Vol. 78 No. 3 (2023)
Food policy in transition - Research Articles

Food Policy Coherence and Integration: a review of adopted methodologies

PDF
  • Francesca Monticone,
  • Antonella Samoggia
Francesca Monticone
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna
Antonella Samoggia
Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14439

Published 2024-04-03

Keywords

  • food policy,
  • policy coherence,
  • policy integration,
  • governance,
  • literature review

How to Cite

Monticone, F., & Samoggia, A. (2024). Food Policy Coherence and Integration: a review of adopted methodologies. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 78(3), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.36253/rea-14439

Copyright (c) 2023 Francesca Monticone, Antonella Samoggia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Multiple scholars in the last two decades have called for a coherent and integrated approach to food policy to address the challenges of the current food systems. Food Policy Coherence and Integration (PCI) are both challenging, as food matters are addressed at more than one level of governance and across several policy domains. Moreover, the analysis of food PCI has been carried out with different methodologies, but no reviews of such methodologies exist in the literature. Thus, the objective of the present study is to fill this gap, by reviewing which research methods were used to assess food PCI. The research adopts a bibliometric methodological approach to develop a quantitative network analysis of the identified studies and content analysis. Data collection was performed on Web of Science and Scopus including exclusively scientific articles from peer-reviewed journals. A total of 35 articles published since 2006 were included in the analysis. The main topics addressed were health and nutrition policies, followed by food security and agriculture. A variety of methods were used to assess Coherence and Integration. The first methodological phase often aimed at creating a policy inventory, followed by a second methodological phase to assess PCI. Some studies used interviews to identify the relevant policies and to comment on them. Other studies carried out PCI assessment relying on researchers’ expertise. To conclude, food PCI studies choose from a variety of methodologies the one that better fits their aims.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Alliance Environnement (2018). Evaluation study of the impact of the CAP on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions – Publications Office of the EU. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/29eee93e-9ed0-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1.
  2. Alons G. (2017). Environmental policy integration in the EU’s common agricultural policy: greening or greenwashing? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(11): 1604-1622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1334085.
  3. Arcuri S., Minotti B., Galli F. (2022). Food policy integration in small cities: The case of intermunicipal governance in Lucca, Italy. Journal of Rural Studies, 89(December 2021): 287-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.12.005.
  4. Baker P., Friel S., Gleeson D., Thow A.M., Labonte R. (2019). Trade and nutrition policy coherence: A framing analysis and Australian case study. Public Health Nutrition, 22(12): 2329-2337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019000752.
  5. Baldy J., Bornemann B., Kleinschmit D., Kruse S. (2022). Policy integration from a practice-theoretical perspective: integrated food policy in the making in two German cities. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 24(6): 598611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2015305.
  6. Barling D., Lang T., Caraher M. (2002). Joined-up food policy? The trials of governance, public policy and the food system. Social Policy & Administration, 36(6): 556-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.t01-1-00304.
  7. Battams S., Townsend B. (2018). Power asymmetries, policy incoherence and noncommunicable disease control – a qualitative study of policy actor views. Critical Public Health. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1492093.
  8. Biesbroek R., Candel J.J.L. (2020). Mechanisms for policy (dis)integration: explaining food policy and climate change adaptation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 53(1): 61-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09354-2.
  9. Billings L., Pradeilles R., Gillespie S., Vanderkooy A., Diatta D., Toure M., Diatta A.D., Verstraeten R. (2021). Coherence for nutrition: insights from nutrition-relevant policies and programmes in Burkina Faso and Nigeria. Health Policy and Planning, 36(10): 1574-1592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab108.
  10. Candel J.J.L., Biesbroek R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3): 211-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11077-016-9248-Y/TABLES/4.
  11. Candel J.J.L., Biesbroek R. (2018). Policy integration in the EU governance of global food security. Food Security, 10(1): 195-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0752-5.
  12. Candel J.J.L., Pereira L. (2017). Towards integrated food policy: Main challenges and steps ahead. Environmental Science and Policy, 73(September 2016): 89-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.010.
