Published 2026-09-25
Keywords
- environmental sustainability,
- Agri-livestock systems,
- Composite indicators,
- natural capital,
- Farm-level assessment
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 Jacopo Gabriele Orlando, Geremia Gios, Margherita Tiradritti, Daniele Valiante

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
Abstract
This paper proposes a way to overcome the limitations of the environmental sustainability indicators currently used for agri-livestock production. The reference paradigm is that of safe minimum standards. Five environmental components are considered: soil, water, biodiversity, gaseous emissions and energy. For each, an emergent property is identified and assessed using a single indicator. The five elementary indicators are aggregated following the pathway defined for the assessment of the ecological footprint. The results obtained by applying the proposed methodology to a Tuscan agri-livestock farm show that, although further refinements are possible, the method is sufficiently straightforward to apply.
Downloads
References
- Alkemade R., van Oorschot M., Miles L., Nellemann C., Bakkenes M., ten Brink B. (2009). GLO-BIO3: A framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems, 12(3): 374-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9229-5
- Banos-Gonzalez I., Martinez-Fernandez J., Esteve-Selma M.A. (2016). Using dynamic sustainability indicators to assess environmental policy measures in Biosphere Reserves. Ecological Indica-tors, 67: 565-576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.045
- Berg F., Koelbel J.F., Rigobon R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG rat-ings. Review of Finance, 26(6): 1315-1344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
- Bishop R.C. (1978). Endangered species and uncertainty: The economics of a safe minimum stand-ard. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(1): 10-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1240156
- Bockstaller C., Guichard L., Makowski D., Aveline A., Girardin P., Plantureux S. (2021). Agronomic as well as environmental impacts of agriculture: A review of indicators and methods for their assessment. Ecological Indicators, 124, 107381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107381
- Braca G., Mariani S., Tropeano R. (2024). Internal Flow, ISPRA Annuario dei dati ambientali. Risor-se idriche e bilancio, Update sheet 30/06/2024.
- Bunemann E.K., Bongiorno G., Bai Z., Creamer R.E., De Deyn G.B., de Goede R., Fleskens L., Geis-sen L., Kuyper T.W., Mader P., Pulleman M., Sukkel W., van Groenigen J.W., Brussaard L. (2018). Soil quality – A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120: 105-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030.
- Caporali F., Mancinelli R., Campiglia E., Di Felice V., Vazzana C., Lazzerini G., Benedetti A., Moca-li S., Calabrese J. (2009). Indicatori di sostenibilità per la biodiversità in agricoltura. Linee gui-da, strumenti e metodi per la valutazione della qualità degli agroecosistemi. Istituto Superiore per la protezione e la ricerca ambientale (ISPRA). ISBN 978-88-448-0337-7
- Doran J.W., Zeiss M.R. (2000). Soil health and sustainability: Managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology, 15(1): 3-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6
- EU Commission (2020). Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives. COM/2020/380 final, Brussels.
- EU Commission (2022). Platform on Sustainable Finance. Final Report on Minimum Safeguards, Brussels.
- EU Commission (2025). A Vision for Agriculture and Food: Shaping Together an Attractive Farming and Agri-Food Sector for Future Generations. COM/2025/75 final; Document 52025DC0075, Brussels.
- FAO (2008). Agriculture and Environmental Services: Can Low-Income Farmers Comply? FAO, Rome.
- FAO (2022). Food Balances [Data set]. FAOSTAT, Rome. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS/report.
- FAO (2023). Pathways Towards Lower Emissions – A Global Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Options from Livestock Agrifood Systems. FAO, Rome.
- Fiala M. (2012). Energia da biomasse agricole. Produzione e utilizzo. Con esempi applicativi. Mag-gioli Editore, Santarcangelo di Romagna.
- Frascarelli A., Bartolucci P.E., Ciliberti S. (2025). Note on carbon sequestration policies in the Euro-pean Union. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 80(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-15795
- Galli A., Wackernagel M., Iha K., Lazarus E. (2020). Ecological footprint: Implications for sustaina-bility science and policy. Ecological Indicators, 111, 106035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.019
- Gan X., Fernandez I.C., Guo J., Wilson M., Zhao Y., Zhou B., Wu J. (2017). When to use what: Meth-ods for weighting and aggregating sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 81: 491-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068
- Gari S.R., Newton A., Icely J.D. (2022). Update on the application of the DPSIR framework to socio-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 134: 53-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.013
- Garrido A., Iglesias A. (2023). Water for agriculture and food security: Adapting to climate change through systemic and nature-based solutions. Agricultural Water Management, 278, 108145.
- Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2022). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/COP/DEC/15/4), United Nations, New York.
