Vol. 128 No. 2 (2024)
Original Article

A forgotten debate in the history of medicine: vascular anastomoses, from open functional relationships to tight structural connections

Paola Saccheri
Department of Medicine, Section of Anatomy and History of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
Enrico Crivellato
Department of Medicine, Section of Anatomy and History of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
Luciana Travan
Department of Medicine, Section of Anatomy and History of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy

Published 2024-12-31

Keywords

  • modern anastomosis,
  • anatomy,
  • physiology,
  • history

How to Cite

Saccheri, P., Crivellato, E., & Travan, L. (2024). A forgotten debate in the history of medicine: vascular anastomoses, from open functional relationships to tight structural connections. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, 128(2), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.36253/ijae-15607

Abstract

According to current anatomical nomenclature, vascular anastomoses are direct connections between blood vessels. The Greek word ‘anastomōsis’ means ‘opening’ and conveys the idea of ‘patency’ rather than ‘connection’. Anastomōsis, and the related term sunanastomōsis, originally referred to a mere approximation of the mouths of adjacent blood vessels – especially arterioles and venules – facing each other at their terminal ends. These vessels were not strictly connected and did not form anatomical units in the proper sense. Over time, however, the term anastomōsis underwent a significant semantic change and now denotes a closed, structured anatomical connection. How and when did this semantic shift occur? The aim of the present study was to evaluate the concept of anastomōsis in different historical periods from Antiquity to the Seventeenth century and to investigate how this entity gradually lost its original meaning of mere functional opening to acquire the notion of true anatomical structure.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...