  13. Cejudo G.M., Michel C.L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4): 745-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5.
  14. De Roeck F., Orbie J., Delputte S. (2018). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into the European Union’s development assistance. Environmental Science and Policy, 81(July 2017): 36-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.12.005.
  15. De Schutter O., Jacobs N., Clément C. (2020). A “Common Food Policy” for Europe: How governance reforms can spark a shift to healthy diets and sustainable food systems. Food Policy, 96, 101849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101849.
  16. Farmery A.K., Kajlich L., Voyer M., Bogard J.R., Duarte A. (2020). Integrating fisheries, food and nutrition – Insights from people and policies in Timor-Leste. Food Policy, 91, 101826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101826.
  17. Friel S., Baker P., Thow A.M., Gleeson D., Townsend B., Schram A. (2019). An exposé of the realpolitik of trade negotiations: Implications for population nutrition. Public Health Nutrition, 22(16): 3083-3091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019001642.
  18. Garton K., Swinburn B., Thow A.M. (2022). The interface between international trade and investment agreements and food environment policymaking: A conceptual framework. Frontiers in Political Science, 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.996017.
  19. Harahap F., Silveira S., Khatiwada D. (2017). Land allocation to meet sectoral goals in Indonesia - An analysis of policy coherence. Land Use Policy, 61: 451-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.033.
  20. Hawkes C. (2016). UNSCN Discussion Paper - Enhancing Coherence between Trade Policy and Nutrition Action. https://www.unscn.org/en/unscn-publications?idnews=1277.
  21. Jiren T.S., Leventon J., Jager N.W., Dorresteijn I., Schultner J., Senbeta F., Bergsten A., Fischer J. (2021). Governance Challenges at the Interface of Food Security and Biodiversity Conservation: A Multi-Level Case Study from Ethiopia. Environmental Management, 67(4): 717-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01432-7.
  22. Kelleher L., Henchion M., O’Neill E. (2019). Policy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland. Sustainability (Switzerland). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247247.
  23. Lang T., Barling D., Caraher M. (2009). Food Policy: Integrating health, environment and society. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19320240903336944.
  24. Matthews A. (2008). The European Union’s common agricultural policy and developing countries: the struggle for coherence. Journal of European Integration, 30(3): 381-399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802141998.
  25. Medina Hidalgo D., Nunn P.D., Beazley H., Burkhart S., Rantes J. (2022). Adaptation, sustainable food systems and healthy diets: an analysis of climate policy integration in Fiji and Vanuatu. Climate Policy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2095969.
  26. Medina Hidalgo D., Nunn P.D., Beazley H. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for food systems in a changing climate: A systematic review of climate policy integration. Environmental Science and Policy, 124: 485-495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.017.
  27. Meijers E., Stead D. (2004). Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review. 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environment Change: Greening of Policies – Interlinkages and Policy Integration, Berlin, 1-15.
  28. Milani-Bonab A., Kalantari N., Takian A., Haghighian-Roudsari A. (2022). Food and agriculture, nutrition and health related policy integration in Iran’s national development agenda and their alignment with the sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 0123456789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02171-3.
  29. Minotti B., Cimini A., D’Amico G., Marino D., Mazzocchi G., Tarra S. (2022). Food Policy Processes in the City of Rome: A Perspective on Policy Integration and Governance Innovation. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.786799.
  30. Monticone F., Barling D., Parsons K., Samoggia A. (2023). Identifying food policy coherence in Italian regional policies: The case of Emilia-Romagna. Food Policy, 119, 102519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODPOL.2023.102519.
  31. Moschitz H. (2018). Where is urban food policy in Switzerland? A frame analysis. International Planning Studies, 23(2): 180-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2017.1389644.
  32. Mosnier A., Schmidt-Traub G., Obersteiner M., Jones S., Javalera-Rincon V., DeClerck F., Thomson M., Sperling F., Harrison P., Pérez-Guzmán K., McCord G.C., Navarro-Garcia J., Marcos-Martinez R., Wu G.C., Poncet J., Douzal C., Steinhauser J., Monjeau A., Frank F., Lehtonen H., Rämö J., Leach N., Gonzalez-Abraham C.E., Ghosh R.K., Jha C., Singh V., Bai Z., Jin X., Ma L., Strokov A., Potashnikov V., Orduña-Cabrera F., Neubauer R., Diaz M., Penescu L., Domínguez E.A., Chavarro J., Pena A., Basnet S., Fetzer I., Baker J., Zerriffi H., Reyes Gallardo R., Bryan B.A., Hadjikakou M., Lotze-Campen H., Stevanovic M., Smith A., Costa W., Habiburrachman A.H.F., Immanuel G., Selomane O., Daloz A.-S., Andrew R., van Oort B., Imanirareba D., Molla K.G., Woldeyes F.B., Soterroni A.C., Scarabello M., Ramos F.M., Boer R., Winarni N.L., Supriatna J., Low W.S., Howe Fan A.C., Naramabuye F.X., Niyitanga F., Olguín M., Popp A., Rasche L., Godfray C., Hall J.W., Grundy M.J., Wang X. (2023). How can diverse national food and land-use priorities be reconciled with global sustainability targets? Lessons from the FABLE initiative. Sustainability Science, 18(1): 335-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01227-7.