- Guinée J. (2016). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: What Is It and What Are Its Challenges?. In Clift R., Druckman A. (eds) Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology. Springer, Cham. Springer Open. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_3
- Hauschild M.Z., Rosenbaum R.K., Olsen S.I. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham.
- Hayashi K. (2023). Challenges in agricultural life cycle assessment: A review. Agronomy, 13(4), 1083.
- IIASA Systems Analysis Research (2025). Analytical Models for High-Order Synergies in SDG Net-works, IIASA Annual Report, Laxenburg.
- IPCC (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Invento-ries. Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeVolume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management.
- ISPRA (2021). Il Bilancio Idrologico GIS based su scala nazionale su griglia regolare BIGBANG: metodologia e stime. Rapporto sulla disponibilità naturale della risorsa idrica, ISPRA n. 339/2021, ISPRA, Rome.
- ISPRA (2025). BIGBANG 80: ASCII grid, ISPRA, Rome. https://groupware.sinanet.isprambiente.it/bigbang-data/library/bigbang_80/ascii_grid
- Jemma Nolan J., Jaiswal S., Massy J., Jaiswal A.K. (2026). Sustainability reporting in agrifood sys-tems: A systematic review of implementation challenges and pathways. Environmental Science & Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104449
- Karlen D.L., Mausbach M.J., Doran J.W., Cline R.G., Harris R.F., Schuman G.E. (1997). Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61(1): 4-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010001x.
- Lehmann J., Bossio D.A., Kogel-Knabner I., Rillig M.C. (2020). Soil carbon storage and carbon cycle feedbacks in the context of emerging soil health systems. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4): 210-220.
- Letcher T.M. (eds) (2021). Climate Change: Observed Impacts on Planet Earth. 3rd ed. Elsevier, Am-sterdam.
- Longa CMO, Nicola L, Antonielli L, Mescalchin E, Zanzotti R, Turco E, Pertot I. (2017). Soil micro-biota respond to green manure in organic vineyards. J Appl Microbiol, 123(6): 1547-1560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13606. Epub 2017 Nov 3. PMID: 28990280.
- Macellari M., Carboni A. (2025). Rendicontare la sostenibilità nell'agrifood: Linee guida CSRD ed ESRS per le imprese agricole. FrancoAngeli, Milan.
- MEA (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
- Menta C., Conti F.D., Pinto S., Bodini A. (2022). Soil Biological Quality index (QBS-ar): Over 20 years of applications in biodiversity and soil quality assessment. Ecological Indicators, 141, 109132.
- Montanarella L., Panagos P. (2021). The relevance of sustainable soil management within the Euro-pean Green Deal. Land Use Policy, 100, 104950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104950.
- Nortcliff S. (2002). Standardisation of soil quality attributes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environ-ment, 88(2): 161-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00253-5.
- Pereira L.S., Paredes P., Rodrigues G.C. (2020). Green and blue water footprint accounting for agri-cultural crops: Discussing methods, limitations, and perspectives. Agricultural Water Manage-ment, 229, 105943.
- Rousseau D., Wilby J., Billingham J., Blachfellner S. (2020). General Systemology: Transdiscipli-narity for Discovery, Design and Meaning. Springer, Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2211-6
- Sachs J.D., Lafortune G., Fuller G., Drumm E. (2023). Sustainable Development Report 2023: Pro-gress, Challenges, and Pathways to the SDGs. Dublin University Press, Dublin.
- Stefanon B., Mele M., Pulina G. (eds.) (2018). Allevamento animale: sostenibilità ambientale (i prin-cipi). FrancoAngeli, Milan.
- Tamburini G., Bommarco R., Kleijn D., van der Putten W.H., Marini L., Luijten S.H., Dainese M. (2020). Species diversification enhances agricultural productivity without compromising yield. Science Advances, 6(42): eaba1715.
- van der Werf H.M.G., Knudsen M.T., Cederberg C. (2020). Towards better representation of organic agriculture in life cycle assessment. Nature Sustainability, 3(6): 419-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0489-6
- von Bertalanffy L. (1971). Teoria generale dei sistemi. Fondamenti, sviluppo, applicazioni. ISEDI, Milan.
- Waas T., Huge J., Block T., Wright T., Benitez-Capistros F., Verbruggen A. (2014). Sustainability as-sessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable deve-lopment. Sustainability, 6(9): 5512-5534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512.
- Wackernagel M., Onisto L., Bello P., Callejas Linares A., Lopez Falfan I.S., Mendez Garcia J., Suarez Guerrero A.I., Suarez Guerrero M.G. (1999). National natural capital accounting with the eco-logical footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29(3): 375-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)90063-5
- Wang T., Kreuter U., Davis C., Cheye S. (2024). Climate impacts of alternative beef production sys-tems depend on the functional unit used: Weight or monetary value. Proceedings of the Nation-al Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(31), e2321245121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2321245121.
- WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.