Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Ruralities
Editoriale

Rural discourse

Antonio di Campli
DIST, Politecnico di Torino
Catalina Mejía Catalina Mejía
Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London

Published 2021-12-23

Keywords

  • difference,
  • coexistence,
  • constitutive outside,
  • rurality,
  • crisis

How to Cite

di Campli, A., & Catalina Mejía, C. M. (2021). Rural discourse. Contesti. Città, Territori, Progetti, 2(2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.13128/contest-13208

Abstract

Ruralities proposes a reconceptualization of the rural, meaning by this term a 'place of crisis' within our design
and planning practices. This reconceptualization is presented through a discourse articulated on two points: Rural as a 'constitutive outside' of the urban and as a 'political mode', as a place where specific forms of power are manifested. Rural spaces are inhabited, produced, owned and cared for by a variety of subjects, by humans and non-humans as well as by a variety of ethnicities, cultures, social groups. In this sense we are against a common imagery where the rural is seen as a place populated by alleged traditional societies. This is an image that implicitly works as a device of racial, social and economic domination. In the same way, we question the Marxian approach to the 'agrarian question' conceived only as a predominantly economic problem, highlighting its racial and ethnic aspects. The goal is to define a different 'rural discourse' able to pay attention to the diversity of rural bodies and to delineate better analysis and design strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...