  33. Muscat A., de Olde E.M., Kovacic Z., de Boer I.J.M., Ripoll-Bosch R. (2021). Food, energy or biomaterials? Policy coherence across agro-food and bioeconomy policy domains in the EU. Environmental Science and Policy, 123: 21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.001.
  34. Namugumya B.S., Candel J.J.L., Talsma E.F., Termeer C.J.A.M. (2020a). A mechanisms-based explanation of nutrition policy (dis)integration processes in Uganda. Food Policy, 92, 101878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101878.
  35. Namugumya B.S., Candel J.J.L., Talsma E.F., Termeer C.J.A.M. (2020b). Towards concerted government efforts? Assessing nutrition policy integration in Uganda. Food Security, 12(2): 355-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-020-01010-5.
  36. Nilsson M., Chisholm E., Griggs D., Howden-Chapman P., McCollum D., Messerli P., Neumann B., Stevance A.S., Visbeck M., Stafford-Smith M. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13(6): 1489-1503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-018-0604-Z/TABLES/2.
  37. OECD (2003). Policy coherence: Vital for global development.
  38. OECD (2021). Making Better Policies for Food Systems. In Making Better Policies for Food Systems. OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/DDFBA4DE-EN.
  39. Parsons K. (2019). Brief 3: Integrated Food Policy – What is it and how can it help connect food systems. In Rethinking Food Policy: A Fresh Approach to Policy and Practice of Teacher Education (pp. 11-15).
  40. Parsons K., Barling D. (2022). England’s food policy coordination and the Covid-19 response. Food Security, 14(4): 1027-1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S12571-022-01280-1/TABLES/3.
  41. Parsons K., Barling D., Lang T. (2018). UK Policymaking Institutions and Their Implications for Integrated Food Policy. In Advances in Food Security and Sustainability. Elsevier Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.af2s.2018.09.005.
  42. Parsons K., Hawkes C. (2019). Brief 5: Policy coherence in food systems.
  43. Pawson P., Tilley N. (1997). Evaluation for the 21st Century: A Handbook – Google Books. Sage.
  44. Ruckert A., Schram A., Labonté R., Friel S., Gleeson D., Thow A.M. (2017). Policy coherence, health and the sustainable development goals: a health impact assessment of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Critical Public Health, 27(1): 86-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2016.1178379.
  45. Sabatier P., Jenkins-Smith H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework. In Theories of the policy process (pp. 117-166). Westview Press.
  46. Schmidt N.M. (2020). Late bloomer? Agricultural policy integration and coordination patterns in climate policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(6): 893-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1617334.
  47. Sibbing L., Candel J.J.L., Termeer K. (2021). A comparative assessment of local municipal food policy integration in the Netherlands. International Planning Studies, 26(1): 56-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2019.1674642.
  48. Šumrada T., Lovec M., Juvančič L., Rac I., Erjavec E. (2020). Fit for the task? Integration of biodiversity policy into the post-2020 Common Agricultural Policy: Illustration on the case of Slovenia. Journal for Nature Conservation, 54(December 2019), 125804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125804.
  49. Thow A.M., Greenberg S., Hara M., Friel S., duToit A., Sanders D. (2018). Improving policy coherence for food security and nutrition in South Africa: a qualitative policy analysis. Food Security, 10(4): 1105-1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0813-4.
  50. Thow A.M., Kadiyala S., Khandelwal S., Menon P., Downs S., Reddy K.S. (2016). Toward Food Policy for the Dual Burden of Malnutrition: An Exploratory Policy Space Analysis in India. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 37(3): 261-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572116653863.
  51. Tosun J., Lang A. (2017). Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
  52. Ugland T., Veggeland F. (2006). Experiments in food safety policy integration in the European Union. JCMS, 44(3): 607-624.
  53. Werlang Girardi M. (2018). Policy coherence in the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: the Brazilian School Feeding Programme Case Study. History of International Law, 15(3): 505-530. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results.
  54. Zembe A., Nemakonde L.D., Chipangura P. (2022). Policy coherence between food security, disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in South Africa: A summative content analysis approach. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 14(1): 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/JAMBA.V14I1.1173.