
  4. Bosi L. and Zamponi L. (2015), «Direct social actions and economic crises: The relationship between forms of action and socio-economic context in Italy», in Partecipazione e conflitto, 8(2): 367-391.
  5. Buechler S. M. (1995), «New social movement theories», in Sociological Quarterly, 36(3): 441-464
  6. Burt R. S. (2004), «Structural holes and good ideas», in American journal of sociology, 110(2): 349-399.
  7. Cohen J. L. (1985), «Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements», in Social research, 52(4): 663-716.
  8. Cottin-Marx S. (2023), «Le burn-out militant. Réflexions pour ne pas être consumé par le feu militant», in Mouvements, 113: 156-164.
  9. Davies H., Nutley S. M. and Smith P. C. (1999), «What Works? The Role of Evidence in Public Sector Policy and Practice», in Public Money & Management, 19(1): 3-5.
  10. Della Porta D. (2005a), «Multiple belongings, tolerant identities, and the construction of ‘another politics’: Between the European social forum and the local social fora», in D. Della Porta and S. Tarrow (eds.), Transnational protest and global activism, Rowman e Littlefield Publishers Inc., Lahman-Boulder-New York-Toronto-Oxford, pp. 175-202.
  11. Della Porta D. (2005b), «Globalizations and democracy», in Democratisation, 12(5): 668-685.
  12. Della Porta D. and Mattoni A. (2014), «Patterns of diffusion and the transnational dimension of protest in the movements of the crisis: An introduction», in D. Della Porta and A. Mattoni, Spreading protest. Social movements in times of crisis, ECPR Press, Colchester, pp. 1-18.
  13. Diani M. (2009), «The structural bases of protest events: Multiple memberships and civil society networks in the 15 February 2003 anti-war demonstrations», in Acta Sociologica, 52(1): 63-83.
  14. Diani M. and Della Porta D. (2006), Social movements: An introduction, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken.
  15. Diani M. and Mische A. (2015), «Network approaches and social movements», in D. Della Porta and M. Diani (eds.), The Oxford handbook of social movements, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 306-325.
  16. Faas D. (2016), Negotiating political identities: Multiethnic schools and youth in Europe, Routledge, London.
  17. Freeden M. (2005), «Confronting the chimera of a ‘post-ideological’ age», in Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 8(2): 247-62.
  18. Gamson J. (1996), «The organizational shaping of collective identity: The case of lesbian and gay film festivals in New York», in Sociological Forum, 11: 231-26.
  19. Giannini V. and Pirone M. (2019), «Political participation in self-managed social centers. Direct social action and institutionalization in Bologna city», in Partecipazione e Conflitto, 12(3): 941-969.
  20. Hamel P. and Maheu L. (2004), «The Politics of Collective Identity and Action: Beyond new social movements: social conflicts and institutions», in K. Nasch and A. Scott, (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, pp. 261-270
  21. Hirschman A. O. (1970), Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, Harvard university press, Cambridge.
  22. Husted E., Just S. N., du Plessis E. M. and Dahlman S. (2023), «The communicative constitution of atomization: online prepper communities and the crisis of collective action», in Journal of Communication, 73(4): 368-381.
  23. Inglehart R. (1990), «Values, Ideology and Cognitive Mobilization in New Social Movements», in R.J. Dalton and M Kuechler, (eds.), Challenging the Political Order: New Social and Political Movements in Western Democracies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 43-66.
  24. Klatch R. E. (2004), «The underside of social movements: The effects of destructive affective ties», in Qualitative Sociology, 27:487-509.
  25. Lash S. (2002), «Individualization in a Non-Linear Mode», in U. Beck and E. Gernsheim Beck, Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences, pp. vii – xiii.
  26. Lyotard J. F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester.
  27. Castells M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken.
  28. McCallion M. and Maines D.R. (1999), «The liturgical social movement in the Vatican II Catholic Church», in Social Movements, Conflicts and Changes, 21: 125–49.
  29. Melucci A. (1982), L’invenzione del presente. Movimenti sociali nelle società complesse, Il Mulino, Bologna
  30. Melucci A. (1995), «Individualization and globalization: new frontiers for collective action and personal identity», in Hitotsubashi journal of social studies, in 27: 129-142.
  31. Micheletti M. (2002), «Individualized collective action», in Nordic Political Science Association’s Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, Paper for the Nordic Political Science Association’s Meeting Workshop, pp. 14-17.
  32. Micheletti M. (2003), «Shopping with and for Virtues», in (id.), Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action, Palgrave Macmillan US, New York, pp. 149-168.
  33. Naegler L. (2018), «Goldman-Sachs doesn’t care if you raise chicken’: the challenges of resistant prefiguration», in Social Movement Studies, 17(5): 507-523.
  34. Reger J. (2002), «Organizational dynamics and construction of multiple feminist identities in the National Organization for Women», in Gender & Society, 16(5): 710-727.
  35. Roussos K. (2019), «Grassroots collective action within and beyond institutional and state solutions: the (re-)politicization of everyday life in crisis-ridden Greece», in Social Movement Studies 18(3): 265-283.
  36. Stolle D. and Micheletti M. (2013), Political Consumerism. Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  37. Stout M. (eds.) (2019), From austerity to abundance? Creative approaches to coordinating the common good, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley.
  38. Terriquez V., Brenes T. and Lopez A. (2018), «Intersectionality as a multipurpose collective action frame: The case of the undocumented youth movement», in Ethnicities, 18(2): 260-276.
  39. Wagenaar H. (2019), «Foreword: Toward a politics of belonging», in M. Stout, (eds.), From Austerity to Abundance?: Creative Approaches to Coordinating the Common Good, pp. 9-13.
  40. Wahlen S. (2018), «Foodsharing: Reflecting on individualized collective action in a collaborative consumption community organization», in I. Crux., R. Ganga and S. Wahlen, (eds.), Contemporary Collaborative Consumption: Trust and Reciprocity Revisited, Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 57-75.
  41. Wuthnow R. (1998), Loose Connections. Joining Together in America’s Fragmented Communities, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  42. Zamponi L. and Bosi L. (2018), «Politicizing solidarity in times of crisis: The politics of Alternative Action Organizations in Greece, Italy, and Spain», in American Behavioral Scientist, 62(6):796-815.
  43. Žižek S. (2000), «Holding the place», in J. Butler, (eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality, Verso, London, pp. 308-27.